Cited by 1,102Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The group polarization phenomenon.

Myers, David G., Lamm, Helmut·1976·Psychological Bulletin

DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Untitled work
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The attraction paradigm
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,366
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 1×
“A further difficulty when trying to document the generality of a phenomenon is the likelihood that negative results have more often gone unreported than have rejections of the null hypothesis (Greenwald, 1975).”
Background
Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change
Greenwald, A. G. (1968) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-x · Cited by 1,022
The Impact of College on Students
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429339059 · Cited by 957
Integration theory and attitude change.
Anderson, N. H. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0030834 · Cited by 934

Show all 150 references

Sorted by citations

Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467 · Cited by 1,850
THE NORMALIZATION OF CORRUPTION IN ORGANIZATIONS
Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25001-2 · Cited by 1,548
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43 · Cited by 1,428
PUBLIC DELIBERATION, DISCURSIVE PARTICIPATION, AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT: A Review of the Empirical Literature
Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · Cited by 1,502
Group Performance and Decision Making
Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009 · Cited by 1,332
Why it won't happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility.
Weinstein, N. D. (1984) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.3.5.431 · Cited by 1,029
Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.
Isenberg, D. J. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141 · Cited by 1,044
From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact.
Nowak, A. K., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.362 · Cited by 975
Value from hedonic experience and engagement
Higgins, E. T. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.439 · Cited by 949
An Exploration of High-Risk Leisure Consumption Through Skydiving
Celsi, R. L., Rose, R. L., & Leigh, T. W. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209330 · Cited by 1,150
The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups
Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S. B., & Sethna, B. N. (1991) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2 · Cited by 797
Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139 · Cited by 1,051
Self-Generated Attitude Change
Tesser, A. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60010-6 · Cited by 665
Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations
Levy, J. S. (1997) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00034 · Cited by 645
Models of Social Influence: Towards the Next Frontiers
Flache, A., Mäs, M., Feliciani, T., Chattoe-Brown, E., Deffuant, G., Huet, S., & Lorenz, J. (2017) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.3521 · Cited by 601
Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion.
Stasser, G. L., & Titus, W. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81 · Cited by 600
Toward a Contingency Model of Strategic Risk Taking
Baird, I. S., & Thomas, H. (1985) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4278108 · Cited by 583
Social Identification, Self-Categorization and Social Influence
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779108401862 · Cited by 382
Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model.
McCauley, C. R., & Moskalenko, S. (2017) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000062 · Cited by 569
Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed
Dan Ariely, C., & Levav, J. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/317585 · Cited by 520
Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads.
Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.730 · Cited by 523
Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology: A useful dichotomy?
Tetlock, P. E., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.1.59 · Cited by 501
Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups.
Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J., & Kramer, G. P. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.687 · Cited by 491
Organizational learning from performance feedback a behavioral perspective on innovation and change
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cited by 468
Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups
Webb, N. M. (1982) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543052003421 · Cited by 494
Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation
Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2005) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280440000062 · Cited by 482
Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks
Baumann, F., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Sokolov, I. M., & Starnini, M. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.048301 · Cited by 427
Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think1
Dennis, A. R. (1996) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249563 · Cited by 439
Hidden Profiles: A Brief History
Stasser, G. L., & Titus, W. (2003) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2003.9682897 · Cited by 434
Glass Breaking, Strategy Making, and Value Creating: Meta-Analytic Outcomes of Women as CEOs and TMT members
Jeong, S., & Harrison, D. A. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0716 · Cited by 459
Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media
Spohr, D. (2017) · Business Information Review · doi:10.1177/0266382117722446 · Cited by 530
THE DELIBERATIVE CITIZEN: THEORY AND EVIDENCE
Mendelberg, T. (2009) · Cited by 421
Cleaning Up the Big Muddy: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Determinants of Escalation of Commitment
Sleesman, D. J., Conlon, D. E., McNamara, G. M., & Miles, J. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0696 · Cited by 423
Speech Accommodation Theory: The First Decade and Beyond
Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Johnson, P. (1987) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.1987.11678638 · Cited by 399
Towards a theory of collective phenomena: Consensus and attitude changes in groups
Galam, S., & Moscovici, S. (1991) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420210105 · Cited by 387
The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment.
Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.959 · Cited by 545
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Barberá, P. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.004 · Cited by 373
Aligning Identities, Emotions, and Beliefs to Create Commitment to Sustainable Social and Political Action
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309341563 · Cited by 373
Brand awareness in business markets: When is it related to firm performance?
Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., & Schmitt, J. (2010) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.03.004 · Cited by 405
Reflective Democracy
Goodin, R. E. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199256179.001.0001 · Cited by 360
Group decision‐making as a structurational process
Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1985) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335638509383719 · Cited by 349
Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 · Cited by 351
Managing Innovation: When Less is More
Nemeth, C. J. (1997) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165922 · Cited by 358
BEYOND EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW VALIDITY: A COMPREHENSIVE NARRATIVE REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH AND TRENDS OVER TIME
Posthuma, R. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2002) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00103.x · Cited by 362
Dynamics of Political Polarization
Baldassarri, D., & Bearman, P. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200507 · Cited by 455
Extending the social information processing perspective: New links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions
Zalesny, M. D., & Ford, J. K. (1990) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90037-a · Cited by 341
Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making.
McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S. B., & Siegel, J. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.917 · Cited by 324
A Social Comparison Account of Gossip
Wert, S. R., & Salovey, P. (2004) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.122 · Cited by 325
Marketing Agility: The Concept, Antecedents, and a Research Agenda
Kalaignanam, K., Tuli, K. R., Kushwaha, T., Lee, L., & Gal, D. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242920952760 · Cited by 384
Sanctions, Perceptions, and Crime: Implications for Criminal Deterrence
Apel, R. (2013) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-012-9170-1 · Cited by 308
Beyond fiasco: a reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes
Aldag, R. J., & Fuller, S. R. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.533 · Cited by 306
of Human Services
Price, E. (1980) · Cited by 302
Facts and Where to Find Them: Empirical Research on Internet Platforms and Content Moderation
Keller, D., & Leerssen, P. (2020) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.1017/9781108890960
Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Process
(2002) · Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks · doi:10.1111/b.9781405106535.2002.x · Cited by 296
A Bottom‐Up Theory of Public Opinion about Foreign Policy
Kertzer, J. D., & Zeitzoff, T. (2017) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12314 · Cited by 443
New Product Development Decision‐Making Effectiveness: Comparing Individuals, Face‐To‐Face Teams, and Virtual Teams*
Schmidt, J. B., Montoya‐Weiss, M. M., & Massey, A. P. (2001) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00973.x · Cited by 290
Social identification effects in group polarization.
Mackie, D. M. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.720 · Cited by 280
Confidence, uncertainty, and the use of information.
Peterson, D. K., & Pitz, G. F. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.85 · Cited by 292
Research in Criminal Deterrence: Laying the Groundwork for the Second Decade
Cook, P. J. (1980) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/449070 · Cited by 272
The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities
Lind, E. A., Kray, L. J., & Thompson, L. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2785 · Cited by 273
COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL INFORMATION: STATUS SALIENCE AND STATUS DIFFERENCES.
Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256623 · Cited by 326
Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2002) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.3 · Cited by 270
A Laboratory Study of Group Polarisation in the Team Dictator Game
Cason, T. N., & Mui, V. (1997) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00058.x · Cited by 251
Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups
Weisband, S. P. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90070-n · Cited by 250
Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior
Lamm, H., & Myers, D. G. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60007-6 · Cited by 247
Self-citation
Behavioral software engineering: A definition and systematic literature review
Lenberg, P., FELDT, R. H., & Wallgren, L. G. (2015) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.084 · Cited by 257
Who counts as an American?: the boundaries of national identity
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5334 · Cited by 246
Negotiated belief structures and decision performance: An empirical investigation
Walsh, J. P., Henderson, C. M., & Deighton, J. (1988) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(88)90012-x · Cited by 239
Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance.
Hinsz, V. B. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.705 · Cited by 232
Online vs. Face-to-Face Deliberation: Effects on Civic Engagement
Min, S.-J. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00377.x · Cited by 252
Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency.
MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21 · Cited by 230
GROUP DECISION MAKING UNDER THREAT: THE TYCOON GAME.
Gladstein, D. L., & Reilly, N. P. (1985) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256117 · Cited by 236
Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950–1990
Davis, J. H. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90044-8 · Cited by 225
‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups
Tindale, R. S., & Kameda, T. (2000) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430200003002002 · Cited by 225
Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change
Tesser, A., & Leone, C. T. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90004-x · Cited by 222
The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group‐based interaction
Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2008) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466608x313774 · Cited by 223
Information Exchange and Use in Small Group Decision Making
Dennis, A. R. (1996) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496496274003 · Cited by 220
Biases in future-oriented Delphi studies: A cognitive perspective
Winkler, J., & Moser, R. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.021 · Cited by 230
Audit Team Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, and Fraud Risk Assessment: Implications of SAS No. 99
Carpenter, T. D. (2007) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1119 · Cited by 217
Case Closed? On the John F. Kennedy Assassination: Biased Assimilation of Evidence and Attitude Polarization
McHoskey, J. W. (1995) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1703_7 · Cited by 158
The Attribution Process in Consumer Decision Making
Mizerski, R. W., Golden, L. L., & Kernan, J. B. (1979) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208756 · Cited by 222
Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments.
Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.149 · Cited by 215
Social and cognitive sources of potential inaccuracy in job analysis.
Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.82.5.627 · Cited by 219
Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: Could Participant Self-Selection Have Led to the Cruelty?
Carnahan, T., & McFarland, S. G. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206292689 · Cited by 211
So Right It's Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision Making
Baron, R. S. (2005) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37004-3 · Cited by 212
Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments.
Fiedler, K. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.193 · Cited by 212
Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda
Guess, A. M., & Lyons, B. A. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.003 · Cited by 284
Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias.
Kramer, G. P., Kerr, N. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1990) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01044220 · Cited by 202
Bandwidth and Echo: Trust, Information, and Gossip in Social Networks
Casella, A., Rauch, J. E., & Burt, R. S. (2001) · Cited by 199
No Substitute for Experience: Presidents, Advisers, and Information in Group Decision Making
Saunders, E. (2017) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081831600045x · Cited by 86
Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: management challenges and symptoms
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3291 · Cited by 193
Who Ordered That? The Economics of Treatment Choices in Medical Care
Chandra, A., Cutler, D., & Song, Z. (2011) · Handbook of health economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53592-4.00006-2 · Cited by 196
Toward a Contingency Model of Strategic Risk Taking
Baird, I. S., & Thomas, H. (1985) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257965 · Cited by 191
Structured elicitation of expert judgments for threatened species assessment: a case study on a continental scale using email
McBride, M. F., Garnett, S. T., Szabo, J. K., Burbidge, A. H., Butchart, S. H. M., Christidis, L., Dutson, G., FORD, H. A., Loyn, R., Watson, D. M., et al. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00221.x · Cited by 191
Making better decisions in groups
Bang, D., & Frith, C. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.170193 · Cited by 210
The Emergence of Dynamical Social Psychology
Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. K. (1997) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0802_1 · Cited by 189
Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds
Navajas, J., Niella, T., Garbulsky, G., Bahrami, B., & Sigman, M. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0273-4 · Cited by 206
Measuring the impact of online personalisation: Past, present and future
Zanker, M., Rook, L., & Jannach, D. (2019) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.06.006 · Cited by 213
Polarized Norms and Social Frames of Reference: A Test of the Self-Categorization Theory of Group Polarization
Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C., & Davidson, B. (1990) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1101_6 · Cited by 314

Authors: Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H.
Affiliations: Hope College (US)
ORCID: Myers, David G.
Venue: Psychological Bulletin
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1976-07
Volume: 83
Issue: 4
Pages: 602-627
ISSN: 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
1939-1455
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
OpenAlex: W2004624112
Semantic Scholar: 3d20e757aa402632d574801181b23292981e3e51
Cited by: 1,102
References: 150
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 48
FWCI: 90.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, group decision making, attitude change, group discussion, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The group polarization phenomenon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks