Cited by 1,102Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The group polarization phenomenon.

Myers, David G., Lamm, Helmut·1976·Psychological Bulletin

DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Untitled work
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The attraction paradigm
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,366
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 1×
“A further difficulty when trying to document the generality of a phenomenon is the likelihood that negative results have more often gone unreported than have rejections of the null hypothesis (Greenwald, 1975).”
Background
Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change
Greenwald, A. G. (1968) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-x · Cited by 1,022
The Impact of College on Students
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429339059 · Cited by 957
Integration theory and attitude change.
Anderson, N. H. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0030834 · Cited by 934

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 150 references

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,102

Collaborative Writing Interactions in One Ninth-Grade Classroom
Dale, H. (1994) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.1994.9941264 · Cited by 77
Grouptask Satisfaction
Mason, C., & Griffin, M. A. (2002) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10496402033003001 · Cited by 71
Groups and Deliberation
Karpowitz, C. F., & Mendelberg, T. (2007) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00092.x · Cited by 75
Coalition Cabinet Decision Making: Institutional and Psychological Factors
Kaarbo, J. (2008) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00747.x · Cited by 71
Language use as Social Strategy: A Review and an Analytic Framework for the Social Sciences
Guérin, B. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.3.251 · Cited by 72
HK–SEIR model of public opinion evolution based on communication factors
Li, Q., Du, Y., Li, Z., Hu, J., Hu, R., Lv, B., & Jia, P. (2021) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104192 · Cited by 68
Comment on “Heuristics in the strategy context” by Bingham and Eisenhardt (2011)
Vuori, N., & Vuori, T. O. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2259 · Cited by 69
Effects of gain and loss decision frames on risky purchase negotiations.
Schurr, P. H. (1987) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.351 · Cited by 67
Probability Assessment by Individual Auditors and Audit Teams: An Empirical Investigation
Solomon, I. (1982) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2490893 · Cited by 67
Democratic Transparency in the Platform Society
Gorwa, R., & Ash, T. G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.013 · Cited by 71
Asymmetrical social influence in freely interacting groups: A test of three models.
Tindale, R. S., Davis, J. H., Vollrath, D. A., Nagao, D. H., & Hinsz, V. B. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.438 · Cited by 66
A comparison of strategies for reducing interval overconfidence in group judgments.
Plous, S. (1995) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.80.4.443 · Cited by 66
The Consequences of Communicating Social Stereotypes
Thompson, M. S., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1419 · Cited by 68
Mandevillian intelligence
Smart, P. R. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1414-z · Cited by 66
Rumor clustering, consensus, and polarization: Dynamic social impact and self-organization of hearsay
DiFonzo, N., Bourgeois, M. J., Suls, J., Homan, C., Stupak, N., Brooks, B. P., Ross, D. S., & Bordia, P. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.010 · Cited by 76
A computer simulation of jury decision making.
Penrod, S., & Hastie, R. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.87.2.133 · Cited by 65
Misinformation and Its Correction
Wittenberg, C., & Berinsky, A. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.009 · Cited by 64
Accuracy in perceptions of consensus: Differential tendencies of people with majority and minority positions
Sanders, G. S., & Mullen, B. R. (1983) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420130104 · Cited by 64
Anonymity in Computer-Mediated Communication: More Contrarian Ideas with Less Influence
Haines, R. P., Hough, J. R., Cao, L., & Haines, D. (2012) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-012-9318-2 · Cited by 63
Does negatively toned language use on social media lead to attitude polarization?
Buder, J., Rabl, L., Feiks, M., Badermann, M., & Zurstiege, G. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106663 · Cited by 73
Environmental Decision-Making in Times of Polarization
Judge, M., Kashima, Y., Steg, L., & Dietz, T. M. (2023) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-115339 · Cited by 73
Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera?
Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Munhall, P. J., Handley, I. M., & Beers, M. J. (2001) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80006-x · Cited by 65
Creating smarter schools through collaboration
Tschannen‐Moran, M., Uline, C. L., Hoy, A. W., & Mackley, T. A. (2000) · Journal of Educational Administration · doi:10.1108/09578230010342312 · Cited by 63
Persuasive Arguments Theory, Group Polarization, and Choice Shifts
Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1984) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167284102012 · Cited by 63
Understanding the Radical Mind: Identifying Signals to Detect Extremist Content on Twitter
Nouh, M., Nurse, J. R. C., & Goldsmith, M. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi.2019.8823548 · Cited by 62
Ethical Decision Making: A Comparison of Computer- Supported and Face-to-face Group
Cappel, J. J., & Windsor, J. C. (2000) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1006344825235 · Cited by 62
Power Politics and the Balance of Risk: Hypotheses on Great Power Intervention in the Periphery
Taliaferro, J. W. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00368.x · Cited by 65
Network Structure Moderates Intergroup Differentiation of Stereotyped Rumors
DiFonzo, N., Suls, J. M., Beckstead, J. W., Bourgeois, M. J., Homan, C. M., Brougher, S. J., Younge, A., & Schwab, N. (2014) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.5.409 · Cited by 62
How Aspiration to Office Conditions the Impact of Government Participation on Party Platform Change
Schumacher, G., van de Wardt, M., Vis, B., & Klitgaard, M. B. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12174 · Cited by 59
Investigation of the preference-reversal phenomenon in a new product introduction task.
Mowen, J. C., & Gentry, J. W. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.65.6.715 · Cited by 61
Team Management and Mutual FundsPreprint
Baer, M., Kempf, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.809484 · Cited by 59
A Review of Our Research on Group Polarization: Eleven Experiments on the Effects of Group Discussion on Risk Acceptance, Probability Estimation, and Negotiation Positions
Lamm, H. (1988) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1988.62.3.807 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Group Discussion and Judgment
Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, C. E. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5578-9_4 · Cited by 57
Collective Choice, Judgment, and Problem Solving
Stasser, G. L., & Dietz-Uhler, B. L. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch2 · Cited by 57
Technology, culture and persuasiveness: a study of choice-shifts in group settings
El‐Shinnawy, M., & Vinzé, A. (1997) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1997.0138 · Cited by 58
REPRESENTATIONS AND INFLUENCE PROCESSES IN GROUPS: TOWARDS A SOCIO-COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON COGNITION IN ORGANIZATION
Allard‐Poesi, F. (1998) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0956-5221(98)00018-9 · Cited by 63
Bad News Has Wings: Dread Risk Mediates Social Amplification in Risk Communication
Jagiello, R., & Hills, T. T. (2018) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13117 · Cited by 63
Identifying Group Task Satisfaction at Work
Mason, C., & Griffin, M. A. (2003) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496403252153 · Cited by 57
Finding the Hypnotic Virtuoso
Register, P. A., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1986) · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00207148608406974 · Cited by 57
The role of social comparison in choice shifts.
Goethals, G. R., & Zanna, M. P. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.9.1469 · Cited by 57
Extreme members and group polarization
Swol, L. M. V. (2009) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510802584368 · Cited by 56
The confidence heuristic: A game-theoretic analysis
Thomas, J., & McFadyen, R. G. (1995) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(94)00032-6 · Cited by 56
Social Influences in Standard Setting: The Effects of Social Interaction on Group Judgments
Fitzpatrick, A. R. (1989) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170185 · Cited by 56
Developing relationships in innovation clusters
Scott, S. A., Hughes, M., & Kraus, S. (2018) · Entrepreneurship and Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985626.2018.1537145 · Cited by 55
Impression management in survey responding: Easier for collectivists or individualists?
Riemer, H., & Shavitt, S. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.10.001 · Cited by 56
Now for Me, Later for Us? Effects of Group Context on Temporal Discounting
Charlton, S. R., Yi, R., Porter, C. M., Carter, A. E., Bickel, W. K., & Rachlin, H. C. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.766 · Cited by 61
The Catastrophic Link Between the Importance and Extremity of Political Attitudes
Liu, J. H.-F., & Latané, B. (1998) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1024828729174 · Cited by 55
The Recruitment and Radicalisation of Western Citizens: Does Ostracism Have a Role in Homegrown Terrorism?
Knapton, H. (2014) · Journal of European Psychology Students · doi:10.5334/jeps.bo · Cited by 55
Explaining Extremity in the Foreign Policies of Parliamentary Democracies
Beasley, R. K., & Kaarbo, J. (2014) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12164 · Cited by 54
Perceptions of Hate Crime Perpetrators and Victims as Influenced by Race, Political Orientation, and Peer Group
Marcus‐Newhall, A., Blake, L. P., & BAUMANN, J. (2002) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764202046001008 · Cited by 54
The communication of social stereotypes: The effects of group discussion and information distribution on stereotypic appraisals.
Bräuer, M., Judd, C. M., & Jacquelin, V. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.463 · Cited by 56
Accentuation of information processes and biases in group judgments integrating base-rate and case-specific information
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Nagao, D. H. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.013 · Cited by 53
The Directional Effects of Discussion on Auditors' Moral Reasoning
Thorne, L., & Hartwick, J. (2001) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1092/y917-mpry-panf-prve · Cited by 53
The Effects of Victim Impact Evidence on the Verdicts and Sentencing Judgments of Mock Jurors
Myers, B., & Arbuthnot, J. (1999) · Journal of Offender Rehabilitation · doi:10.1300/j076v29n03_05 · Cited by 54
The Dual Echo Chamber: Modeling Social Media Polarization for Interventional Recommending
Donkers, T., & Ziegler, J. (2021) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) · doi:10.1145/3460231.3474261 · Cited by 55
An Analytical Framework for Joint vs Separate Decisions by Couples in Choice Experiments: The Case of Coastal Water Quality in Tobago
Beharry-Borg, N., Hensher, D. A., & Riccardo Scarpa, A. (2009) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9283-7 · Cited by 52
Negotiating teams: A levels of analysis approach.
Brodt, S. E., & Thompson, L. (2001) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.5.3.208 · Cited by 51
STEP—A System for Teaching Experimental Psychology using E-Prime
MacWhinney, B., James, J. S., Schunn, C. D., Li, P., & Schneider, W. (2001) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195379 · Cited by 53
Levels of moralisation: a new conception of moral sensitivity
Lovett, B. J., & Jordan, A. (2010) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057241003754914 · Cited by 53
Quagmires in the periphery: Foreign wars and escalating commitment in international conflict
Taliaferro, J. W. (1998) · Security Studies · doi:10.1080/09636419808429352 · Cited by 51
Hawkish Biases and Group Decision Making
Kertzer, J. D., Holmes, M., LeVeck, B. L., & Wayne, C. N. (2022) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818322000017 · Cited by 52
The group matters: A review of processes and outcomes in intelligence analysis.
Straus, S. G., Parker, A. M., & Bruce, J. B. (2011) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0022734 · Cited by 51
The Potential for Bias in Videotaped Confessions1
Lassiter, G. D., Slaw, R. D., BRIGGS, M. A., & Scanlan, C. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00980.x · Cited by 50
Perceived support in a dual organizational environment: Union participation in a university setting
Goeddeke, F. X., & Kammeyer‐Mueller, J. D. (2009) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.629 · Cited by 49
A Polarization Model for Describing Group Preferences
Rao, V. R., & Steckel, J. H. (1991) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209245 · Cited by 49
Stimulating Thinking: Cultivating Better Decisions with Groupware Through Categorization
Dennis, A. R. (2000) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2000.11045649 · Cited by 49
Oppositional loyalty as a brand identity-driven outcome: a conceptual framework and empirical evidence
Liao, J., Dong, X., Luo, Z., & Guo, R. (2020) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-08-2019-2511 · Cited by 48
Individual attitude change and societal dynamics: Computational experiments with psychological theories.
Lorenz, J., Neumann, M., & Schröder, T. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000291 · Cited by 48
Demographic faultlines and creativity in diverse groups
Nishii, L. H., & Goncalo, J. A. (2008) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(08)11001-5 · Cited by 48
Effects of Group Cohesiveness on Attitude Polarization and the Acquisition of Knowledge in a Strategic Planning Context
Whitney, J. C., & Smith, R. A. (1983) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378302000207 · Cited by 48
Forecasting tournaments, epistemic humility and attitude depolarization
Mellers, B., Tetlock, P., & Arkes, H. R. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.021 · Cited by 46
A Polarized Discourse: Effects of Opinion Differentiation and Structural Differentiation on Communication
Koudenburg, N., & Kashima, Y. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211030816 · Cited by 56
The Articulation of Sauropod Necks: Methodology and Mythology
Stevens, K. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078572 · Cited by 50
Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cited by 48
Using Twitter Bios to Measure Changes in Self-Identity: Are Americans Defining Themselves More Politically Over Time?
Rogers, N., & Jones, J. J. (2021) · Journal of Social Computing · doi:10.23919/jsc.2021.0002 · Cited by 47
Empirical analysis of online anonymity and user behaviors: the impact of real name policy
Cho, D., Kim, S., & Acquisti, A. (2012) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2012.241 · Cited by 46
Crowd Behavior as "Risky Shift": A Laboratory Experiment
Johnson, N. R., Stemler, J. G., & Hunter, D. (1977) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/3033521 · Cited by 46
Nietzsche Against the Philosophical CanonPreprint
Leiter, B. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2254398 · Cited by 46
Group Polarization and Repeated Attitude Expressions: A New Take on an Old Topic
Bräuer, M., & Judd, C. M. (1996) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779643000010 · Cited by 45
Information technology support for collaborative decision making in auditing: An experimental investigation
Karan, V., Kerr, D. S., Murthy, U. S., & Vinzé, A. (1996) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/0167-9236(95)00007-0 · Cited by 44
Comparison of training methods for improving the psychometric quality of experimental and administrative performance ratings.
Warmke, D. L., & Billings, R. S. (1979) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.64.2.124 · Cited by 45
Attitudes, Norms, and Social Groups
Cooper, J., Kelly, K. A., & Weaver, K. D. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch11 · Cited by 47
Legal blame: how jurors think and talk about accidents
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2417 · Cited by 46
The Consequences of Crime in Company: Co-Offending, Victim–Offender Relationship, and Quality of Violence
Lantz, B. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260518786497 · Cited by 44
The antecedents and consequences of restrictive age-based ratings in the global motion picture industry
Leenders, M. A. A. M., & Eliashberg, J. (2011) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.06.001 · Cited by 44
Worrying about what others think: A social-comparison concern intervention in small learning groups
Micari, M., & Pazos, P. (2014) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787414544874 · Cited by 47
The role of asset specificity in the vertical integration decision
Whyte, G. (1994) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(94)90003-5 · Cited by 47
Group Decision Making Under Majority and Unanimity Decision Rules
Miller, C. E. (1985) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3033781 · Cited by 44
Propagation of Individual Bias through Group Judgment: Error in the Treatment of Asymmetrically Informative Signals
Bottom, W. P., Ladha, K. K., & Miller, G. J. (2002) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1023/a:1020643713354 · Cited by 44
SOCIAL CLUSTERS AND OPINION CLUSTERS
Abelson, R. P. (1979) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-352550-5.50018-3 · Cited by 44
Homophily and acrophily as drivers of political segregation
Goldenberg, A., Abruzzo, J. M., Huang, Z., Schöne, J., Bailey, D., Willer, R., Halperin, E., & Gross, J. J. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01474-9 · Cited by 65
Social Comparison and Influence in Groups
Forsyth, D. R. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_5 · Cited by 43
Of juries and court-appointed experts: The impact of nonadversarial versus adversarial expert testimony.
Brekke, N., Enko, P. J., Clavet, G., et al. (1991) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/h0093997 · Cited by 43
A Cross-Cultural Exploration of the Reference Dependence of Crucial Group Decisions under Risk
Levi, A. S., & Whyte, G. (1997) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002797041006004 · Cited by 44
A Stackelberg game model for large-scale group decision making based on cooperative incentives
Tang, M., Liao, H., & Wu, X. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.013 · Cited by 44
Hatred
Brogaard, B. “. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084448.001.0001 · Cited by 53
Group Polarization in a Model of Information Aggregation
Roux, N., & Sobel, J. (2015) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20140252 · Cited by 41
Rescuing Collective Wisdom when the Average Group Opinion Is Wrong
Laan, A., Madirolas, G., & de Polavieja, G. G. (2017) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2017.00056 · Cited by 42
Explanations for racial discrimination: The effect of group discussion on intergroup attributions
Hewstone, M., & Jaspars, J. (1982) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420120101 · Cited by 41
The behaviour of corporate actors: How much can we learn from the experimental literature?
Engel, C. (2010) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137410000135 · Cited by 40

Authors: Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H.
Affiliations: Hope College (US)
ORCID: Myers, David G.
Venue: Psychological Bulletin
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1976-07
Volume: 83
Issue: 4
Pages: 602-627
ISSN: 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
1939-1455
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
OpenAlex: W2004624112
Semantic Scholar: 3d20e757aa402632d574801181b23292981e3e51
Cited by: 1,102
References: 150
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 48
FWCI: 90.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, group decision making, attitude change, group discussion, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The group polarization phenomenon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks