Cited by 1,102Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The group polarization phenomenon.

Myers, David G., Lamm, Helmut·1976·Psychological Bulletin

DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Untitled work
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The attraction paradigm
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,366
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 1×
“A further difficulty when trying to document the generality of a phenomenon is the likelihood that negative results have more often gone unreported than have rejections of the null hypothesis (Greenwald, 1975).”
Background
Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change
Greenwald, A. G. (1968) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-x · Cited by 1,022
The Impact of College on Students
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429339059 · Cited by 957
Integration theory and attitude change.
Anderson, N. H. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0030834 · Cited by 934

Show all 150 references

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,102

Real Name Verification Law on the Internet: A Poison or Cure for Privacy?
Cho, D. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1981-5_11 · Cited by 14
An assessment of the potential utility of “scientific jury selection”: A “thought experiment” approach
Tindale, R. S., & Nagao, D. H. (1986) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90038-5 · Cited by 14
Stages in Group Decision Making: The Decomposition of Historical Narratives
Burnstein, E., & Berbaum, M. L. (1983) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3790872 · Cited by 14
Extremists are more confident
Heinzelmann, N. C., & Tran, V. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00616-9 · Cited by 13
Power of the network and power from the network: Group processes and radicalization
Ellenberg, M. D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2024) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302241240704 · Cited by 13
Behavioral biases in pension fund trustees’ decision making
Weiss‐Cohen, L., Ayton, P., Clacher, I., & Thoma, V. (2019) · Review of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1108/rbf-05-2018-0049 · Cited by 17
Endowment Effect in negotiations: group versus individual decision-making
Galin, A. (2012) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-012-9350-3 · Cited by 13
For better or for worse: Social influences on risk-taking
McCoy, S. S., & Natsuaki, M. N. (2017) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2017.1294139 · Cited by 13
Impacts of human communication network topology on group optimism bias in Capital Project Planning: a human-subject experiment
Du, J., Zhao, D. F., & Zhang, O. (2018) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2018.1508848 · Cited by 14
How can we support the commander's involvement in the planning process? An exploratory study into remote and co-located command planning
Walker, G. H., Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., & Jenkins, D. (2009) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.12.003 · Cited by 13
Not worth the risk? Attitudes of adults with learning difficulties, and their informal and formal carers to the hazards of everyday life
Heyman, B., & Huckle, S. (1993) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90190-f · Cited by 13
The Effectiveness of Expert Support Technology for Decision Making: Individuals versus Small Groups
Nah, F. F., Mao, J., & Benbasat, I. (1999) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1080/026839699344638 · Cited by 13
Motivation
Studer, B., & Knecht, S. (2016) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.07.001 · Cited by 13
The Psychology of Groups
Forsyth, D. R. (2014) · Cited by 13
Market responses to qualitative information from a group polarization perspective
Burton, F. G., Coller, M., & Tuttle, B. M. (2005) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2005.01.002 · Cited by 14
Human murmuration: Group polarisation as compression in interaction-language dynamics captured by large language models
Durrheim, K. L., & Quayle, M. (2025) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2025.2499332 · Cited by 19
A novel rumor detection method focusing on social psychology with graph attention network
Li, L., Liu, G., Liu, Y., Yu, Q., Luo, C., & Li, N. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129609 · Cited by 12
A Multi-agent Model for Polarization Under Confirmation Bias in Social Networks
Alvim, M. S., Amorim, B., Knight, S., Quintero, S., & Valencia, F. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78089-0_2 · Cited by 12
How Modeling Methods for Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Can Benefit From Psychology Research
Mkhitaryan, S., & Giabbanelli, P. J. (2021) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc52266.2021.9715408 · Cited by 12
Depolarization of opinions on social networks through random nudges
Pal, R., Kumar, A., & Santhanam, M. S. (2023) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.108.034307 · Cited by 12
The Effects of Fellow Patients on the Emotional Well-Being and Satisfaction with Care of Postoperative Cosmetic Surgery Patients
Kulik, J. A., Shelby, D., & Cooper, R. N. (2000) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200011000-00032 · Cited by 12
Heterogeneity assumptions in the specification of bargaining models: a study of household level trade-offs between commuting time and salary
O’Neill, V., & Hess, S. (2013) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9483-4 · Cited by 12
The Handbook of Communication and Security
Taylor, B. C., & Bean, H. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351180962 · Cited by 15
When Will We Meet Again? Regularities of Social Connectivity and Their Reflections in Memory and Decision Making
Pachur, T., Schooler, L. J., & Stevens, J. R. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0007 · Cited by 12
Simple Heuristics in a Social Game
Hertwig, R., Fischbacher, U., & Bruhin, A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0002 · Cited by 12
The Is and Ought of Sharing: The Equality Heuristic Across the Lifespan
Keller, M., Gummerum, M., Canz, T., Gigerenzer, G., & Takezawa, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0006 · Cited by 12
On the Virtues of Assuming Minimal Differences in Information Processing in Individuals and Groups
Kerr, N. L., Niedermeier, K. E., & Kaplan, M. F. (2000) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430200003002006 · Cited by 12
Will Distributed GSS Groups Make More Extreme Decisions? An Empirical Study
Sia, C. L., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. (1996) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 12
Echo chambers, polarization, and “Post-truth”: In search of a connection
Munroe, W. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2174426 · Cited by 15
Body alteration: On the mental function of body modification and body decoration
Weiler, S. M., Mühlenbeck, C., & Jacobsen, T. (2024) · Culture & Psychology · doi:10.1177/1354067x241242414 · Cited by 13
Opposing positions, dividing interactions, and hostile affect: A systematic review and conceptualization of “online climate change polarization”
van Eck, C. W. (2024) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.906 · Cited by 13
The impact of practical experience on theoretical knowledge at different cognitive levels
Ryneveld, L. V., Holm, D. E., Botha, T., et al. (2020) · Journal of the South African Veterinary Association · doi:10.4102/jsava.v91i0.2042 · Cited by 11
Regularity Versus Novelty of Users' Multimodal Comment Patterns and Dynamics as Markers of Social Media Radicalization
Necaise, A., Williams, A., Vrzáková, H., & Amon, M. J. (2021) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/3465336.3475095 · Cited by 11
Decomposing attitude distributions to characterize attitude polarization in Europe
Gestefeld, M., Lorenz, J., Henschel, N. T., & Boehnke, K. (2022) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-022-00342-7 · Cited by 15
Kommunikationsformen und Deliberationsdynamik
Esau, K. (2022) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748934226 · Cited by 12
Input Democracy
Goodin, R. E. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256179.003.0008 · Cited by 11
Opening up the black box in GSS research: explaining group decision outcome with group process
Huang, W. W., & Li, D. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.036 · Cited by 11
Groups, group members and individual decision processes: The effects of decision strategy, social interaction style and reception of decision‐threatening information on post‐decision processes
Eisele, P. (2003) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1046/j.1467-9450.2003.00368.x · Cited by 10
Social influence, negotiation and cognition
Panzarasa, P., & Jennings, N. R. (2002) · Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory · doi:10.1016/s1569-190x(02)00089-8 · Cited by 11
The Mind as an Intuitive Pollster: Frugal Search in Social Spaces
Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0009 · Cited by 11
Rates of Vocational Rehabilitation System Closure Into Competitive Employment
Butterworth, J., & Gilmore, D. S. (1998) · Mental Retardation · doi:10.1352/0047-6765(1998)036 · Cited by 7
I am not a Crook: Effects of Denials on Perceptions of a Defendant's Guilt, Personality, and Motives
Holtgraves, T., & Grayer, A. R. (1994) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00578.x · Cited by 11
Informational influences on group decision making in a participative budgeting context
Daroca, F. P. (1984) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(84)90027-8 · Cited by 11
Social Psychology, Applications of Complexity to
Vallacher, R. R. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_501 · Cited by 11
Polarization, Political
Wojcieszak, M. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc168 · Cited by 12
Beyond the Dialogue: Multi-chatbot Group Motivational Interviewing for Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) Management
Geng, S., Inayoshi, R., Yang, C.-L., Sramek, Z., Umeda, Y., Kasahara, C., Sato, A. J., Hosio, S. J., & Yatani, K. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713918 · Cited by 10
Validating Argument-Based Opinion Dynamics with Survey Experiments
Banisch, S., & Shamon, H. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.5305 · Cited by 13
Event triggers and opinion leaders shape climate change discourse on Weibo
Yang, J., Hu, Y., Liu, M., Li, Y., Ma, Z., Fang, W., & Bi, J. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02124-4 · Cited by 12
The Amplifying Effect of Explainability in AI-assisted Decision-making in Groups
Duarte, R. D. B., Abreu, M. C., Campos, J., & Paiva, A. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713534 · Cited by 13
Greater Knowledge Enhances Complainant Credibility and Increases Jury Convictions for Child Sexual Assault
Goodman‐Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., Lee, E., & Cossins, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624331 · Cited by 10
Introduction
Persily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.002 · Cited by 11
Online polarization and cross-fertilization in multi-cleavage societies: the case of Spain
Rodríguez-Casañ, R., García-Vidal, E., Grimaldi, D., Carrasco-Farré, C., Vaquer-Estalrich, F., & Vila‐Francés, J. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-00909-5 · Cited by 11
The contribution of activity theory to modeling multi-actor decision-making: A focus on human capital investments
Marocco, S., & Talamo, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997062 · Cited by 12
The Effect of Influencers on Societal Polarization
Betts, J. M., & Bliuc, A. (2022) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc57314.2022.10015491 · Cited by 10
Foreign Policy Decision-Making The Psychological Dimension
Levy, J. S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541302.013.9 · Cited by 12
The Rise and Fall of Securitization
Chernenko, S. V., Hanson, S., & Sunderam, A. (2013) · Cited by 10
Stated preference modelling of intra-household decisions: Can you more easily approximate the preference space?
Beck, M. J., & Rose, J. M. (2017) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-017-9822-y · Cited by 10
Rethinking current models in social psychology: A Bayesian framework to understand dramatic social change
de la Sablonnière, R., Lina, J., & Cárdenas, D. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12273 · Cited by 12
The Role of Middle School Sports Involvement in Understanding High School Sexual Violence Perpetration
Basile, K. C., Espelage, D. L., Ingram, K. M., Simon, T. R., & Berrier, F. L. (2020) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260520922357 · Cited by 10
Microblog data analysis of emotional reactions to COVID-19 in China
Jin, Y., Yan, A., Sun, T., Zheng, P., & An, J. (2022) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110976 · Cited by 10
Interactive crowdsourcing to fact-check politicians.
Espina-Mairal, S., Bustos, F., Solovey, G., & Navajas, J. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000492 · Cited by 14
A structural analysis of risky‐shift and cautious‐shift discussions: The diffusion‐of‐responsibility theory
Cline, R. J. W., & Cline, T. R. (1980) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463378009369379 · Cited by 10
Participation Equality and Influence: Cues and Status in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work Groups
Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2094-4_18 · Cited by 10
An integration of shifts toward risk and caution in gambling situations
Sanders, G. S. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(78)90036-7 · Cited by 10
Dimensions of novelty : social representations of new foods
Huotilainen, A. (2005) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 10
Beyond the emotional work event : social sharing of emotion in organizations
Meisiek, S. (2003) · Cited by 10
Influence of mood states, group discussion, and interpersonal comparison on change in decision-making and information processing
Mohanty, S. N., & Suar, D. (2013) · International Journal of Decision Sciences Risk and Management · doi:10.1504/ijdsrm.2013.058915 · Cited by 9
A high-dimensional approach to measuring online polarization
Phillips, S. C., Uyheng, J., & Carley, K. M. (2023) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-023-00227-6 · Cited by 13
How Effective Altruism Can Help Psychologists Maximize Their Impact
Gainsburg, I., Pauer, S., Abboub, N., Aloyo, E., Mourrat, J.-C., & Cristià, A. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221079596 · Cited by 14
Let’s (not) talk about race: comparing mock jurors’ verdicts and deliberation content in a case of lethal police use of force with a White or Indigenous victim
Ewanation, L. A., & Maeder, E. M. (2023) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2023.2219814 · Cited by 14
Assessing the Effects of Information About Global Population Growth on Risk Perceptions and Support for Mitigation and Prevention Strategies
Dawson, I. G. J. (2018) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13114 · Cited by 9
The Impact of Facilitation on the Quality of Deliberation and Attitude Change
Kuhar, M., Krmelj, M., & Petrič, G. (2019) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419861439 · Cited by 11
Moral discourse boosts confidence in moral judgments
Heinzelmann, N. C., Höltgen, B. T. A., & Tran, V. (2021) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2021.1959026 · Cited by 10
Testing the group polarization hypothesis by using logit models
Rodrigo, M. F., & Ato, M. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.86 · Cited by 9
Group influences upon preferences for personal protection: A simulation study
Bradley, G. L. (1995) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/0022-4375(95)00009-f · Cited by 9
Coaching executive teams to reach better decisions
Ben‐Hur, S., Kinley, N., & Jonsen, K. (2012) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/02621711211243908 · Cited by 11
Exploring the Effects of “Low and Slow” Cyber Attacks on Team Decision Making
Mancuso, V., Funke, G. J., Finomore, V. S., & Knott, B. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213571084 · Cited by 9
The Dynamics of Societal Transition: Modeling Nonlinear Change in the Polish Economic System
Nowak, A. K., Vallacher, R. R., Kuś, M., & URBANIAK, J. (2005) · International Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1080/00207659.2005.11043141 · Cited by 9
Small fish in a small pond: the impact of collaborative learning on academic success for less-prepared students in a highly selective STEM environment
Micari, M., & Pazos, P. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1532395 · Cited by 9
Seeing is believing (or at least changing your mind): The influence of visibility and task complexity on preference changes in computer‐supported team decision making
Osatuyi, B., Hiltz, S. R., & Passerini, K. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23555 · Cited by 9
A Comparison of Hindsight Bias in Groups and Individuals: The Moderating Role of Plausibility
Choi, D., & Choi, I. (2010) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00576.x · Cited by 9
Comparison of Perceived Risk Taking in Groups and Implications Drawn from the Risky-Shift Paradigm
Noe, F. P., McDonald, C., & Hammitt, W. E. (1983) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1983.56.1.199 · Cited by 9
Collective Task Responsibility Allocation
Rantilla, A. K. (2000) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640003100606 · Cited by 9
Coalition formation in triads with single-peaked payoff curves
Miller, C. E. (1979) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830240202 · Cited by 9
Locus of control‐based argumentation as a predictor of group polarization
Alderton, S. M. (1982) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463378209369475 · Cited by 9
Mathematical Models of Juror and Jury Decision-Making
Grofman, B. (1981) · Perspectives in law & psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-3767-6_9 · Cited by 9
Large-Scale Risk As a Problem Of Technological, Psychological and Political Judgment
Vlek, C. A. J., Kuyper, H., & Boer, H. (1985) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-70634-9_8 · Cited by 9
Traveling alone, reviewing differently: identifying distinctive hotel evaluation behaviors of solo travelers
Gim, J., Kim, S. I., Park, S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2024.2425103 · Cited by 8
Schlechte Nachrichten: "Fake News" in Politik und Öffentlichkeit
Jaster, R., & Lanius, D. (2020) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748901334-245 · Cited by 8
A Formal Model for Polarization under Confirmation Bias in Social Networks
Alvim, M. S., Amorim, B., Knight, S., Quintero, S., & Valencia, F. (2023) · Logical Methods in Computer Science · doi:10.46298/lmcs-19(1:18)2023 · Cited by 11
Steeling Ourselves: Intragroup Communication while Anticipating Intergroup Contact Evokes Defensive Intergroup Perceptions
Greijdanus, H., Postmes, T., Gordijn, E., & van Zomeren, M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131049 · Cited by 11
Are Classroom Discussions on Controversial Political Issues in Civic Education Lessons Cognitively Challenging? A Closer Look at Discussions with Assigned Positions
Gronostay, D. (2019) · Studia paedagogica · doi:10.5817/sp2019-4-4 · Cited by 9
Persuasion without polarization? Modelling persuasive argument communication in teams with strong faultlines
Feliciani, T., Flache, A., & Mäs, M. (2020) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-020-09315-8 · Cited by 9
Overloaded and Biased? Using Augmented Cognition to Understand the Interaction Between Information Overload and Cognitive Biases
Minas, R. K., & Crosby, M. E. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39955-3_23 · Cited by 8
Participation and Persuasion via Computer-Mediated Communication: Anonymous versus Identified Comments
Haines, R. P., Cao, L., & Haines, D. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 8
Polarization Effects in Group Decisions
Atas, M., Reiterer, S., Felfernig, A., et al. (2018) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3213586.3225242 · Cited by 8
Effects of communication, group selection, and social learning on risk and ambiguity attitudes: Experimental evidence from Bangladesh
Ahsanuzzaman, Priyo, A. K. K., & Nuzhat, K. A. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2021.101793 · Cited by 8
The Experiment and Foreign Policy Decision Making
Hermann, M. G., & Özkeçeci‐Taner, B. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921452.030 · Cited by 8
The Lives of Others: Social Rationality in Animals
Stevens, J. R., & King, A. J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0015 · Cited by 8
Pourquoi confronter les raisons ?
Girard, C. (2019) · Philosophiques · doi:10.7202/1062013ar · Cited by 8

Authors: Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H.
Affiliations: Hope College (US)
ORCID: Myers, David G.
Venue: Psychological Bulletin
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1976-07
Volume: 83
Issue: 4
Pages: 602-627
ISSN: 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
1939-1455
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
OpenAlex: W2004624112
Semantic Scholar: 3d20e757aa402632d574801181b23292981e3e51
Cited by: 1,102
References: 150
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 48
FWCI: 90.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, group decision making, attitude change, group discussion, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The group polarization phenomenon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks