The DOI matches its Crossref record; 245 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Abstract
Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The behaviour of individuals living in communities is regulated by moral norms and values 158-162 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“Haidt [26], for example, has argued that quick, automatic processes drive moral judgment while reflective processes play a more ad hoc role.”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Research from social psychology suggests that when individuals encounter others who use fundamentally different moral philosophies to guide behavior, we tend to judge those others as immoral, rather than simply using a different moral perspective (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012)).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Haidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Influential theories in psychology maintain that our moral sense is shaped by the social world (1)”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Most existing research takes a dyadic perspective to study the social transmission of morality; typically, one person (such as a child) is exposed to another's ideas (e.g., parent) through behavior or communication (1,2).”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As noted, other research suggests that moral judgments are often based on moral intuitions or heuristics [1], leading to quick and simple judgments.”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, disgust also affects our moral judgment [38,40,42].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This caveat might have contributed to the similar results in the meta-analyses on moral cognition and on ToM (rather than on empathy), given that emotion processing is thought to play a paramount role in real-world moral cognition (Krebs 2008; Tangney et al. 2007; Haidt 2001).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Haidt 2001
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 7×
“To say that moral reasoning is a conscious process means that the process is intentional, effortful, and controllable and that the reasoner is aware that it is going on (Bargh, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Black, 1998, Neuronal plasticity and the developing brain., 31
- Chen, 1999, The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context., 73
- D'Andrade, 1984, Cultural meaning systems., 88
- Darwin, 1998, The descent of man.
- de Waal, 1982, Chimpanzee politics.
- Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
- Hare, 1993, Without conscience.
- Harrison, 1967, Ethical objectivism., Vols. 3-4, 71
- Huttenlocher, 1994, Synaptogenesis, synapse elimination, and neural plasticity in human cerebral cortex., Vol. 27, 35
- Kagan, 1984, The nature of the child.
- Kant, 1959, Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (L. W. Beck. Trans.).
- Kohlberg, 1969, Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization., 347
- Lapsley, 1996, Moral psychology.
- Margolis, 1987, Patterns, thinking, and cognition.
- Mednick, 1982, Biology and violence., 21
- Mischel, 1976, A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation., 84
- Newcomb, 1943, Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community.
- Pavlov, 1927, Conditioned reflexes.
- Perkins, 1983, Difficulties in everyday reasoning., 177
- Premack, 1995, Origins of human social competence., 205
- Rozin, 2000, Disgust., 637
- Shweder, 1997, The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering., 119
- Singer, 1994, Rethinking life and death.
- Solomon, 1993, The philosophy of emotions., 3
- Solomon, 1991, A terror management theory of social behavior., 93
- Williams, 1967, Rationalism., Vols. 7-8, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 8,792
Nonrational processes in ethical decision making.
Rogerson, M. D., Gottlieb, M. C., Handelsman, M. M., Knapp, S. J., & Younggren, J. N. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0025215 · Cited by 140
Steinbauer, R., Renn, R. W., Taylor, R. R., & Njoroge, P. K. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1662-x · Cited by 141
Campbell, R., & Kumar, V. (2012) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/663980 · Cited by 140
Argandoña, A. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2311-8 · Cited by 139
Reasoning serves argumentation in children
Mercier, H. (2011) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.12.001 · Cited by 139
Morality in the Law: The Psychological Foundations of Citizens’ Desires to Punish Transgressions
Darley, J. M. (2009) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172335 · Cited by 139
The origins of religion : evolved adaptation or by-product?
Pyysiäinen, I., & HAUSER, M. D. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.007 · Cited by 139
Charismatic leadership: Eliciting and channeling follower emotions
Sy, T., Horton, C. J., & Riggio, R. E. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.008 · Cited by 135
Huemer, M. (2007) · Social Philosophy and Policy · doi:10.1017/s026505250808014x · Cited by 139
The Role of Moral Reasoning in Argumentation: Conscience, Character, and Care
Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2007) · Science & technology education library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_10 · Cited by 139
Through two lenses: A cultural–developmental approach to moral psychology
Jensen, L. A. (2008) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.11.001 · Cited by 138
Do ethicists steal more books?
Schwitzgebel, E. (2009) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080903409952 · Cited by 138
At the Heart of Morality Lies Folk Psychology
Guglielmo, S., Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2009) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/00201740903302600 · Cited by 137
Lee, J. S., & Kwak, D. H. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2544-1 · Cited by 137
Moral Emotions and Social Activism: The Case of Animal Rights
Herzog, H. A., & Golden, L. L. (2009) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01610.x · Cited by 137
Unpacking Intuition: A Process and Outcome Framework
Gore, J., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2011) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025069 · Cited by 137
Affective response to one's own moral violations
Berthoz, S., Grèzes, J., Armony, J. L., Passingham, R. E., & Dolan, R. J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.039 · Cited by 136
Moral Learning: Conceptual foundations and normative relevance
Railton, P. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.015 · Cited by 136
Reason, emotion and decision-making: risk and reward computation with feeling
Quartz, S. R. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.003 · Cited by 136
Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: the limited effect of a false cue
Sparks, A. M., & Barclay, P. (2013) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.05.001 · Cited by 135
The emotional dog does learn new tricks: A reply to Pizarro and Bloom (2003).
Haidt, J. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.197 · Cited by 137
Self-citationKennedy, J. A., Kray, L. J., & Ku, G. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.11.003 · Cited by 135
Goenka, S., & van Osselaer, S. M. J. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucz012 · Cited by 135
Deconstructing corporate hypocrisy: A delineation of its behavioral, moral, and attributional facets
Wagner, T., Korschun, D., & Troebs, C.-C. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.041 · Cited by 135
A toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism
Hornsey, M. J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01463-y · Cited by 135
Being of two minds: Ultimatum offers under cognitive constraints
Cappelletti, D., Güth, W., & Ploner, M. (2011) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.08.001 · Cited by 134
Strategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics
Tsoukas, H. (2017) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127017733142 · Cited by 134
Gilbert, P. (2019) · Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/papt.12226 · Cited by 134
Huddle, T. S. (2005) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200510000-00002 · Cited by 134
Cameron, C. D., Payne, B. K., & Doris, J. M. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.014 · Cited by 134
Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures.
Patil, I., Zucchelli, M. M., Kool, W., Campbell, S., Fornasier, F., Calò, M., Silani, G., Cikara, M., & Cushman, F. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000281 · Cited by 133
The Influence of Anger, Fear, and Emotion Regulation on Ethical Decision Making
Kligyte, V., Connelly, S., Thiel, C. E., & Devenport, L. D. (2013) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2013.814655 · Cited by 133
Islamist radicalisation: a root cause model
Veldhuis, T. M., & Staun, J. (2009) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 133
The role of emotions in judging the moral acceptability of risks
Roeser, S. (2006) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2006.02.001 · Cited by 132
Moral intuition: Its neural substrates and normative significance
Woodward, J., & Allman, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2007.12.003 · Cited by 132
Smith, R. S., Killgore, W. D. S., & Lane, R. D. (2017) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000376 · Cited by 132
Measuring Wisdom: Existing Approaches, Continuing Challenges, and New Developments
Glück, J. (2017) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx140 · Cited by 132
International perspectives on the pedagogy of climate change
Perkins, K. M., Munguía, N., Moure‐Eraso, R., Delakowitz, B., Giannetti, B. F., Liu, G., Nurunnabi, M., Will, M., & Velazquez, L. E. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.296 · Cited by 132
Morality in the Age of Artificially Intelligent Algorithms
Möser, C., den Hond, F., & Lindebaum, D. (2021) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2020.0287 · Cited by 132
The motivated use of moral principles
Pizarro, D. A. (2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e683162011-049 · Cited by 132
Hutcherson, C. A. C., Montaser‐Kouhsari, L., Woodward, J., & Rangel, A. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3402-14.2015 · Cited by 129
Simple Heuristics in a Social World
Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & the, A. R. G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.001.0001 · Cited by 131
Neuroticism and psychopathy predict brain activation during moral and nonmoral emotion regulation
Harenski, C. L., Kim, S. H., & Hamann, S. B. (2009) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.9.1.1 · Cited by 131
ACHIEVING SOCIAL LICENSE TO OPERATE USING STAKEHOLDER THEORY
Wilburn, K. M., & Wilburn, R. (2011) · Cited by 131
Bridging critical thinking and transformative learning: The role of perspective-taking
Southworth, J. (2022) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/14778785221090853 · Cited by 131
The five-factor model of the moral foundations theory is stable across WEIRD and non-WEIRD cultures
Doğruyol, B., Alper, S., & Yilmaz, O. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109547 · Cited by 130
Emotions in sensemaking: a change management perspective
Steigenberger, N. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/jocm-05-2014-0095 · Cited by 130
Toward a Human Emotions Taxonomy (Based on Their Automatic vs. Reflective Origin)
Jarymowicz, M., & Imbir, K. K. (2014) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073914555923 · Cited by 130
Blay, A. D., Gooden, E. S., Mellon, M. J., & Stevens, D. E. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3286-4 · Cited by 130
The strategic moral self: Self-presentation shapes moral dilemma judgments
Rom, S. C., & Conway, P. J. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.08.003 · Cited by 130
Moral Development in Business Ethics: An Examination and Critique
DeTienne, K. B., Ellertson, C. F., Ingerson, M., & Dudley, W. R. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04351-0 · Cited by 130
The Neurobiology of Moral Behavior: Review and Neuropsychiatric Implications
Mendez, M. F. (2009) · CNS Spectrums · doi:10.1017/s1092852900023853 · Cited by 130
Affect as Information about Liking, Efficacy, and Importance
Forgas, J. P. (2012) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203720752-14 · Cited by 130
What makes moral dilemma judgments “utilitarian” or “deontological”?
Gawronski, B., & Beer, J. S. (2016) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2016.1248787 · Cited by 130
“Doing well by doing good”? Ambivalent moral framing in organizations
Kreps, T. A., & Monin, B. (2011) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.008 · Cited by 129
Obfuscatory Relational Work and Disreputable Exchange
Rossman, G. (2014) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275114523418 · Cited by 129
Clark, C. J., & Winegard, B. M. (2020) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2020.1721233 · Cited by 128
van den Bos, K., & Maas, M. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209344628 · Cited by 128
An Eye for an Eye: Public Support for War Against Evildoers
Liberman, P. (2006) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081830606022x · Cited by 128
Moral Punishment in Everyday Life
Hofmann, W., Brandt, M. J., Wisneski, D. C., Rockenbach, B., & Skitka, L. J. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218775075 · Cited by 128
The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs
Bortolotti, L. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863984.001.0001 · Cited by 127
The motivation and inhibition of breaking the rules: Personal values structures predict unethicality
Feldman, G., Chao, M. M., Farh, J., & Bardi, A. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.09.003 · Cited by 127
The Role of Moral Commitments in Moral Judgment
Lombrozo, T. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01013.x · Cited by 127
When the future feels worse than the past: A temporal inconsistency in moral judgment.
Caruso, E. M. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0020757 · Cited by 127
Culture and the quest for universal principles in moral reasoning
Sachdeva, S. S., Singh, P., & Medin, D. L. (2011) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207594.2011.568486 · Cited by 127
Moral foundations underlying behavioral compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic
Chan, E. Y. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110463 · Cited by 127
Weaver, G. R., Reynolds, S. J., & Brown, M. E. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313511272 · Cited by 127
Around Consensual Nonmonogamies: Assessing Attitudes Toward Nonexclusive Relationships
Grunt-Mejer, K., & Campbell, C. M. (2015) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1010193 · Cited by 126
Free Association in Psychology and the Grid Elaboration Method
Joffé, H., & Elsey, J. W. B. (2014) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000014 · Cited by 126
Robot minds and human ethics: the need for a comprehensive model of moral decision making
Wallach, W. (2010) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9232-8 · Cited by 126
Ethical consumption and consumers’ decision making: the role of moral intuition
Zollo, L., Yoon, S., Rialti, R., & Ciappei, C. (2018) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2016-0745 · Cited by 126
How and Why Interviews Work: Ethnographic Interviews and Meso-level Public Culture
Rinaldo, R., & Guhin, J. (2019) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124119882471 · Cited by 126
How does morality work in the brain? A functional and structural perspective of moral behavior
Pascual, L., Rodrigues, P., & Gallardo‐Pujol, D. (2013) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2013.00065 · Cited by 125
Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611414587 · Cited by 125
Brown, J. O., Hays, J. B., & Stuebs, M. T. (2016) · Accounting and the Public Interest · doi:10.2308/apin-51675 · Cited by 125
The Emergence of Moral Leadership
Solinger, O. N., Jansen, P. G. W., & Cornelissen, J. (2019) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0263 · Cited by 125
van den Bos, K. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050953 · Cited by 125
Transgressors, victims, and cry babies: Is basic moral judgment spared in autism?
Leslie, A. M., Mallon, R., & DiCorcia, J. A. (2006) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910600992197 · Cited by 124
Socratic Questions and Aristotelian Answers: A Virtue-Based Approach to Business Ethics
Hartman, E. M. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9337-5 · Cited by 124
Psychological and social factors associated with wastewater reuse emotional discomfort
Wester, J., Timpano, K. R., Çek, D., Lieberman, D., Fieldstone, S. C., & Broad, K. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.003 · Cited by 124
Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence
Leidner, B., & Castano, E. (2011) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.846 · Cited by 124
Deontological coherence: A framework for commonsense moral reasoning.
Holyoak, K. J., & Powell, D. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000075 · Cited by 124
How does this make you feel? A comparison of four affect induction procedures
Zhang, X., Yu, H., & Barrett, L. F. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00689 · Cited by 124
Coleman, S. R. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139035354 · Cited by 124
On the overwhelming importance of shaping the far future
Beckstead, N. (2013) · Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) · doi:10.7282/t35m649t · Cited by 124
Turiel, E. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy113 · Cited by 127
Religious Beliefs as Reflective Elaborations on Intuitions: A Modified Dual-Process Model
Baumard, N., & Boyer, P. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721413478610 · Cited by 123
Haidt's Moral Intuitionist Theory: A Psychological and Philosophical Critique
Saltzstein, H. D., & Kasachkoff, T. (2004) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.273 · Cited by 123
The Actor–Observer Bias and Moral Intuitions: Adding Fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong’s Fire
Nadelhoffer, T., & Feltz, A. (2008) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-008-9015-7 · Cited by 123
A Dual-Processing Model of Moral Whistleblowing in Organizations
Watts, L. L., & Buckley, M. R. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2913-9 · Cited by 122
Skarlicki, D. P., van Jaarsveld, D. D., Shao, R., Song, Y. H., & Wang, M. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000034 · Cited by 122
Blame It on the Self-Driving Car: How Autonomous Vehicles Can Alter Consumer Morality
Gill, T. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucaa018 · Cited by 122
Białek, M., & Neys, W. D. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005696 · Cited by 122
Emotions as a mechanism for boundedly rational agents: The fast and frugal way
Muramatsu, R., & Hanoch, Y. (2004) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2004.03.001 · Cited by 122
War as a moral imperative (not just practical politics by other means)
Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2384 · Cited by 121
Testimony and interrogation of minors: Assumptions about maturity and morality.
Kostelnik, J. O., Reppucci, N. D., & Meyer, J. R. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.4.286 · Cited by 121
Liberating Reason From the Passions
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Antonenko, O., & John, O. P. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611434747 · Cited by 121
Tainting the soul: Purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide
Rottman, J., Kelemen, D. A., & Young, L. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.007 · Cited by 120
Fast or Slow: Sociological Implications of Measuring Dual-Process Cognition
Moore, R. (2017) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v4.a9 · Cited by 120
The UK government’s imaginative use of evidence to make policy
Cairney, P. (2018) · British Politics · doi:10.1057/s41293-017-0068-2 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-834
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2123791568
- Semantic Scholar
- b74e8da297574fd071d4b48b7aa94ea16861aea6
- Cited by
- 8,048
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 365 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 497 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 535 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 408 · 2015: 416 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 369
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03da012606-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-RO3-DA12606-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- moral judgment, moral reasoning, social intuitionism, moral intuitions, automated assessment, evolutionary psychology of morality
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Morals, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Social Values, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
