The DOI matches its Crossref record; 245 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Abstract
Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The behaviour of individuals living in communities is regulated by moral norms and values 158-162 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“Haidt [26], for example, has argued that quick, automatic processes drive moral judgment while reflective processes play a more ad hoc role.”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Research from social psychology suggests that when individuals encounter others who use fundamentally different moral philosophies to guide behavior, we tend to judge those others as immoral, rather than simply using a different moral perspective (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012)).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Haidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Influential theories in psychology maintain that our moral sense is shaped by the social world (1)”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Most existing research takes a dyadic perspective to study the social transmission of morality; typically, one person (such as a child) is exposed to another's ideas (e.g., parent) through behavior or communication (1,2).”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As noted, other research suggests that moral judgments are often based on moral intuitions or heuristics [1], leading to quick and simple judgments.”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, disgust also affects our moral judgment [38,40,42].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This caveat might have contributed to the similar results in the meta-analyses on moral cognition and on ToM (rather than on empathy), given that emotion processing is thought to play a paramount role in real-world moral cognition (Krebs 2008; Tangney et al. 2007; Haidt 2001).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Haidt 2001
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 7×
“To say that moral reasoning is a conscious process means that the process is intentional, effortful, and controllable and that the reasoner is aware that it is going on (Bargh, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Black, 1998, Neuronal plasticity and the developing brain., 31
- Chen, 1999, The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context., 73
- D'Andrade, 1984, Cultural meaning systems., 88
- Darwin, 1998, The descent of man.
- de Waal, 1982, Chimpanzee politics.
- Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
- Hare, 1993, Without conscience.
- Harrison, 1967, Ethical objectivism., Vols. 3-4, 71
- Huttenlocher, 1994, Synaptogenesis, synapse elimination, and neural plasticity in human cerebral cortex., Vol. 27, 35
- Kagan, 1984, The nature of the child.
- Kant, 1959, Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (L. W. Beck. Trans.).
- Kohlberg, 1969, Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization., 347
- Lapsley, 1996, Moral psychology.
- Margolis, 1987, Patterns, thinking, and cognition.
- Mednick, 1982, Biology and violence., 21
- Mischel, 1976, A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation., 84
- Newcomb, 1943, Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community.
- Pavlov, 1927, Conditioned reflexes.
- Perkins, 1983, Difficulties in everyday reasoning., 177
- Premack, 1995, Origins of human social competence., 205
- Rozin, 2000, Disgust., 637
- Shweder, 1997, The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering., 119
- Singer, 1994, Rethinking life and death.
- Solomon, 1993, The philosophy of emotions., 3
- Solomon, 1991, A terror management theory of social behavior., 93
- Williams, 1967, Rationalism., Vols. 7-8, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 8,792
Can Unintended Side Effects Be Intentional? Resolving a Controversy Over Intentionality and Morality
Guglielmo, S., & Malle, B. F. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210386733 · Cited by 166
Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency
Paharia, N., Kassam, K., Greene, J. D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.002 · Cited by 166
A Virtue-Based Framework to Support Putting AI Ethics into Practice
Hagendorff, T. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00553-z · Cited by 166
People's intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice.
Inbar, Y., Cone, J., & Gilovich, T. D. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020215 · Cited by 165
Situating moral disengagement: Motivated reasoning in meat consumption and substitution
Graça, J., Calheiros, M. M., & Oliveira, A. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.042 · Cited by 165
Morality in Groups: On the Social‐Regulatory Functions of Right and Wrong
Ellemers, N., & van den Bos, K. (2012) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12001 · Cited by 164
The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care
Robertson, D., Snarey, J., Ousley, O., Harenski, K. A., Bowman, F. D., Gilkey, R., & Kilts, C. D. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.014 · Cited by 164
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D. (2009) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0086 · Cited by 164
Wilson, T. D. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01143.x · Cited by 163
On Justifying Punishment: The Discrepancy Between Words and Actions
Carlsmith, K. M. (2008) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0068-x · Cited by 163
Intermediation Reduces Punishment (and Reward)
Coffman, L. C. (2011) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.3.4.77 · Cited by 163
Paharia, N., Vohs, K. D., & Deshpandé, R. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.001 · Cited by 162
The role of a “common is moral” heuristic in the stability and change of moral norms.
Lindström, B., Jangard, S., Selbing, I., & Olsson, A. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000365 · Cited by 162
The cognitive and cultural foundations of moral behavior
Purzycki, B. G., Pisor, A. C., Apicella, C. L., Atkinson, Q. D., Cohen, E. E. A., Henrich, J., McElreath, R. L., McNamara, R. A., Norenzayan, A., Willard, A. K., et al. (2018) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.04.004 · Cited by 162
Keltner, D. J., & Lerner, J. S. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001009 · Cited by 164
Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents
van Wynsberghe, A., & Robbins, S. (2019) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0030-8 · Cited by 161
“Experiments in moral psychology show us that human morality is deeply influenced by irrelevant situational factors (Doris 1998; Merritt 2000), is driven by emotion (Haidt 2001; Haidt and Joseph 2008), and influenced by our evolutionary past (Street 2006).”
BackgroundHiggins, E. T., & Cornwell, J. F. M. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.04.005 · Cited by 162
Moral Judgments in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Sullivan, Y. W., & Wamba, S. F. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05053-w · Cited by 161
The Costs and Benefits of Calculation and Moral Rules
Bennis, W. M., Medin, D. L., & Bartels, D. M. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610362354 · Cited by 161
Religiosity, political orientation, and consequentialist moral thinking
Piazza, J., & Sousa, P. (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550613492826 · Cited by 160
Stich, S. G. W. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.001.0001 · Cited by 160
Narvaez, D. F. (2006) · doi:10.4324/9781410615336-38 · Cited by 160
Why Facts Are Not Enough: Understanding and Managing the Motivated Rejection of Science
Hornsey, M. J. (2020) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721420969364 · Cited by 159
Emotions and transformative learning for sustainability: a systematic review
Grund, J., Singer‐Brodowski, M., & Büssing, A. G. (2023) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-023-01439-5 · Cited by 159
Testing a Dual-Process Model of Media Enjoyment and Appreciation
Lewis, R. J., Tamborini, R., & Weber, R. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12101 · Cited by 158
The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment
Kahane, G., Wiech, K., Shackel, N. A., Farias, M., Savulescu, J., & Tracey, I. (2011) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsr005 · Cited by 158
When Due Process Is of No Consequence: Moral Mandates and Presumed Defendant Guilt or Innocence
Skitka, L. J., & Houston, D. A. (2001) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1014372008257 · Cited by 158
Narratives, Imperatives, and Moral Reasoning
Bénabou, R., Falk, A., & Jean Tirole, Z. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24798 · Cited by 158
Colston, H. L. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316226414 · Cited by 157
Hendricks, V. F., & Vestergaard, M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00813-0 · Cited by 157
Epley, N., & Caruso, E. M. (2004) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000027408.72713.45 · Cited by 157
How power influences moral thinking.
Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015437 · Cited by 157
Socrates, Skinner, and Aristotle: Three Ways of Thinking About Culture in Action1
Vaisey, S. (2008) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00079.x · Cited by 156
Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0891 · Cited by 156
Jordan, J., & Rand, D. G. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000186 · Cited by 156
The Importance of Context in Moral Judgments
Schein, C. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620904083 · Cited by 156
Enabling Courageous Collective Action: Conversations from United Airlines Flight 93
Quinn, R. W., & Worline, M. C. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0331 · Cited by 155
What Is a “Fair” Price? Ethics as Sensemaking
Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.0968 · Cited by 155
Gummerum, M., Keller, M., Takezawa, M., & Mata, J. (2008) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01143.x · Cited by 155
Constructing a Shared Governance Logic: The Role of Emotions in Enabling Dually Embedded Agency
Fan, G., & Zietsma, C. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0402 · Cited by 155
My Anger Is Your Gain, My Contempt Your Loss: Explaining Consumer Responses to Corporate Wrongdoing
Romani, S., Grappi, S., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2013) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20664 · Cited by 154
On dual processing and heuristic approaches to moral cognition
Lapsley, D. K., & Hill, P. L. (2008) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240802227486 · Cited by 154
Organizational Justice and Behavioral Ethics: Promises and Prospects
Cropanzano, R., & Stein, J. H. (2009) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200919211 · Cited by 154
The Moral Psychology of Raceless, Genderless Strangers
Hester, N., & Gray, K. J. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619885840 · Cited by 154
Emotions and Attributions of Legal Responsibility and Blame: A Research Review.
Feigenson, N. R., & Park, J. (2006) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9026-z · Cited by 154
Moral Cognitions and Prosocial Responding in Adolescence
Eisenberg, N., Morris, A. S., McDaniel, B., & Spinrad, T. L. (2009) · Handbook of Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001009 · Cited by 153
Chapter 8 Moral Identity, Moral Functioning, and the Development of Moral Character
Narvaez, D. F., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)00408-8 · Cited by 153
The Bias That Divides Us: The Science and Politics of Myside Thinking
Stanovich, K. E. (2021) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13367.001.0001 · Cited by 152
Moral Rules, the Moral Sentiments, and Behavior: Toward a Theory of an Optimal Moral System
Kaplow, L., & Shavell, S. (2007) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/519927 · Cited by 152
Russell, G., & Norwich, B. (2012) · Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1359104510365203 · Cited by 152
On intuitional stability: The clear, the strong, and the paradigmatic
Wright, J. C. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.02.003 · Cited by 152
Moors, A. C., Conley, T. D., Edelstein, R. S., & Chopik, W. J. (2014) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407514529065 · Cited by 152
Influence of bodily harm on neural correlates of semantic and moral decision-making
Heekeren, H. R., Wartenburger, I., Schmidt, H., Prehn, K., Schwintowski, H.-P., & Villringer, A. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.026 · Cited by 152
Toward a Theory Relating Political Discourse, Media, and Public Opinion
Simon, A. F., & Jerit, J. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00342.x · Cited by 152
Implications of Affective and Social Neuroscience for Educational Theory
Immordino‐Yang, M. H. (2011) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00713.x · Cited by 152
Swann, W. B., Gómez, Á., Buhrmester, M. D., López‐Rodríguez, L., Jiménez, J., & Vázquez, A. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035809 · Cited by 151
Rules or Consequences? The Role of Ethical Mind-Sets in Moral Dynamics
Cornelissen, G., Bashshur, M. R., Rode, J., & Menestrel, M. L. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612457376 · Cited by 151
Foreign language affects the contribution of intentions and outcomes to moral judgment
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.010 · Cited by 151
The Artificial Moral Advisor. The “Ideal Observer” Meets Artificial Intelligence
Giubilini, A., & Savulescu, J. (2017) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0285-z · Cited by 151
What Dilemma? Moral Evaluation Shapes Factual Belief
Liu, B. S., & Ditto, P. H. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550612456045 · Cited by 151
Rethinking Culture and Cognition
Cerulo, K. A., Leschziner, V., & Shepherd, H. R. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-072320-095202 · Cited by 151
The Dark Side of Moral Conviction
Skitka, L. J., & Mullen, E. (2002) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2002.00024.x · Cited by 150
O'Rourke, J., Barnes, J., Deaton, A., Fulks, K., Ryan, K., & Rettinger, D. A. (2010) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508420903482616 · Cited by 150
Pagliaro, S., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211406906 · Cited by 150
Avramova, Y. R., & Inbar, Y. (2013) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1216 · Cited by 153
Sweeping dishonesty under the rug: How unethical actions lead to forgetting of moral rules.
Shu, L. L., & Gino, F. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028381 · Cited by 150
Third-party attitudes toward sibling incest
Fessler, D. M. T., & Navarrete, C. D. (2004) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.05.004 · Cited by 149
Everyone's a Little Bit Biased (Even Physicians)
Cain, D. M. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.24.2893 · Cited by 149
Just Feelings? The Role of Affect in the Formation of Organizational Fairness Judgments
Barsky, A. P., Kaplan, S. A., & Beal, D. J. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310376325 · Cited by 149
The Psychological Foundations of Everyday Morality and Moral Expertise
Narvaez, D. F., & Lapsley, D. K. (2021) · University of Notre Dame Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.21995997.9 · Cited by 149
Moody experts — How mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring
Englich, B., & Soder, K. (2009) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000693 · Cited by 149
The Case for Metaphor in Political Reasoning and Cognition
Bougher, L. D. (2012) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00865.x · Cited by 150
Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian
Trémolière, B., Neys, W. D., & Bonnefon, J. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.011 · Cited by 147
Debunking evolutionary debunking of ethical realism
FitzPatrick, W. J. (2014) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0295-y · Cited by 147
Miller, R. M., Hannikainen, I. R., & Cushman, F. A. (2014) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0035361 · Cited by 147
The psychology of moral reasoning
Bucciarelli, M., Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2008) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500001479 · Cited by 147
Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Design
Roeser, S. (2010) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9236-0 · Cited by 147
Anger, Fear, or Sadness: Faculty Members' Emotional Reactions to Collective Pay Disadvantage
Smith, H. J., Cronin, T. J., & Kessler, T. (2008) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00624.x · Cited by 147
Not so innocent: Does seeing one's own capability for wrongdoing predict forgiveness?
Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Zell, A. L., Kraft, A. J., & Witvliet, C. V. O. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.495 · Cited by 146
Guilt-Specific Processing in the Prefrontal Cortex
Wagner, U., N’Diaye, K., Ethofer, T., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr016 · Cited by 146
Martín, S., Kish-Gephart, J. J., & Detert, J. R. (2014) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386613518576 · Cited by 146
Zwolinski, M. (2008) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200818327 · Cited by 146
Currie, G. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199656615.001.0001 · Cited by 148
Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms
Tannenbaum, D., Uhlmann, E. L., & Diermeier, D. A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.010 · Cited by 145
Investigating the Neural and Cognitive Basis of Moral Luck: It’s Not What You Do but What You Know
Young, L., Nichols, S., & Saxe, R. R. (2010) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0027-y · Cited by 145
Lying to Level the Playing Field: Why People May Dishonestly Help or Hurt Others to Create Equity
Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0792-2 · Cited by 145
Ford, M. T., Wang, Y., Jin, J., & Eisenberger, R. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000075 · Cited by 145
Waiting to Inhale: Reducing Stigma in the Medical Cannabis Industry
Lashley, K., & Pollock, T. G. (2019) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839219851501 · Cited by 146
Affordances and reflexivity in ethical life: An ethnographic stance
Keane, W. (2014) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/1463499614521721 · Cited by 144
Automatic ethics: The effects of implicit assumptions and contextual cues on moral behavior.
Reynolds, S. J., Leavitt, K., & DeCelles, K. A. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019411 · Cited by 144
The curious tale of Julie and Mark: Unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect
Royzman, E. B., Kim, K., & Leeman, R. F. (2015) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s193029750000512x · Cited by 143
Institutions as cognitive media between strategic interactions and individual beliefs
Aoki, M. (2011) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781783476213.00027 · Cited by 143
Just a Game? Unjustified Virtual Violence Produces Guilt in Empathetic Players
Hartmann, T., Toz, E., & Brandon, M. (2010) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2010.524912 · Cited by 142
Bandes, S. A., & Blumenthal, J. A. (2012) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173825 · Cited by 142
Attitudes, values and moral reasoning as predictors of delinquency
Tarry, H., & Emler, N. (2007) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1348/026151006x113671 · Cited by 142
Sznycer, D., Seal, M. F. L., Sell, A. N., Lim, J., Porat, R., Shalvi, S., Halperin, E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1703801114 · Cited by 142
Attitudes towards sexual offenders: What do we know, and why are they important?
Harper, C. A., Hogue, T. E., & Bartels, R. M. (2017) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.011 · Cited by 141
Signaling emotion and reason in cooperation.
Levine, E. E., Barasch, A., Rand, D. G., Berman, J. Z., & Small, D. A. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000399 · Cited by 141
Consumption Ethics: A Review and Analysis of Future Directions for Interdisciplinary Research
Carrington, M., Chatzidakis, A., Goworek, H., & Shaw, D. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04425-4 · Cited by 141
Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles
Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. (2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-2295 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-834
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2123791568
- Semantic Scholar
- b74e8da297574fd071d4b48b7aa94ea16861aea6
- Cited by
- 8,048
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 365 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 497 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 535 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 408 · 2015: 416 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 369
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03da012606-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-RO3-DA12606-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- moral judgment, moral reasoning, social intuitionism, moral intuitions, automated assessment, evolutionary psychology of morality
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Morals, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Social Values, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review