The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Word learning as Bayesian inference.
Abstract
The authors present a Bayesian framework for understanding how adults and children learn the meanings of words. The theory explains how learners can generalize meaningfully from just one or a few positive examples of a novel word's referents, by making rational inductive inferences that integrate prior knowledge about plausible word meanings with the statistical structure of the observed examples. The theory addresses shortcomings of the two best known approaches to modeling word learning, based on deductive hypothesis elimination and associative learning. Three experiments with adults and children test the Bayesian account's predictions in the context of learning words for object categories at multiple levels of a taxonomic hierarchy. Results provide strong support for the Bayesian account over competing accounts, in terms of both quantitative model fits and the ability to explain important qualitative phenomena. Several extensions of the basic theory are discussed, illustrating the broader potential for Bayesian models of word learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings
Gleitman, L. (1990) · Language Acquisition · doi:10.1207/s15327817la0101_2 · Cited by 1,783
Topics in semantic representation
Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.211 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationLanguage Acquisition and Conceptual Development
(2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620669 · Cited by 1,082
Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning
Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Kemp, C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009 · Cited by 880 · cited 1×
“In principle, both of these questions can be addressed within a hierarchical Bayesian framework (Kemp, Perfors, & Tenenbaum, 2004, 2007; Tenenbaum et al., 2006), an extension of the approach we have developed here to include hypothesis spaces at multiple levels of abstraction, with probabilistic…”
BackgroundSelf-citationDistributional Information: A Powerful Cue for Acquiring Syntactic Categories
Redington, M., Chater, N., & Finch, S. (1998) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2204_2 · Cited by 535 · cited 1×
“Regier (2003) suggested an alternative way in which mutual exclusivity could enter into a Bayesian analysis, via an alternative formulation of the likelihood.”
BackgroundInfants' Reliance on a Social Criterion for Establishing Word-Object Relations
Baldwin, D. A., Markman, E. M., Bill, B., Desjardins, R. N., Irwin, J. M., & Tidball, G. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131771 · Cited by 398
Cited by
Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction
Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3050 · Cited by 2,817
Self-citationBuilding machines that learn and think like people
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x16001837 · Cited by 2,550
Self-citationHow to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192788 · Cited by 1,815
Self-citationPredicting pragmatic reasoning in language games
Frank, M. C., & Goodman, N. D. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1218633 · Cited by 868
Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning
Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Kemp, C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009 · Cited by 880
Self-citationHaidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650
Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases
Griffiths, T. L., Chater, N., Kemp, C., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.004 · Cited by 568
Self-citationJones, M., & Love, B. C. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10003134 · Cited by 533
A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning
Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210701802071 · Cited by 469
Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation
Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1216438110 · Cited by 407
Emotion words, emotion concepts, and emotional development in children: A constructionist hypothesis
Hoemann, K., Xu, F., & Barrett, L. F. (2019) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000686 · Cited by 354
Self-citationStatistical Learning: From Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules
Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412436806 · Cited by 348
Continual learning of context-dependent processing in neural networks
Zeng, G., Chen, Y., Cui, B., & Yu, S. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0080-x · Cited by 309
The Infancy of the Human Brain
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Spelke, E. S. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.026 · Cited by 264
Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning
Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0014282 · Cited by 259
Self-citationSobel, D. M., & Kushnir, T. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0034191 · Cited by 225
Statistical Measures for Usage‐Based Linguistics
Gries, S. T., & Ellis, N. C. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12119 · Cited by 224
How Robust Are Probabilistic Models of Higher-Level Cognition?
Marcus, G. F., & Davis, E. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613495418 · Cited by 195
Variability and Consistency in Early Language Learning: The Wordbank Project
Frank, M. C., Braginsky, M., Yurovsky, D., & Marchman, V. A. (2021) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11577.001.0001 · Cited by 206
Bayesian modelling of Jumping-to-Conclusions bias in delusional patients
Moutoussis, M., Bentall, R. P., El-Deredy, W., & Dayan, P. (2011) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546805.2010.548678 · Cited by 137
Rational variability in children's causal inferences: the sampling hypothesis
Denison, S., Bonawitz, E., Gopnik, A., & Griffiths, T. L. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.010 · Cited by 126
Infants are rational constructivist learners
Xu, F., & Kushnir, T. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412469396 · Cited by 119
Self-citationWhat does it take to learn a word?
Samuelson, L. K., & McMurray, B. (2017) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1421 · Cited by 110
When redundancy is useful: A Bayesian approach to “overinformative” referring expressions
Degen, J., Hawkins, R. D., Graf, C., Kreiss, E., & Goodman, N. D. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000186 · Cited by 90
Learning a commonsense moral theory
Kleiman-Weiner, M., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.005 · Cited by 53
Self-citationGigerenzer, G. (2020) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12480 · Cited by 48
Grounded Language Learning Fast and Slow
Hill, F., Tieleman, O., von Glehn, T., Wong, N., Merzic, H., & Clark, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.01719 · Cited by 35
Guo, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.582259 · Cited by 12
(2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108339216 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-272
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2016429292
- Cited by
- 1,033
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 62.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
