Cited by 584Behavioral Health and InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorMedia Influence and Health

The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating

Conner, Mark, Norman, Paul, Bell, Russell·2002·Health Psychology

Abstract

Application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to healthy eating in 144 health promotion clinic attendees is reported. Respondents completed self-report TPB measures after the clinic (Time 1) and 6 months later (Time 2) with a measure of perceived past behavior. Intention stability was assessed on Time 1-2 differences. Six years later (Time 3), respondents completed measures of healthy eating intentions and behavior. Intentions were predicted by attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and perceived past behavior (cross-sectionally). Healthy eating behavior (Time 3) was predicted from intentions (Time 2). As intention stability increased, intentions and perceived past behavior became stronger and weaker predictors of behavior, respectively. Implications for understanding health cognitions in long-term performance of health behavior are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.21.2.194

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intention constitutes a motivational force for subsequent behavior that predicts healthy eating behavior.

    “Intention, in turn, constitutes a motivational force for subsequent behavior (Fishbein & Ajzen, 2010;Sheeran, 2002) that predicts (healthy) eating behavior (Conner, Norman, & Bell, 2002).”
  • The research team developed and tested items to evaluate the theoretical constructs of intentions, attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.

    “For this study, the research team developed and tested items to evaluate the theoretical constructs of intentions, attitudes, norms, and perceived behavior control based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (Conner et al., 2002), which has often been used for other environmentally related behavior change studies (Russell et al., 2017).”

    From Waste watchers: A food waste reduction intervention among households in Arizona (2021) · cites this paper as Conner et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conner, M., Norman, P., & Bell, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2002
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
194-201
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2067728341
Cited by
584
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 34
FWCI
16.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
theory of planned behavior, healthy eating, dietary habits, behavioral intention, perceived behavioral control, attitudes, health cognitions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, England, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Middle Aged, Motivation, Psychological Theory, Regression Analysis, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review