Cited by 2,525Behavioral Health and InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesHealth Policy Implementation Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions

Open access
Abraham, Charles, Michie, Susan·2008·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Without standardized definitions of the techniques included in behavior change interventions, it is difficult to faithfully replicate effective interventions and challenging to identify techniques contributing to effectiveness across interventions. This research aimed to develop and test a theory-linked taxonomy of generally applicable behavior change techniques (BCTs). DESIGN: Twenty-six BCTs were defined. Two psychologists used a 5-page coding manual to independently judge the presence or absence of each technique in published intervention descriptions and in intervention manuals. RESULTS: Three systematic reviews yielded 195 published descriptions. Across 78 reliability tests (i.e., 26 techniques applied to 3 reviews), the average kappa per technique was 0.79, with 93% of judgments being agreements. Interventions were found to vary widely in the range and type of techniques used, even when targeting the same behavior among similar participants. The average agreement for intervention manuals was 85%, and a comparison of BCTs identified in 13 manuals and 13 published articles describing the same interventions generated a technique correspondence rate of 74%, with most mismatches (73%) arising from identification of a technique in the manual but not in the article. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of developing standardized definitions of BCTs included in behavioral interventions and highlight problematic variability in the reporting of intervention content.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [17]17. Durantini, M. R., Albarracín, D., Earl, A., & Mitchell, A. L. (2006). Conceptualizing the influence of social agents of change: A meta-analysis of HIV prevention interventions across different genders, ethnicities, ages, and behaviorally-defined groups. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 212- 248.
  2. [34]34. Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W. & Eccles, M. (under review). From theory to intervention: mapping theoretical constructs to behaviour change techniques.
  3. [54]54. Prompt review of behavioral goals (CT) Review and/or reconsideration of previously set goals or intentions.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,018

Metadata

Authors
Abraham, C., & Michie, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2008
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
379-387
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2057181385
Cited by
2,525
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 230 · 2019: 181 · 2018: 187 · 2017: 176 · 2016: 187 · 2015: 197 · 2014: 166 · 2013: 167 · 2012: 141
FWCI
105.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
behaviour change techniques, taxonomy (general classification scheme), behavioral interventions, intervention reporting, coding reliability, intervention manual, intervention replication
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Psychotherapy, Health Behavior, Bibliometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review