Cited by 119Behavioral Health and InterventionsPhysical Activity and HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Correlates of reduced exercise behaviour in depression: the role of motivational and volitional deficits.

Krämer, Lena V., Helmes, Almut W., Seelig, Harald, Fuchs, Reinhard, Bengel, Jürgen·2014·Psychology & Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed at uncovering the correlates of reduced exercise in depressive patients. On the basis of the Health Action Process Approach (Schwarzer, 2011 ), we hypothesised that reduced exercise in depressive patients can be explained by motivational deficits and volitional deficits. DESIGN: A longitudinal sample of 56 clinically depressive outpatients was compared to a sample of 56 parallelised non-depressive controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported intention, exercise, and motivational and volitional HAPA variables were measured with self-report questionnaires at baseline and four-week follow-up. RESULTS: Depressive patients showed a motivational deficit: they had significantly reduced intentions to exercise compared to non-depressive participants, and they suffered from reduced self-efficacy and increased negative outcome expectations. No differences were found with regard to positive outcome expectations. Depressive patients also showed a volitional deficit: depressive high-intenders were less capable of transforming their intention into action than non-depressive high-intenders. They produced less action plans, had less maintenance self-efficacy and were more easily distracted by barriers. CONCLUSION: The lower level of exercise among depressive patients is partly due to motivational, partly to volitional deficits. Interventions should be stage-matched and should focus on pessimistic beliefs (negative outcome expectations, self-efficacy) and planning deficits in depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2014.918978

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krämer, L. V., Helmes, A. W., Seelig, H., Fuchs, R., & Bengel, J.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Krämer, Lena V.
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2014-07-15
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1206-1225
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2024853103
Cited by
119
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, exercise behavior, motivational deficits, Health Action Process Approach, exercise intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, action planning, barriers to exercise, stage-matched intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Volition, Exercise, Case-Control Studies, Self Efficacy, Intention, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review