Cited by 199Memory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and CortisolMemory Processes and Influences

The contribution of adrenal and reproductive hormones to the opposing effects of stress on trace conditioning males versus females.

Wood, Gwendolyn E., Beylin, Anna V., Shors, Tracey J.·2001·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Exposure to an acute stressful experience facilitates classical conditioning in male rats but impairs conditioning in female rats (T. J. Shors, C. Lewczyk, M. Paczynski, P. R. Mathew, & J. Pickett, 1998; G. E. Wood & T. J. Shors, 1998). The authors report that these effects extend to performance on the hippocampal-dependent task of trace conditioning. The stress-induced impairment of conditioning in females was evident immediately, 24 hr and 48 hr after stress, depending on the stage of estrus. Moreover, the effect could be reactivated days later by reexposure to the stressful context. Corticosterone levels correlated with overall performance in males but not in females. Unlike the effect seen in males, adrenalectomy did not prevent the stress-induced effect on conditioning in females. These data indicate that exposure to the same experience can have opposite effects on learning in males versus females and that these opposing effects are mediated by differing hormonal systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.115.1.175

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In tests of acute stress or aversive conditioning, stress enhances learning in males and impairs it in females.

    “in tests of acute stress or aversive conditioning, stress enhances learning in males and impairs it in females89, 90”

    From Neurobiology of resilience (2012) · cites this paper as [90]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, G. E., Beylin, A. V., & Shors, T. J.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2001
Volume
115
Issue
1
Pages
175-187
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2039652271
Cited by
198
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH059740, MH-59970, MH-59740, R01MH059970)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
stress, trace conditioning, sex differences, hippocampus-dependent learning, corticosterone, adrenalectomy, estrous cycle, reproductive hormones, adrenal hormones, classical conditioning, rats
MeSH terms
Adrenalectomy, Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Corticosterone, Estrogens, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Progesterone, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review