Cited by 260Advanced Glycation End Products researchPotato Plant ResearchNutritional Studies and Diet

Dietary advanced glycation end products and their relevance for human health

Open access
Nowotny, Kerstin, Schröter, David, Schreiner, Monika, Grune, Tilman·2018·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

Due to their bioactivity and harmful potential, advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are discussed to affect human health. AGEs are compounds formed endogenously in the human body andexogenously, especially, in foods while thermal processing. In contrast to endogenous AGEs, dietary AGEs are formed in much higher extent. However, their risk potential is also depending on absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination. For over 10 years an intense debate on the risk of dietary AGEs on human health is going on. On the one hand, studies provided evidence that dietary AGEs contribute to clinical outcomes. On the other hand, human studies failed to observe any association. Because it was not possible to draw a final conclusion, the call for new interdisciplinary approaches arose. In this review, we will give an overview on the current state of scientific knowledge in this field. In particular, we focus on (I) the occurrence of AGEs in foods and the daily uptake of AGEs, (II) contribution to endogenous levels and (III) the effect on health-/disease-related biomarkers in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2018.06.005

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 121 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nowotny, K., Schröter, D., Schreiner, M., & Grune, T.
Affiliations
  • German Institute of Human Nutrition (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (DE)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
Corresponding author
Grune, Tilman
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
47
Pages
55-66
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811317264
Cited by
255
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Leibniz Research Alliance "Sustainable Food Production and Healthy Nutrition"
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Potato Plant Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
advanced glycation end products, dietary AGEs, thermal food processing, disease risk
MeSH terms
Aging, Diet, Health Status, Humans, Glycation End Products, Advanced

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review