The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
Abstract
Principles for reporting analyses using structural equation modeling are reviewed, with the goal of supplying readers with complete and accurate information. It is recommended that every report give a detailed justification of the model used, along with plausible alternatives and an account of identifiability. Nonnormality and missing data problems should also be addressed. A complete set of parameters and their standard errors is desirable, and it will often be convenient to supply the correlation matrix and discrepancies, as well as goodness-of-fit indices, so that readers can exercise independent critical judgment. A survey of fairly representative studies compares recent practice with the principles of reporting recommended here.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The final valid questionnaires of this study were 219 cases, which satisfied the minimum requirement of the sample size of 200 people for structural equation modelling (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
From The Relationship Between Knowledge, Psychological Flexibility, Anxiety and Healthy Behaviour in Stroke Patients: A Chain Mediation Model. (2026) · cites this paper as McDonald and Ho 2002
In the citing paper
“Good model fit is indicated by χ ²/df below three, CFI and NNFI values greater than .90, and RMSEA and SRMR below .08 (Hu and Bentler 1999; McDonald and Ho 2002).”
From Awareness Versus Un-Clinging: Which Matters in Mindfulness? (2017) · cites this paper as McDonald and Ho 2002
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,944
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,475
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Arbuckle, 1997, Amos user's guide.
- Bentler, 1985, Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program.
- Bentler, 1995, EQS structural equations programs manual.
- Hartmann, 1992, The CALIS procedure: Extended user's guide.
- Joreskog, 1996, LISREL 8: Users' reference guide.
- Lohmoller, 1981, LVPLS 1.6 program manual: Latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation.
- Mooijaart, 1993, Structural equation models with transformed variables., 249
- Muthen, 1998, Mplus user's guide.
- Neale, 1997, Mx: Statistical modeling
- Satorra, 1994, Corrections to standard errors in covariance structure analysis., 399
- Steiger, 1995, SEPATH: STATISTICA version 5.
- West, 1995, Structural equation models with non-normal variables., 56
- Wiley, 1973, The identification problem for structural equation models with unmeasured variables., 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,024
Reporting and Interpreting Research in PSPB: Practices, Principles, and Pragmatics
Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., Ackerman, R. A., & Russell, D. W. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208331253 · Cited by 100
On market mavens and consumer self‐confidence: A cross‐cultural study
Chelminski, P., & Coulter, R. A. (2006) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20153 · Cited by 93
Measuring Serious Leisure in Chess: Model Confirmation and Method Bias
Gould, J. M., Moore, D. D., Karlin, N. J., Gaede, D. B., Walker, J. T., & Dotterweich, A. R. (2011) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490400.2011.583165 · Cited by 96
“The Satorra-Bentler scaled maximum likelihood was applied to reconfigure the reliance on multivariate normality (Fouladi, 2000; McDonald & Ho, 2002). aStandardized root mean square (SRMR), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (Steiger, 1990): Values ≤.05 indicate excellent…”
MethodShih, S. (2008) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/528974 · Cited by 103
“Although the value of RMSEA was greater than .05, a number of researchers have suggested that values in the range of .05 to .08 indicate reasonable fit (Browne & Cudeck, 1993; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
The BELLA study group, Erhart, M., Döpfner, M., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2008) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-008-1012-1 · Cited by 91
Questionnaire on Perception of Threat from COVID-19
Fuentes, M. D. C. P., Jurado, M. D. M. M., Ruíz, N. F. O., Martínez, Á. M., Márquez, M. D. M. S., Herrera‐Peco, I., & Linares, J. J. G. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9041196 · Cited by 94
Wang, N., Jome, L. M., Haase, R. F., & Bruch, M. A. (2006) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/1069072706286474 · Cited by 92
“Following the analytic strategy of McDonald and Ho (2002), the measurement model and structural model provided identical fits in this analysis, hence only the structural model is presented in Figure 2.”
MethodHuijts, I., Kleijn, W. C., van Emmerik, A., Noordhof, A., & Smith, A. J. M. (2012) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.21665 · Cited by 93
Owen, A. E., Thompson, M. P., & Kaslow, N. J. (2006) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.505 · Cited by 97
Tasci, A. D. A. (2017) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2017.09.020 · Cited by 95
Cheung, C. S.-S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037458 · Cited by 108
“These constructs were allowed to correlate with one another; errors of the same indicators over time were also allowed to correlate when suggested by modification indexes from the CFAs conducted on the sample with no missing data (Keith, 2006; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodForest owners' stand improvement decisions: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior
Karppinen, H., & Berghäll, S. (2014) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.009 · Cited by 91
Pietsch, M., & Tulowitzki, P. (2017) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2017.1363787 · Cited by 93
Ebbert, A. M., Infurna, F. J., & Luthar, S. S. (2018) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579418001219 · Cited by 103
“…for missing data, we reran all of our analyses with Mplus (version 7.11; Muthén & Muthén, 2013), utilizing full information maximum likelihood estimation, to make use of all available data in the data set for unbiased parameter estimation (Graham, Cumsille, & Elek-Fisk, 2003; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodInfluentialShopping with augmented reality: How wow-effect changes the equations!
Arghashi, V. (2022) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101166 · Cited by 107
Emotion dysregulation as a maintenance factor of borderline personality disorder features
Stepp, S. D., Scott, L. N., Morse, J. Q., Nolf, K. A., Hallquist, M. N., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2013) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.11.006 · Cited by 92
Lewis, M. A., Rees, M., Logan, D. E., Kaysen, D. L., & Kilmer, J. R. (2010) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/a0018361 · Cited by 91
“Maximum likelihood estimation was used for all analyses, which is robust to minor deviations from normality (Chou, Bentler, & Satorra, 1991; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodAlonso, M. Á. V., Martínez, B. A., Gómez, L. E., & Schalock, R. L. (2010) · Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) · Cited by 91
Sandberg, J., Busby, D., Johnson, S. M., & Yoshida, K. (2012) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01422.x · Cited by 100
“We followed the recommendations of McDonald and Ho (2002) and Kline (2005) to report both absolute fit indexes and incremental fit indexes.”
MethodBlažević, V., Wiertz, C., Cotte, J., de Ruyter, K., & Keeling, D. I. (2013) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.003 · Cited by 99
Review of Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Martynova, E., West, S. G., & Liu, Y. (2017) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1401932 · Cited by 92
“Second, although the coverage of Pearl’s DAG approach represents a unique contribution relative to other current SEM texts, the current presentation has potential liabilities. The complexity of Pearl’s (2009) DAG approach only allows rudimentary coverage of a few of the ideas so that the gain to readers from exposure…”
BackgroundCultural Adaptation of the Brief COPE for Persons Living with HIV/AIDS in Southern India
Mohanraj, R., Jeyaseelan, V., Kumar, S., Mani, T., Rao, D., Murray, K., & Manhart, L. E. (2014) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-014-0872-2 · Cited by 101
Strategien zur Motivationsregulation und ihre Erfassung
Schwinger, M., von der Laden, T., & Spinath, B. (2007) · Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1026/0049-8637.39.2.57 · Cited by 107
Yu, Y., Yang, X., Wang, S., Wang, H., Chang, R., Tsamlag, L., Zhang, S., Xu, C., Yu, X., Cai, Y., et al. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02870-z · Cited by 94
Trust in social media brands and perceived media values: A survey study in China
Zhang, M., Xu, P., & Ye, Y. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107024 · Cited by 115
Fillion, L., Tremblay, I., Truchon, M., Côté, D., Struthers, C. W., & Dupuis, R. (2007) · International Journal of Stress Management · doi:10.1037/1072-5245.14.1.1 · Cited by 98
Reinke, W. M., Eddy, J. M., Dishion, T. J., & Reid, J. B. (2012) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-012-9630-y · Cited by 91
A Prospective Mediational Model of Sexual Aggression Among College Men
Thompson, M. P., Koss, M. P., Kingree, J. B., Goree, J., & Rice, J. (2010) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260510388285 · Cited by 88
“…less than 3 indicative of good fit (Carmines & McIver, 1981); the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) with values greater than .95 indicative of good fit (Hu & Bentler, 1999); and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) with values less than .06 indicative of better fit (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundThe development of personality across the lifespan
Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511596544.015 · Cited by 89
Scale Development and Validation: Methodology and Recommendations
Lamm, K. W., Lamm, A. J., & Edgar, D. W. (2020) · Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education · doi:10.4148/2831-5960.1115 · Cited by 116
Race Differences in Parental Influences on Child Achievement: Multiple Pathways to Success
Davis-Kean, P. E., & Sexton, H. R. (2009) · Merrill-palmer Quarterly · doi:10.1353/mpq.0.0023 · Cited by 89
“In general, χ2 ratios between 1 and 3, CFIs greater than .90, and RMSEAs less than .05 indicate good model fit (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundFowers, B. J., Mollica, C. O., & Procacci, E. N. (2010) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439761003630045 · Cited by 110
“According to McDonald and Ho ( 2002 ), ‘ML estimation and its associated statistics seem fairly robust against violations of nonnormality’ (p.”
BackgroundTesting a model of change in the experiential treatment of depression.
Pos, A. E., Greenberg, L. S., & Warwar, S. H. (2009) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017059 · Cited by 105
“The standard structural equation modeling goodness of fit indices (Kline, 2005; McDonald & Ho, 2002) used were (a) model chi-square p value, (b) root-mean-square error of approximation, (c) comparative fit index, and (d) standardized root-mean-square residual.”
MethodAre there subtypes of alexithymia?
Bagby, R. M., Quilty, L. C., Taylor, G. J., Grabe, H. J., Luminet, O., Veríssimo, R., Grootte, I. D., & Vanheule, S. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.012 · Cited by 89
Tzeng, J. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.010 · Cited by 89
Moretz, M. W., & McKay, D. (2009) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.01.015 · Cited by 84
Ababneh, K. I. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1255904 · Cited by 92
Taylor, S. A. (2007) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466607x174194 · Cited by 90
Factors Precipitating Suicidality among Homeless Youth
Kidd, S. A. (2006) · Youth & Society · doi:10.1177/0044118x05282763 · Cited by 89
“…was the significant direct relationship between total drug use and hopelessness, which was incorporated into the revised model, given similar previous empirical findings and theoretical soundness of these relationships, as is recommended when considering model modification (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodEvaluating a Model of Youth Physical Activity
Heitzler, C. D. (2010) · American Journal of Health Behavior · doi:10.5993/ajhb.34.5.9 · Cited by 84
Trinh, H. N., Tran, H. H., & Quan, V. D. H. (2020) · Asian Journal of Economics and Banking · doi:10.1108/ajeb-06-2020-0018 · Cited by 87
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of a short form of the family health scale
Wang, F., Wu, Y., Sun, X., Wang, D., Ming, W., Sun, X., & Wu, Y. (2022) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-022-01702-1 · Cited by 87
“85 indicated an acceptable fit) [21], normed fit index (NFI) (values > 0.”
Tseng, W., Inscoe, A. B., Kawabata, Y., Crick, N. R., & Gau, S. S. (2013) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21480 · Cited by 95
“…chi‐squares, CFIs and/or TLI greater than .95, RMSEA less than .05 suggest a good model fit with the observed data (Hu & Bentler, 1999; McDonald & Ho, 2002); however, some argues that CFIs or TLI >.90, RMSEA <.10 may also be considered adequate fit (Kline, 1998; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodConsequences of Work-Related Emotions
Hsieh, C., Jin, M. H., & Guy, M. E. (2011) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074010396078 · Cited by 87
“SEM is a convenient tool not only for testing construct validity but also for representing complex causal relations in multivariate data, such as when one variable’s effect is mediated by another (Burnette & Williams, 2005; Kline, 2005; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodBynum, M. S., Lambert, S. F., English, D., & Ialongo, N. S. (2014) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579414000571 · Cited by 97
“RMSEA values greater than 0.05 but less than 0.08 suggest “acceptable” fit (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialHelman, D., Osem, Y., Yakir, D., & Lensky, I. M. (2016) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.08.018 · Cited by 89
Temperament and brain networks of attention
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0254 · Cited by 95
Transcultural Adaptation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) for Brazil and Portugal
Sinval, J., Queirós, C. M. L., Pasian, S. R., & Marôco, J. P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00338 · Cited by 119
Hystad, S. W., & Johnsen, B. H. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01300 · Cited by 86
Bifactor Models of Personality and College Student Performance: A Broad versus Narrow View
McAbee, S. T., Oswald, F. L., & Connelly, B. S. (2014) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1975 · Cited by 86
“Otherwise, global indices of model fit (e.g. RMSEA and CFI) can indicate good fit even if the path estimates are not well supported by the data (McDonald & Ho, 2002; O’Boyle & Williams, 2011).”
ResultAssessing the adequacy of structural equation models: Golden rules and editorial policies
Goffin, R. D. (2006) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.019 · Cited by 87
Olatunji, B. O., Williams, N. L., Lohr, J. M., & Sawchuk, C. N. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.08.002 · Cited by 86
Environmental Influences on Well-Being: A Dyadic Latent Panel Analysis of Spousal Similarity
Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2009) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9516-8 · Cited by 89
Ásgeirsdóttir, B. B., Sigfúsdóttir, I. D., Gudjonsson, G. H., & Sigurðsson, J. F. (2011) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.12.003 · Cited by 118
Avolio, B. J., Wernsing, T. S., & Gardner, W. L. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206317739960 · Cited by 89
“…wide range of informative sources, such as Brown (2015: 129); Green, Tonidandel, and Cortina (2016); Jackson, Gillaspy, and Purc-Stephenson (2009); McDonald and Ho (2002); and Williams, Vandenberg, and Edwards (2009).5 Furthermore, given the ongoing debate on numerous issues in statistical…”
BackgroundExtraversion and Behavioral Activation: Integrating the Components of Approach
Quilty, L. C., DeYoung, C. G., Oakman, J. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2014) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.834440 · Cited by 85
“As the χ2 indicating discrepancy between the predicted and observed covariance matrices is sensitive to sample size and will often be significant even for good models, goodness of fit was evaluated using the Comparative Fit Index (CFI; acceptable fit ≥ .90) and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA; good…”
MethodConsumer attitudes towards production diseases in intensive production systems
Clark, B., Panzone, L., Stewart, G. B., Kyriazakis, I., Niemi, J. K., Latvala, T., Tranter, R., Jones, P., & Frewer, L. J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210432 · Cited by 85
Bai, B., Nie, Y., & Lee, A. N. (2020) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2020.1746317 · Cited by 96
“Commonly reported fit indices, i.e. CFI, TLI, and RMSEA, were used to evaluate the model data fit (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
MethodZhou, H., Dang, L., Lam, L. W., Zhang, M. X., & Wu, A. M. S. (2021) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106978 · Cited by 92
Sensitivity of SEM Fit Indexes With Respect to Violations of Uncorrelated Errors
Heene, M., Hilbert, S., Freudenthaler, H. H., & Bühner, M. (2012) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.634710 · Cited by 93
Power, Sex, and Rape Myth Acceptance: Testing Two Models of Rape Proclivity
Chapleau, K. M., & Oswald, D. L. (2009) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224490902954323 · Cited by 84
“We adopted the guidelines that an RMSEA less than .05 indicates a good fit, and less than .08 indicates an acceptable fit (McDonald & Ho, 2002), and global fit indexes should be larger than .90 (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodDentists' Perceptions of Barriers to Providing Dental Care to Pregnant Women
Lee, R. S. Y., Milgrom, P., Huebner, C. E., & Conrad, D. A. (2010) · Women s Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2010.05.007 · Cited by 85
“According to this approach, the theoretical model is accepted if the test fails to reject the null hypothesis (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundKaiser, F. G., Schultz, P. W., & Scheuthle, H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00225.x · Cited by 87
“Because of the statistical identifiability of the factor loadings, each of the four TPB components requires at least two indicators (cf. McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialDirect and Indirect Links Between Organizational Work-Home Culture and Employee Well-being
Beauregard, T. A. (2010) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00723.x · Cited by 86
“Goodness of fit was interpreted using the comparative fit index (CFI), normed fit index (NFI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and commonly accepted cutoff values (CFI < .90, NFI < .90, and RMSEA > .08) were used as indicative of poor fit (e.g., McDonald and Ho, 2002).”
Factors Affecting Consumer Attitudes and Intentions toward User-Generated Product Content on Youtube
Mir, I. A., & Rehman, K. U. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 83
Benefits of a Regional Evidence‐Based Practice Fellowship Program: A Test of the ARCC Model
Kim, S. C., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A., Stichler, J. F., & Davidson, J. E. (2017) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12199 · Cited by 84
Cooke, D. K., Brant, K. K., & Woods, J. M. (2018) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2018.1517265 · Cited by 109
“Measurement model fit was evaluated based on investigating incremental and absolute fit indexes against standard accepted values (Hu & Bentler, 1999; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodPlace-attachment, destination image and impacts of tourism in mountain destinations
Silva, C., Kastenholz, E., & Abrantes, J. L. (2013) · Anatolia · doi:10.1080/13032917.2012.762312 · Cited by 88
“These absolute fit indices determine how well the a priori model fits, or reproduces the data (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundSocial Competence and Antisocial Behavior: Continuity and Distinctiveness Across Early Adolescence
Sørlie, M., Hagen, K. A., & Ogden, T. (2008) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00553.x · Cited by 83
Social Outcomes Associated With Media Viewing Habits of Low-Income Preschool Children
Conners‐Burrow, N. A., McKelvey, L. M., & Fussell, J. J. (2011) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2011.550844 · Cited by 84
“Imputing missing values produces less bias in the results than deleting cases or using the sample mean for imputation (Acock, 1997; Little & Rubin, 2002; McDonald & Ho, 2002; Rovine & Delaney, 1990).”
BackgroundTeo, T. P. (2009) · ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) · Cited by 84
Internal and External Dimensions of Computer Self-Efficacy: An Empirical Examination
Thatcher, J. B., Zimmer, J. C., Gundlach, M. J., & McKnight, D. H. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2008.927825 · Cited by 84
“The robust fit indexes for the CFI and RMSEA show better fit for the three-factor model (Fig. 2). A CFI greater than 0.90 and an RMSEA below 0.08 is desirable [53]‐[ 55 ].”
MethodInfluentialUsing syndemic theory to understand food insecurity and diet-related chronic diseases
Himmelgreen, D., Romero-Daza, N., Heuer, J., Lucas, W., Salinas-Miranda, A. A., & Stoddard, T. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113124 · Cited by 83
Jordan, E. J., Boley, B. B., Knollenberg, W., & Kline, C. S. (2017) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287517721370 · Cited by 83
Zhang, M. X., Wang, X., Yu, S. M., & Wu, A. M. S. (2019) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106070 · Cited by 83
Depression in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal analysis.
Beal, C. C., Stuifbergen, A., & Brown, A. (2007) · Archives of Psychiatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2007.02.008 · Cited by 87
Evidence for similarities between adolescents and parents in sleep patterns
Brand, S., Gerber, M., Hatzinger, M., Beck, J., & Holsboer‐Trachsler, E. (2009) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2008.12.013 · Cited by 83
Talley, A. E., Molix, L. A., Schlegel, R. J., & Bettencourt, A. (2008) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870440802582682 · Cited by 84
“According to goodness of fit indices outlined in Hu and Bentler ( 1998 ) and McDonald and Ho ( 2002 ), the final model provided an good fit to the data, χ 2 (98) = 113.”
MethodLin, C.-Y., Broström, A., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278719827997 · Cited by 80
“…of the eHEALS using the following fit indices to indicate acceptable data model fit: a nonsignificant w2 test, a comparative fit index (CFI), a Tucker– Lewis index (TLI) 0.9, a root mean square error of approximation, and a standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) 0.08 (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodInfluentialOlino, T. M., Yu, L., Klein, D. N., Rohde, P., Seeley, J. R., Pilkonis, P. A., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (2012) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.1348 · Cited by 81
“RMSEA values between 0.05 and 0.10 represent an acceptable fit (Steiger, 1990), whereas values less than 0.05 indicate a good fit (McDonald and Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialGodbout, N., Daspe, M., Runtz, M., Cyr, G., & Briere, J. (2018) · Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy · doi:10.1037/tra0000403 · Cited by 86
Klein, A., & Sharma, V. M. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102808 · Cited by 98
Zhao, P., & Gao, Y. (2022) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2022.04.002 · Cited by 86
Structural Models and the Art of Approximation
McDonald, R. P. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610388766 · Cited by 90
Self-citationFrom person-environment misfit to job burnout: theoretical extensions
Tong, J. S., Wang, L., & Peng, K. (2015) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-12-2012-0404 · Cited by 82
“The fit indices indicated that the model fit the data (McDonald and Ho, 2002).”
MethodCoffey, J. K., Warren, M. T., & Gottfried, A. W. (2014) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9556-x · Cited by 94
“Although no consensus has been reached in standards for determining goodness of model fit (cf. McDonald and Ho 2002), these indices collectively suggest that the measurement model was an adequate fit to the observed covariance matrix (Byrne 2012).”
BackgroundRelational bonding strategies, customer satisfaction, and loyalty in the container shipping market
Balcı, G., Çalışkan, A., & Yuen, K. F. (2019) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2019-0051 · Cited by 100
Reisenzein, R., & Weber, H. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511596544.007 · Cited by 84
The impact of relationship quality on attitude toward a sponsor
Kim, Y., Ko, Y. J., & James, J. (2011) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/08858621111179840 · Cited by 81
Çalık, M., & Coll, R. K. (2012) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.685197 · Cited by 81
Perception of risk: an organizational model of occupational risk, burnout, and physical symptoms
Leiter, M. P. (2005) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615800500082473 · Cited by 81
“The measurement model was identified with three items loading distinctly on each of the six latent variables with no cross loadings (MacDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodFOSTERING PUBLIC SERVICE MOTIVATION THROUGH WORKPLACE TRUST: EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC MANAGERS IN TAIWAN
Chen, C., Hsieh, C., & Chen, D. (2013) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12042 · Cited by 92
Waasdorp, T. E., Bradshaw, C. P., & Duong, J. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022748 · Cited by 81
Krannitz, M. A., Grandey, A. A., Liu, S., & Almeida, D. A. (2015) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038763 · Cited by 81
“…negative affectivity, job demands, surface acting, job exhaustion, job anxiety, and partner-reported WFC and desire for turnover, fit the data well [ χ 2 ( N = 197, df = 209) = 378.31, CFI = .92, TLI = .90, RMSEA = .06] based on accepted values for model fit indices (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
InfluentialSTRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING METHODS IN STRATEGY RESEARCH: APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES
Williams, L. J., Gavin, M. B., & Hartman, N. S. (2005) · Research methodology in strategy and management · doi:10.1016/s1479-8387(04)01111-7 · Cited by 86
Boyd, M. J., Zaff, J. F., Phelps, E., Weiner, M. B., & Lerner, R. M. (2011) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.07.004 · Cited by 86
Fang, W., Lien, C.-Y., Huang, Y.-W., Han, G., Shyu, G., Chou, J., & Ng, E. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10061886 · Cited by 80
Investigating Key Antecedents and Outcomes of Employee‐based Brand Equity
Boukis, A., & Christodoulides, G. (2018) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12327 · Cited by 95
“The relatively large sample size may have rendered this test an inadequate measure of the model’s fitness because sample size can affect the chi-square value (McDonald and Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundExamining the relationship between place attachment and behavioral loyalty in an urban park setting
Plunkett, D., Fulthorp, K., & Paris, C. M. (2019) · Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism · doi:10.1016/j.jort.2018.11.006 · Cited by 73
Wang, W., Hsu, W., Chiu, Y.-C., & Liang, C. (2011) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.11.004 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Ho, Moon-Ho Ringo
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-82
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2134368355
- Cited by
- 4,734
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 176 · 2025: 300 · 2024: 313 · 2023: 336 · 2022: 348 · 2021: 323 · 2020: 327 · 2019: 289 · 2018: 236 · 2017: 236 · 2016: 206 · 2015: 202 · 2014: 198 · 2013: 208 · 2012: 185
- FWCI
- 58.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- structural equation modeling, reporting guidelines, model justification, model identifiability, non-normality, missing data, goodness-of-fit indices, standard errors, correlation matrix, model mismatch, critical appraisal
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Psychological, Research Design, Linear Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review