The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
Abstract
Principles for reporting analyses using structural equation modeling are reviewed, with the goal of supplying readers with complete and accurate information. It is recommended that every report give a detailed justification of the model used, along with plausible alternatives and an account of identifiability. Nonnormality and missing data problems should also be addressed. A complete set of parameters and their standard errors is desirable, and it will often be convenient to supply the correlation matrix and discrepancies, as well as goodness-of-fit indices, so that readers can exercise independent critical judgment. A survey of fairly representative studies compares recent practice with the principles of reporting recommended here.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The final valid questionnaires of this study were 219 cases, which satisfied the minimum requirement of the sample size of 200 people for structural equation modelling (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
From The Relationship Between Knowledge, Psychological Flexibility, Anxiety and Healthy Behaviour in Stroke Patients: A Chain Mediation Model. (2026) · cites this paper as McDonald and Ho 2002
In the citing paper
“Good model fit is indicated by χ ²/df below three, CFI and NNFI values greater than .90, and RMSEA and SRMR below .08 (Hu and Bentler 1999; McDonald and Ho 2002).”
From Awareness Versus Un-Clinging: Which Matters in Mindfulness? (2017) · cites this paper as McDonald and Ho 2002
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,944
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,475
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Arbuckle, 1997, Amos user's guide.
- Bentler, 1985, Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program.
- Bentler, 1995, EQS structural equations programs manual.
- Hartmann, 1992, The CALIS procedure: Extended user's guide.
- Joreskog, 1996, LISREL 8: Users' reference guide.
- Lohmoller, 1981, LVPLS 1.6 program manual: Latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation.
- Mooijaart, 1993, Structural equation models with transformed variables., 249
- Muthen, 1998, Mplus user's guide.
- Neale, 1997, Mx: Statistical modeling
- Satorra, 1994, Corrections to standard errors in covariance structure analysis., 399
- Steiger, 1995, SEPATH: STATISTICA version 5.
- West, 1995, Structural equation models with non-normal variables., 56
- Wiley, 1973, The identification problem for structural equation models with unmeasured variables., 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,024
Lin, J., Thompson, M. P., & Kaslow, N. J. (2009) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.20307 · Cited by 54
Fathers’ and mothers’ home learning environments and children’s early academic outcomes
Foster, T. D., Froyen, L. C., Skibbe, L. E., Bowles, R. P., & Decker, K. B. (2016) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9655-7 · Cited by 54
Traditional vs. innovative uses of computers among mathematics pre-service teachers in Serbia
Teo, T. P., Milutinović, V., Zhou, M., & Banković, D. (2016) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1189943 · Cited by 56
“This indicates that all of the items were reliable indicators of the hypothesised constructs they were purported to measure in accordance with the level of technology use (Hair et al., 2010; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodResultCasey, B., Lombardi, C., Pollock, A., Fineman, B., & Pezaris, E. (2017) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2017.1363044 · Cited by 53
“…between girls’ arithmetic strategies in first grade and arithmetic fluency and analytical math skills in fifth grade; best practice recommendations were followed for evaluatingmeasurement, path, and structural models (e.g., Anderson&Gerbing, 1988;MacCallum& Austin, 2000; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
Beardslee, J., Docherty, M., Mulvey, E. P., Schubert, C. A., & Pardini, D. A. (2017) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000270 · Cited by 54
“Conventional cutoffs for the CFI and TLI include values greater than .90 for acceptable fit and values greater than .95 for good fit (Hu & Bentler, 1999; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodHow does line-manager support enhance worker wellbeing? A study in China
Huo, M., Boxall, P., & Cheung, G. W. (2018) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1423103 · Cited by 62
“…indices and their minimum accepted standards to evaluate model fit: the Standardised Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR ≤ .08; Hu & Bentler, 1999), the Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA ≤ .08; McDonald & Ho, 2002), and the Comparative Fit Index (CFI ≥ .90; Wang & Wang, 2012).”
MethodIndividualism and internet addiction: the mediating role of psychological needs
Arpacı, İ., Kesici, Ş., & Балоглу, М. (2018) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-11-2016-0353 · Cited by 55
Theodosiou, M., Katsikea, E. S., Samiee, S., & Makri, K. (2019) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2019.03.004 · Cited by 55
“…statistic we used three common fit indices (comparative fit index: CFI, the non-normed fit index: NNFI, and the root mean square error of approximation: RMSEA) (Hu and Bentler 1999; McDonald and Ho 2002) which are also least sensitive to sample size variations (Fan, Thompson, and Wang 1999).”
MethodThe relationship between TQM practices and organisational innovation outcomes
Abu-Salim, T., Sundarakani, B., & Lasrado, F. (2019) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-11-2018-0160 · Cited by 54
Hogue, A., Bobek, M., Dauber, S., Henderson, C. E., McLeod, B. D., & Southam-Gerow, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2018.1555762 · Cited by 53
“RMSEA values of .06 and below, and CFI above .95, indicate strong model fit; CFI ≥ .90 and RMSEA ≤ .08 indicate adequate fit (Browne & Cudeck, 1993; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodGüss, D. (2010) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022110383320 · Cited by 53
Wang, A. Y. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11033-4 · Cited by 76
Luo, C., Hasan, N. A. M., Ahmad, A. M., & Lei, G. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-94994-z · Cited by 127
“These metrics confirm a strong alignment between the observed data and the hypothesized model, thereby validating the model’s reliability and construct validity 63 .”
Ababneh, K. I., Hackett, R. D., & Schat, A. C. H. (2013) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9304-y · Cited by 61
The Development of Sensory Over-responsivity From Infancy to Elementary School
Ben‐Sasson, A., Carter, A. S., & Briggs‐Gowan, M. J. (2010) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9435-9 · Cited by 54
“Models are considered a good fit if CFIs and NFIs are greater than 0.90 and RMSEAs are less than 0.05 ( McDonald and Ho 2002 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Effects of the Going Places Program on Early Adolescent Substance Use and Antisocial Behavior
Simons‐Morton, B. G., Haynie, D. L., Saylor, K. E., Crump, A. D., & Chen, R. (2005) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-005-0005-2 · Cited by 55
“A model with an RMSEA less than 0.05 is regarded as a “good” fit and an RMSEA less than 0.08 is “acceptable” (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodInfluentialErgonomics Climate Assessment: A measure of operational performance and employee well-being
Hoffmeister, K., Gibbons, A. M., Schwatka, N. V., & Rosecrance, J. C. (2015) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.03.011 · Cited by 53
Brand, S., Gerber, M., Kalak, N., Kirov, R., Lemola, S., Clough, P., Pühse, U., & Holsboer‐Trachsler, E. (2013) · Behavioral Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1080/15402002.2013.825839 · Cited by 59
Yang, H., & Chang, E. C. (2014) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2014.886256 · Cited by 61
Hampton, N. Z. (2004) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/1069072704270298 · Cited by 53
“Following the suggestions of McDonald and Ho (2002), four measures of fit were used to evaluate how well the data fit the aforementioned model: (a) the chi-square/degrees of freedom (df) ratio, (b) the goodness-of-fit index (GFI), (c) the comparative-fit-index (CFI), and (d) the root mean square…”
BackgroundMethodObradović, J., & Hipwell, A. E. (2010) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579410000325 · Cited by 56
Effect of Technology-Embedded Scientific Inquiry on Senior Science Student Teachers’ Self-Efficacy
Çalık, M. (2013) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.931a · Cited by 54
John, S. A., Walsh, J. L., & Weinhardt, L. S. (2016) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-016-1446-2 · Cited by 59
Stol, K.-J., Çağlayan, B., & Fitzgerald, B. F. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2017.2774297 · Cited by 53
“Following reporting guidelines for SEM [119], [152], we list the constructs of our model, correlations, means, and standard deviations in Table 11 (as the data were not normally distributed, we used the non-parametric Spearman’s r correlation coefficient).”
MethodZajicek-Farber, M. L. (2010) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-009-9293-7 · Cited by 51
“The analytical process of determining the importance of the causal paths took place through several important steps ( McDonald and Ho 2002 ).”
BackgroundSawatzky, R., Ratner, P. A., Johnson, J. L., Kopec, J. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-17 · Cited by 52
“In addition, the pattern and magnitudes of the residual correlations were examined to locate any specific areas of misfit [63,64].”
BackgroundHaaland, G. H., Olsen, E., & Mikkelsen, A. (2020) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.13153 · Cited by 55
The effects of coaching in employees and organizational performance: The Spanish Case
Utrilla, P. N.-C., Torraleja, F. Á. G., & Lorenzo, D. (2015) · Intangible Capital · doi:10.3926/ic.586 · Cited by 52
Advertising effects of songs' nostalgia and lyrics' relevance
Chou, H., & Lien, N. (2010) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/13555851011062278 · Cited by 53
Hu, B. Y. (2013) · Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education · doi:10.1080/03057925.2013.841468 · Cited by 52
“The researcher used the following highly recommended model fit measures: ratio of chi-square value to the degree of freedom (CMIN/DF), goodness-of-fitness index (GFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and root mean residual (RMR) (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
MethodPredicting tourism loyalty using an integrated Bayesian network mechanism
Hsu, C.-I., Shih, M.-L., Huang, B.-W., Lin, B.-Y., & Lin, C. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.010 · Cited by 52
Olino, T. M., Yu, L., McMakin, D. L., Forbes, E. E., Seeley, J. R., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2013) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9756-6 · Cited by 56
“RMSEA values between 0.05 and 0.10 represent an acceptable fit (Steiger 1990), whereas values less than 0.05 indicate a good fit (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
InfluentialSpiritual leadership: a validation study in a Korean context
Jeon, K. S., Passmore, D. L., Lee, C., & Hunsaker, W. D. (2013) · Journal of Management Spirituality & Religion · doi:10.1080/14766086.2013.801026 · Cited by 52
“The primary advantage of CFA is its utility in assessing the construct validity of a proposed measurement model (Passmore et al. 1987, Hoyle 1995, McDonald and Ho 2002).”
BackgroundMethodGod blesses those who wear Prada
Arli, D. I., Cherrier, H., & Tjiptono, F. (2016) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/mip-12-2014-0232 · Cited by 52
Qu, Y., Pomerantz, E. M., Wang, M., Cheung, C. S.-S., & Cimpian, A. (2016) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-016-0492-4 · Cited by 59
“Each was represented as a latent variable with the six items of the scale serving as indicators, which were allowed to correlate (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
MethodEffect Sizes of Model Misfit in Structural Equation Models
Maydeu‐Olivares, A., & Shi, D. (2017) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000129 · Cited by 52
Romero-Ibarguengoitia, M. E., Vadillo‐Ortega, F., Caballero, A. E., Ibarra‐González, I., Herrera-Rosas, A., Serratos-Canales, M. F., León-Hernández, M., González-Chávez, A., Mummidi, S., Duggirala, R., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193138 · Cited by 59
Development of the Sport Mental Health Continuum—Short Form (Sport MHC-SF)
Foster, B., & Chow, G. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jcsp.2017-0057 · Cited by 53
Precarious sleep? Nonstandard work, gender, and sleep disturbance in 31 European countries
Mai, Q. D., Jacobs, A. W., & Schieman, S. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112424 · Cited by 50
Wu, C., Chen, W.-W., & Jen, C.-H. (2020) · Journal of Adult Development · doi:10.1007/s10804-020-09357-x · Cited by 52
Xu, X., Xiao, B., & Li, C. Z. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124955 · Cited by 52
Rouzaneh, D., Yazdanpanah, M., & Jahromi, A. B. (2020) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106655 · Cited by 52
Adolescent health behavior, contentment in school, and academic achievement.
Kristjnsson, L. (2009) · American Journal of Health Behavior · doi:10.5993/ajhb.33.1.7 · Cited by 52
Personality in cross-cultural perspective
Dragūns, J. G. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511596544.035 · Cited by 51
The positive and negative rumination scale: Development and preliminary validation
Yang, H., Wang, Z., Song, J., Lu, J., Huang, X., Zou, Z., & Pan, L. (2018) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-018-9950-3 · Cited by 63
Zhang, H., & Roberts, L. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.02.007 · Cited by 51
Chang, H., Shelleby, E. C., Cheong, J., & Shaw, D. S. (2012) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00648.x · Cited by 68
“Additionally, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) values below .05 and the comparative fit index (CFI) value above .90 indicate good model fit (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodAssessing Brand Associations for Intercollegiate Ice Hockey
Ross, S., Bang, H., & Lee, S. (2007) · Sport Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106169340701600205 · Cited by 53
“The CFI is based upon a chi-square distribution of the data, and is a measure of perfect fit to the data (MacDonald & Ho, 2002).”
Development and validation of the brief‐satisfaction with appearance scale for systemic sclerosis
Jewett, L. R., Hudson, M., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Heinberg, L. J., Wigley, F. M., Baron, M. G., & Thombs, B. D. (2010) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.20307 · Cited by 52
The development and validation of the Male Assessment of Self-Objectification (MASO).
Daniel, S. M., Bridges, S. K., & Martens, M. P. (2013) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/a0031518 · Cited by 51
Martinovska-Stojcheska, A., Kotevska, A., Bogdanov, N., & Nikolić, A. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.019 · Cited by 51
Understanding urban delivery drivers’ intention to adopt electric trucks in China
Zhou, M., Kong, N., Zhao, L., Huang, F., Wang, S., & Campy, K. S. (2019) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.024 · Cited by 53
Trigueros, R., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Cangas, A. J., Fernández‐Batanero, J. M., Mañas, M. A., Arias, V. B., & López‐Liria, R. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221461 · Cited by 66
Zhaı, X., & Shi, L. (2020) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09852-6 · Cited by 51
“Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was first conducted to verify the measurement models that are usually proposed according to theory or assumption (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodInfluentialRostad, W. L., Moreland, A. D., Valle, L. A., & Chaffin, M. J. (2017) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-017-0963-6 · Cited by 58
“Model fit was assessed with RMSEA, CFI, and TLI, which are commonly reported in the literature (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
Lagged covariance structure models for studying functional connectivity in the brain
Rykhlevskaia, E. I., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.019 · Cited by 54
Impacts of organizational capabilities in information security
Hall, J. H., Sarkani, S., & Mazzuchi, T. A. (2011) · Information Management & Computer Security · doi:10.1108/09685221111153546 · Cited by 50
“Finally, the six-measurement models were evaluated on multiple model fit criteria used in SEM to determine the fit between the hypothesized model and the observed data (McDonald and Ho, 2002).”
MethodSawatzky, R. G., Ratner, P. A., Johnson, J. L., Kopec, J. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9423-4 · Cited by 53
“Ultimately, the assessment of model fit should be based on a comparison of the observed and implied correlation matrices (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
BackgroundWong, Y. J., Tsai, P.-C., Liu, T., Zhu, Q.-Q., & Wei, M.-F. (2014) · Journal of counseling and psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000038 · Cited by 46
Ok, Ü. (2016) · Journal of Beliefs and Values · doi:10.1080/13617672.2016.1141529 · Cited by 50
“If it is 5 or less the model is seen as ‘acceptable’ (see McDonald and Ho 2002).”
BackgroundSandhåland, H., Oltedal, H. A., Hystad, S. W., & Eid, J. (2016) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.12.004 · Cited by 53
Hystad, S. W., Nielsen, M. B., & Eid, J. (2017) · European Review of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.erap.2017.08.003 · Cited by 50
The influence of store environment on brand attitude, brand experience and purchase intention
de Villiers, M. V., Chinomona, R., & Chuchu, T. (2018) · South African Journal of Business Management · doi:10.4102/sajbm.v49i1.186 · Cited by 50
“CMIN, NFI, RFI, IFI, TLI and CFI all meet the recommended threshold of 9 (McDonald & Ho 2002).”
BackgroundJiang, H., Chen, X., Li, J., Tan, Z., Cheng, W., & Yang, Y. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-019-6593-8 · Cited by 50
Impact of auditory sense on trust and brand affect through auditory social interaction and control
Poushneh, A. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102281 · Cited by 56
“The AVE ranged from 0.57 to 0.76, thus meeting the recommended threshold value of 0.5 for convergent validity (McDonald and Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialMartens, M. P., Cox, R. H., Beck, N. C., & Heppner, P. P. (2003) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.235 · Cited by 50
Temperamental Differences in Children's Reactions to Peer Victimization
Sugimura, N., & Rudolph, K. D. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2012.656555 · Cited by 53
“Error terms of the same indicators were allowed to correlate across waves (Keith, 2006 ; McDonald & Ho, 2002 ).”
BackgroundIndividual differences in creative cognition.
Dygert, S. K. C., & Jarosz, A. F. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000713 · Cited by 47
Male-Type and Prototypal Depression Trajectories for Men Experiencing Mental Health Problems
Rice, S., Kealy, D., Seidler, Z. E., Oliffe, J. L., Levant, R. F., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17197322 · Cited by 49
Brière, M., Roy, J. L., & Meïer, O. (2020) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12716 · Cited by 55
Núñez‐Barriopedro, E., Valiño, P. C., Rodríguez, P. G., & Ravina-Ripoll, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653034 · Cited by 56
Li, Y., Siddik, A. B., Masukujjaman, M., & Wei, X. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11219878 · Cited by 55
Hope and resilience as protective factors linked to lower burnout among child welfare workers
Pharris, A. B., Muñoz, R. T., & Hellman, C. M. (2022) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106424 · Cited by 49
Bollestad, V., Amland, J.-S., & Olsen, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016368 · Cited by 49
Li, L., Wang, Q., & Li, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1046407 · Cited by 58
“The CFA analysis revealed that the measurement model’s χ 2 / df value of 2.539 was below the recommended value of 3.0 (Kline, 2010), which showed a good fit with the data, RMSEA value of 0.056 was smaller than 0.08 (McDonald and Ho, 2002), and the GFI of 0.926, NFI of 0.926 and CFI of 0.953 also surpassed the critical…”
ResultInfluentialThe Paradoxical Role of Humanness in Aggression Toward Conversational Agents
Brendel, B., Hildebrandt, F., Dennis, A. R., & Riquel, J. (2023) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2023.2229127 · Cited by 50
“08 [90], showing an acceptable fit [113].”
Rooks, G., Sserwanga, A., & Fresé, M. (2014) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12033 · Cited by 49
Outside‐school physical activity participation and motivation in physical education
Shen, B. (2012) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12004 · Cited by 49
Mama, S. K., Diamond, P. M., McCurdy, S., Evans, A. E., McNeill, L. H., & Lee, R. E. (2015) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.01.001 · Cited by 49
“FIML estimates with the chi-square fit statistic, the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI), the comparative fit index (CFI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) were used as indices of goodness of fit (Gefen et al., 2011; McDonald and Ho, 2002; Schreiber et al., 2006).”
MethodHsu, L. (2013) · Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education · doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.10.001 · Cited by 54
Namjoo, S., Shaghaghi, A., Sarbakhsh, P., Allahverdipour, H., & Pakpour, A. H. (2016) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2016.1196337 · Cited by 49
Watkins, M. W., Dombrowski, S. C., & Canivez, G. L. (2017) · International Journal of School & Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/21683603.2017.1342580 · Cited by 49
Bowling, A. B., Tiemeier, H. W., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Barker, E. D., & Jansen, P. W. (2018) · Pediatric Obesity · doi:10.1111/ijpo.12288 · Cited by 49
“Themodels followed established guidelines for error covariance, and model fit was tested using comparative fit index (CFI) and root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) following the use of Full Information Maximum Likelihood method to impute missing values (32).”
MethodThe Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): A Contribution to Italian Validation with Teachers’
Angelini, G., Buonomo, I., Benevene, P., Consiglio, P., Romano, L., & Fiorilli, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13169065 · Cited by 50
Job satisfaction in nursing: validation of a new instrument for the UK
Murrells, T., CLINTON, M., & Robinson, S. (2005) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2934.2005.00531.x · Cited by 49
Vedsted, P., Sokolowski, I., & Heje, H. N. (2008) · Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.1080/02813430802294803 · Cited by 49
“based on categorical data and we present the six indices which have been shown to be useful in assessing model fit [19 22].”
MethodCommitment and Sacrifice in Emerging Adult Romantic Relationships
Monk, J. K., Vennum, A., Ogolsky, B. G., & Fincham, F. D. (2014) · Marriage & Family Review · doi:10.1080/01494929.2014.896304 · Cited by 48
“Values smaller than .08 for RMSEA and .10 for SRMR, as well as values greater than .95 for CFI suggest acceptable model fit (see Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline, 2011; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodFactors Impacting Resilience of Women Entrepreneurs in India in the Face of COVID-19
Matharu, S. K., & Juneja, D. (2021) · Vision The Journal of Business Perspective · doi:10.1177/09722629211043299 · Cited by 48
“The null hypothesis in case of these models is that there is no correlation between the variables (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
Yan, Z., & Pastore, S. (2022) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/07342829221075121 · Cited by 72
“Values of CFI and TLI higher than 0.90, SRMR and RMSEA lower than 0.08 (Fan & Sivo, 2007; Hu & Bentler, 1999; McDonald & Ho, 2002) were considered indicating acceptable fit.”
BackgroundInfluentialCrisis, ethical leadership and moral courage: Ethical climate during COVID-19
Awad, N. H. A., & Ashour, H. M. A. A. (2022) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/09697330221105636 · Cited by 57
Ma, P., Zhang, L., Dong, H., & Yu, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.957856 · Cited by 48
Digital transparency and the usefulness for open government
Matheus, R., Faber, R., Ismagilova, E., & Janssen, M. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102690 · Cited by 91
Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery
Schmidt, S., & Saraceni, A. (2024) · Research in Transportation Economics · doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101404 · Cited by 52
Modeling safe and unsafe driving behaviour
Verschuur, W. L. G., & Hurts, K. (2007) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.001 · Cited by 48
Basáñez, T., Warren, M. T., Crano, W. D., & Unger, J. B. (2013) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-013-0062-y · Cited by 48
“Because there is no consensus in the standards used to determine whether a model has good statistical fit to the data (McDonald and Ho 2002), we utilized several fit indices.”
A Cross-Cultural Comparison by Individualism/Collectivism among Brazil, Russia, India and China
Tu, Y.-T., Lin, S.-Y., & Chang, Y.-Y. (2011) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v4n2p175 · Cited by 48
College environment, student involvement, and intellectual development: evidence in China
Chi, X., Liu, J., & Bai, Y. (2016) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0030-z · Cited by 50
Hernández, S. O., Alzugaray, F. J. Z., Casanova, Ó., Ledo, C. R., & Gil, B. M. (2016) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735616674791 · Cited by 59
“For these second and third steps, being nested models, comparisons were made following the usual procedures in these cases through the Δχ2 (Byrne, 2010; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodThe interplay of personality and attitudes toward own aging across two decades of later life
Kornadt, A. E., Siebert, J., & Wahl, H. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223622 · Cited by 53
“For the evaluation of goodness of fit in our models, we relied on established recommendations [57].”
MethodLiu, M., Zhao, S., & Li, J. (2022) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2022.04.003 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Ho, Moon-Ho Ringo
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-82
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2134368355
- Cited by
- 4,734
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 176 · 2025: 300 · 2024: 313 · 2023: 336 · 2022: 348 · 2021: 323 · 2020: 327 · 2019: 289 · 2018: 236 · 2017: 236 · 2016: 206 · 2015: 202 · 2014: 198 · 2013: 208 · 2012: 185
- FWCI
- 58.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- structural equation modeling, reporting guidelines, model justification, model identifiability, non-normality, missing data, goodness-of-fit indices, standard errors, correlation matrix, model mismatch, critical appraisal
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Psychological, Research Design, Linear Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review