Cited by 4,734Psychometric Methodologies and TestingMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.

McDonald, Roderick P., Ho, Moon-Ho Ringo·2002·Psychological Methods

Abstract

Principles for reporting analyses using structural equation modeling are reviewed, with the goal of supplying readers with complete and accurate information. It is recommended that every report give a detailed justification of the model used, along with plausible alternatives and an account of identifiability. Nonnormality and missing data problems should also be addressed. A complete set of parameters and their standard errors is desirable, and it will often be convenient to supply the correlation matrix and discrepancies, as well as goodness-of-fit indices, so that readers can exercise independent critical judgment. A survey of fairly representative studies compares recent practice with the principles of reporting recommended here.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Arbuckle, 1997, Amos user's guide.
  2. Bentler, 1985, Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program.
  3. Bentler, 1995, EQS structural equations programs manual.
  4. Hartmann, 1992, The CALIS procedure: Extended user's guide.
  5. Joreskog, 1996, LISREL 8: Users' reference guide.
  6. Lohmoller, 1981, LVPLS 1.6 program manual: Latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation.
  7. Mooijaart, 1993, Structural equation models with transformed variables., 249
  8. Muthen, 1998, Mplus user's guide.
  9. Neale, 1997, Mx: Statistical modeling
  10. Satorra, 1994, Corrections to standard errors in covariance structure analysis., 399
  11. Steiger, 1995, SEPATH: STATISTICA version 5.
  12. West, 1995, Structural equation models with non-normal variables., 56
  13. Wiley, 1973, The identification problem for structural equation models with unmeasured variables., 69

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,024

Metadata

Authors
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Psychological Methods
Published
2002
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
64-82
ISSN
  • 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1463
OpenAlex
W2134368355
Cited by
4,734
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 176 · 2025: 300 · 2024: 313 · 2023: 336 · 2022: 348 · 2021: 323 · 2020: 327 · 2019: 289 · 2018: 236 · 2017: 236 · 2016: 206 · 2015: 202 · 2014: 198 · 2013: 208 · 2012: 185
FWCI
58.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
structural equation modeling, reporting guidelines, model justification, model identifiability, non-normality, missing data, goodness-of-fit indices, standard errors, correlation matrix, model mismatch, critical appraisal
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Psychological, Research Design, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review