The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
Abstract
Principles for reporting analyses using structural equation modeling are reviewed, with the goal of supplying readers with complete and accurate information. It is recommended that every report give a detailed justification of the model used, along with plausible alternatives and an account of identifiability. Nonnormality and missing data problems should also be addressed. A complete set of parameters and their standard errors is desirable, and it will often be convenient to supply the correlation matrix and discrepancies, as well as goodness-of-fit indices, so that readers can exercise independent critical judgment. A survey of fairly representative studies compares recent practice with the principles of reporting recommended here.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The final valid questionnaires of this study were 219 cases, which satisfied the minimum requirement of the sample size of 200 people for structural equation modelling (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
From The Relationship Between Knowledge, Psychological Flexibility, Anxiety and Healthy Behaviour in Stroke Patients: A Chain Mediation Model. (2026) · cites this paper as McDonald and Ho 2002
In the citing paper
“Good model fit is indicated by χ ²/df below three, CFI and NNFI values greater than .90, and RMSEA and SRMR below .08 (Hu and Bentler 1999; McDonald and Ho 2002).”
From Awareness Versus Un-Clinging: Which Matters in Mindfulness? (2017) · cites this paper as McDonald and Ho 2002
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,944
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,475
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Arbuckle, 1997, Amos user's guide.
- Bentler, 1985, Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program.
- Bentler, 1995, EQS structural equations programs manual.
- Hartmann, 1992, The CALIS procedure: Extended user's guide.
- Joreskog, 1996, LISREL 8: Users' reference guide.
- Lohmoller, 1981, LVPLS 1.6 program manual: Latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation.
- Mooijaart, 1993, Structural equation models with transformed variables., 249
- Muthen, 1998, Mplus user's guide.
- Neale, 1997, Mx: Statistical modeling
- Satorra, 1994, Corrections to standard errors in covariance structure analysis., 399
- Steiger, 1995, SEPATH: STATISTICA version 5.
- West, 1995, Structural equation models with non-normal variables., 56
- Wiley, 1973, The identification problem for structural equation models with unmeasured variables., 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,024
Gerber, M., Lang, C., Lemola, S., Colledge, F., Kalak, N., Holsboer-Trachsler, E., Pühse, U., & Brand, S. (2016) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0876-8 · Cited by 199
“Parameter estimation was conducted using maximum likelihood (ML), and multiple goodnessof-fit indexes were considered to examine how well the theoretical model fitted the empirical data [45].”
MethodHeeren, A., Douilliez, C., Peschard, V., Debrauwere, L., & Philippot, P. (2011) · European Review of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.erap.2011.02.001 · Cited by 197
Sani, S. H. Z., Fathirezaie, Z., Brand, S., Pühse, U., Holsboer‐Trachsler, E., Gerber, M., & Talepasand, S. (2016) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s116811 · Cited by 202
“in the CFI would indicate a meaningful change in model fit for testing measurement invariance, even when the Δχ(2) is significant.(54,55) Table 4 shows the goodness-of-fit statistics of all three models.”
BackgroundStuart, G. L., Temple, J. R., Follansbee, K. W., Bucossi, M. M., Hellmuth, J. C., & Moore, T. M. (2008) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/0893-164x.22.1.12 · Cited by 195
Reisinger, Y., & Mavondo, F. (2007) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1300/j073v21n04_05 · Cited by 195
Understanding public transport satisfaction in post COVID-19 pandemic
Dong, H., Ma, S., Jia, N., & Tian, J. (2020) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.004 · Cited by 193
Goncharov, A. B., Haase, R., Santiago-Rivera, A. L., Morse, G., Mccaffrey, R., Rej, R., & Carpenter, D. (2008) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2007.10.006 · Cited by 189
Hutchinson, M., Wilkes, L., Jackson, D. W., & Vickers, M. H. (2010) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01035.x · Cited by 202
Utsey, S. O., Bolden, M. A., Lanier, Y., & Williams, O. (2007) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/0095798406295094 · Cited by 190
Hirschi, A., Niles, S. G., & Akos, P. T. (2010) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.12.009 · Cited by 215
“Despite this result, we chose to analyze the data with maximum likelihood estimation, since simulation studies showed that parameter estimates remain valid even when the data are non-normal as long as no excessive skewness and/or kurtosis are in the data (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodWang, E., & Lin, R.-L. (2016) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1143033 · Cited by 207
“The fi t indices established whether the hypothesised model fi t the data well (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
Backgroundvan Dick, R., Lemoine, J. E., Steffens, N. K., Kerschreiter, R., Akfirat, S. A., Avanzi, L., Dumont, K. B., Epitropaki, O., Fransen, K., Giessner, S. R., et al. (2018) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12223 · Cited by 205
Thornton, L. M., Andersen, B. L., & Blakely, W. P. (2010) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018836 · Cited by 203
Over time relationships between early adolescent and peer substance use.
Simons-Morton, B., & Chen, R. (2006) · Addictive Behaviours · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.09.006 · Cited by 201
Empathy, sex and fluid intelligence as predictors of theory of mind
Ibáñez, A. M., Huepe, D., Gempp, R., Gutiérrez, V. V., Rivera-Rei, Á. A., & Toledo, M. I. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.022 · Cited by 196
On the value of aiming high: The causes and consequences of ambition.
Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer‐Mueller, J. D. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028084 · Cited by 193
The Impact of Maternal Characteristics and Contextual Variables on Infant–Mother Attachment
Huth‐Bocks, A. C., Levendosky, A. A., Bogat, G. A., & von Eye, A. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00688.x · Cited by 205
Lee, T. H., & Shen, Y. L. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.11.002 · Cited by 186
Zhang, M. F., Dawson, J., & Kline, R. B. (2020) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12415 · Cited by 222
“…recent seminal work on best SEM practice, including but not limited to Appelbaum et al. (2018), Goodboy and Kline (2017), Hoyle and Isherwood (2013), MacCallum and Austin (2000), McDonald and Ho (2002), Mueller and Hancock (2008), Nunkoo, Ramkissoon and Gursoy (2013) and Shah and Goldstein (2006).”
BackgroundMethodCredé, M., & Harms, P. D. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2008 · Cited by 181
Assessing the Size of Model Misfit in Structural Equation Models
Maydeu‐Olivares, A. (2017) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-016-9552-7 · Cited by 187
Trigueros, R., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Cangas, A. J., Bermejo, R., García, C. F., & López‐Liria, R. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16162810 · Cited by 197
“Prior to testing the hypothesized model using an SEM and analyzing the relationships existing between the variables belonging to the model, the number of latent variables was reduced, whereby each one had at least two indicators [55].”
MethodInnovation in hotel services: Culture and personality
Chen, W.-J. (2010) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.07.006 · Cited by 181
Košir, K., & Tement, S. (2013) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-013-0205-2 · Cited by 179
Obradović, J., Pardini, D. A., Long, J. D., & Loeber, R. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410701441633 · Cited by 177
“95 or greater for good fit (McDonald & Ho, 2002 ; but see Hu & Bentler, 1999 ; Hutchinson & Olmos, 1998 ).”
Organizational justice and organizational commitment among South Korean police officers
Crow, M. S., Lee, C., & joo, J. J. (2012) · Policing An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13639511211230156 · Cited by 187
“Prior studies recommend examining multiple model fit indices for SEM analyses (Gau, 2010; McDonald and Ho, 2002; Schumacker and Lomax, 2004).”
MethodThe construct validity of the Perceived Stress Scale
Nielsen, M. G., Ørnbøl, E., Vestergaard, M., Bech, P., Larsen, F. B., Lasgaard, M., & Christensen, K. S. (2016) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.03.009 · Cited by 209
“The RMSEA fit index showed reasonable fit, and both the CFI and the TFI showed good fit [46,47,55].”
MethodOddy, W. H., Allen, K. L., Trapp, G., Ambrosini, G. L., Black, L. J., Huang, R., Rzehak, P., Runions, K., Pan, F., Beilin, L. J., et al. (2018) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2018.01.002 · Cited by 198
Chan, W. Y., To, C. K. M., & Chu, W. C. (2015) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.07.001 · Cited by 176
Stepp, S. D., Burke, J. D., Hipwell, A. E., & Loeber, R. (2011) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-011-9530-6 · Cited by 187
“RMSEA values between 0.05 and 0.08 represent acceptable fit, while values McDonald and Ho 2002 ).”
MethodInfluentialAn introduction to using structural equation models in rehabilitation psychology.
Weston, R., Gore, P. A., Chan, F. H., & Catalano, D. (2008) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013039 · Cited by 176
COBRA framework to evaluate e-government services: A citizen-centric perspective
Osman, I. H., Anouze, A. L., Zahir Irani, A., Al‐Ayoubi, B., Lee, H., Balcı, A., Medeni, T. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.009 · Cited by 186
The construct of psychophysiological reactivity: Statistical and psychometric issues
Burt, K. B., & Obradović, J. (2012) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2012.10.002 · Cited by 185
Xu, F., Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Li, Q., & Bodenmann, G. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000329 · Cited by 177
Priporas, C., Stylos, N. D., & Kamenidou, I. E. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.019 · Cited by 210
From customer value to repurchase intentions and recommendations
Olaru, D., Purchase, S., & Peterson, N. (2008) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/08858620810913362 · Cited by 181
“The regression weights in Figure 2 indicate the standardised coefficients and the critical values for the direct effects (McDonald and Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundINVESTIGATING THE COMPASS OF SHAME: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPASS OF SHAME SCALE
Elison, J., Lennon, R., & Pulos, S. M. (2006) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2006.34.3.221 · Cited by 171
“The RMSEA was .055 with a 90% confidence interval between 0.052 and 0.059.”
MethodInfluentialRossi, A., Panzeri, A., Pietrabissa, G., Manzoni, G. M., Castelnuovo, G., & Mannarini, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02177 · Cited by 166
Fang, W., Ng, E., Wang, C.-M., & Hsu, M.-L. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101696 · Cited by 193
Wanting, having, and needing: Integrating motive disposition theory and self-determination theory.
Sheldon, K. M., & Schüler, J. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024952 · Cited by 217
Lehman, B. J., Taylor, S. E., Kiefe, C. I., & Seeman, T. E. (2005) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000188443.48405.eb · Cited by 169
“Consistent with the recommendations of McDonald and Ho (44), we used several indicators of model fit to determine the adequacy of the theoretical models.”
MethodEffects of security and privacy concerns on educational use of cloud services
Arpacı, İ., Kılıçer, K., & Bardakçı, S. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.075 · Cited by 194
Hinnant, J. B., & El-Sheikh, M. (2009) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9341-1 · Cited by 167
From child maltreatment to adolescent cannabis abuse and dependence: A developmental cascade model
Rogosch, F. A., Oshri, A., & Cicchetti, D. (2010) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579410000520 · Cited by 167
Trust disposition, trust antecedents, trust, and behavioral intention
Wang, S. W., Ngamsiriudom, W., & Hsieh, C.-H. (2015) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2015.1047827 · Cited by 189
“Notably, we examine whether the data conform to the multi-normality requirement because SEM (structural equation modeling) model testing was based on the validity of this assumption (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodShi, D., Maydeu‐Olivares, A., & DiStefano, C. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1476221 · Cited by 189
“…researchers have suggested that it is only meaningful to interpret the SRMR when there is little variability among the standardized residual covariances and there are no clear outliers (i.e., some standardized residual covariances much larger than the rest: McDonald & Ho, 2002; Raykov, 2000).”
BackgroundA Service Perspective on the Drivers of Complaint Intentions
Voorhees, C. M., & Brady, M. K. (2005) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670505279702 · Cited by 169
“The CFI is one of the most reliable incremental fit indices and is the most reported measure of fit in the literature (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
BackgroundPsychosocial factors and caregivers’ distress: Effects of familism and dysfunctional thoughts
Losada‐Baltar, A., Márquez‐González, M., Knight, B. G., Yanguas, J., Sayegh, P., & Romero‐Moreno, R. (2010) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860903167838 · Cited by 186
“Following the suggestions by McDonald and Ho (2002), an analysis of the correlations between the variables included in the study was performed prior to the analysis of the goodness-of-fit of the tested model, along with the description of means and standard deviations (SDs) for the assessed…”
MethodStandage, M., & Gillison, F. (2007) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.004 · Cited by 164
“Modification indices (MI) were explored and considered from a theoretical perspective as opposed to being data driven (cf. McDonald & Ho, 2002 ).”
BackgroundConsumers' willingness to adopt and use WeChat wallet: An empirical study in South Africa
Matemba, E. D., & Li, G. (2017) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.12.001 · Cited by 171
Chohan, S. R., & Hu, G. (2022) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2020.1841713 · Cited by 163
“The internal consistency was measured using Cronbach ’ s α , with an overall value greater than 0.8 representing good internal consistency between measurement items (McDonald & Ho, 2002; Rosenblad, 2015; Tavakol & Dennick, 2011; Vacha-Haase et al., 2002).”
MethodInfluentialDevelopment and Validation of the Goal Content for Exercise Questionnaire
Sebire, S. J., Standage, M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2008) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.30.4.353 · Cited by 177
“That is, we avoided the temptation to make sample specific modifications as such a decision would have represented a data-driven approach ( McDonald & Ho, 2002 ).”
MethodNyunt, M. S. Z., Shuvo, F. K., Eng, J. Y., Yap, K. B., Scherer, S. C., Hee, L., Chan, S. P., & Ng, T. P. (2015) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0276-3 · Cited by 163
“The root mean square errors of approximation (RMSEA) were generated as the default index of model fit [21, 22].”
MethodLin, H. Y., Tov, W., & Qiu, L. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.045 · Cited by 178
Starr, C. R. (2018) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684318793848 · Cited by 192
“For RMSEA, values .06 indicate a good model fit and values .08 indicate acceptable fit (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodSusceptibility to phishing on social network sites: A personality information processing model
Frauenstein, E. D., & Flowerday, S. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.101862 · Cited by 165
“The measurement model is a conventional confirmatory factor model that represents a set of observable variables as multiple indicators of a smaller set of latent variables ( McDonald and Ho, 2002 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPerformance Appraisal Procedural Justice: The Role of a Manager’s Implicit Person Theory
Heslin, P. A., & Vandewalle, D. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309342895 · Cited by 169
Teo, T. P. (2009) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.40.1.d · Cited by 158
“According to Cohen (1988), standardized path coefficients with values 100 / TEO a References were taken from: Kline, 2005; McDonald & Ho, 2002; Browne & Cudeck, 1993. less than 0.1 are considered small, those with less than 0.3 are medium, values with 0.5 or more are considered large.”
MethodInfluentialMultidimensional and Hierarchical Assessment of School Motivation: Cross‐cultural validation
McInerney, D. M., & Ali, J. (2006) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410500342559 · Cited by 159
“The SatorraBentler scaled maximum likelihood procedure was applied to ameliorate reliance on multivariate normality (Fouladi, 2000; McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodSoomro, B. A., & Shah, N. (2021) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-01-2021-0023 · Cited by 158
Nugroho, P., & Numata, S. (2020) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2020.1755675 · Cited by 207
“…CFA indicated that the model did not fit the data well, possibly because the chi-squared statistic assesses the absolute fit of the model to the data but is susceptible to sample size (Bollen, 1989; McDonald & Ho, 2002) and can be ignored if the sample size is > 200 (Rajalahti & Kvalheim, 2011).”
MethodImproving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data
Savalei, V. (2020) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2020.1717922 · Cited by 167
“Among the most widely used SEM fit indices (McDonald & Ho, 2002) are the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; Steiger, 1990) and 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CONTACT Victoria Savalei v.savalei@ubc.ca Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.”
MethodLee, T. H., & Hsu, F. Y. (2011) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.867 · Cited by 159
Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. (2011) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.004 · Cited by 169
The effects of organizational learning environment factors on e-learning acceptance
Cheng, B. H., Wang, M., Moormann, J., Olaniran, B. A., & Chen, N. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.014 · Cited by 155
“The two-stage strategy recommended by McDonald and Ho (2002) was followed such that the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was carried out first to evaluate the measurement model, and the full model was then tested to generate the path coefficients.”
MethodResultWang, Q., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2009) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01331.x · Cited by 169
Maydeu‐Olivares, A., & Forero, C. G. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.01333-6 · Cited by 153
Simons‐Morton, B. G., Chen, R., Abroms, L. C., & Haynie, D. L. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.6.612 · Cited by 152
The impact of individual differences on e‐learning system satisfaction: A contingency approach
Lu, H., & Chiou, M. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00937.x · Cited by 150
“…(NFI) = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.07 and root mean square residual (RMSR) = 0.1) were within the acceptable range recommended by the previous researchers (Bagozzi & Yi, 1988; McDonald & Ho, 2002), suggesting that the research model provided a good fit to the data.”
MethodInfluentialSetting the stage: Career development and the student engagement process.
Kenny, M. E., Blustein, D. L., Haase, R. F., Jackson, J., & Perry, J. C. (2006) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.2.272 · Cited by 165
Petróczi, A. (2007) · Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1186/1747-597x-2-34 · Cited by 153
Diefenbach, S., & Christoforakos, L. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00007 · Cited by 151
“A principal component analysis (varimax rotation, 58% explained variance) with three components to be extracted revealed a satisfactory solution with the five items assessing one strategy forming one component, and no loadings larger than 0.30 on other components.”
MethodInfluentialLockwood, P., Marshall, T. C., & Sadler, P. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204271598 · Cited by 209
“Model fit is a reflection of the fixed parameters (i.e., those paths that are set to zero) in the proposed model, not the path estimates (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundThe Big Five Personality Factors as Predictors of Changes Across Time in Burnout and Its Facets
Armon, G., Shirom, A., & Melamed, S. (2011) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00731.x · Cited by 150
Environmentally friendly behaviour and green purchase in Austria and Lithuania
Liobikienė, G., Grincevičienė, Š., & Bernatonienė, J. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.084 · Cited by 150
The Effects of the Land Use System on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Acker, V. V., Witlox, F., & van Wee, B. (2007) · Transportation Planning and Technology · doi:10.1080/03081060701461675 · Cited by 149
“In order to do so, a two-step approach has been undertaken (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988 ; Raykov & Marcoulides, 2000 ; McDonald & Ho, 2002 ).”
MethodHailikari, T. K., Nevgi, A., & Komulainen, E. J. (2007) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410701413753 · Cited by 154
“We used structural equation modelling, also known as path analysis with latent variables (McDonald & Ho, 2002 ), using AMOS 6.”
MethodMindfulness predicts sleep-related self-regulation and well-being
Howell, A. J., Digdon, N. L., & Buro, K. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.009 · Cited by 169
Assessing the construct validity and utility of two new influence tactics
YUKL, G. A., Chavez, C. I., & Seifert, C. F. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.335 · Cited by 149
Changes in Ruminative Thinking Mediate the Clinical Benefits of Mindfulness: Preliminary Findings
Heeren, A., & Philippot, P. (2010) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-010-0037-y · Cited by 147
“The present measures addressed emotional reactions and behaviors that can be absent or present with varying frequency, making non-normality likely (MacDonald and Ho 2002).”
BackgroundXu, F., & Fox, D. (2014) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.03.005 · Cited by 148
Glöckner-Rist, A., & Hoijtink, H. (2003) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1004_4 · Cited by 146
Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT Model to Student Teachers
Wong, K., Teo, T. P., & Russo, S. G. (2012) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0001-9 · Cited by 146
“Finally, the TLI value should be greater than .90 (McDonald and Ho 2002).”
BackgroundShirom, A., Nirel, N., & Vinokur, A. D. (2009) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00411.x · Cited by 163
“Following widely accepted recommendations for SEM analysis (McDonald & Ho, 2002), we report three goodness-of-fit indices: the Normed Fit Index (NFI), the Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI, also known as TLI), and the Comparative Fit Index (CFI).”
MethodShame and the motivation to change the self.
Lickel, B. A., Kushlev, K., Savalei, V., Matta, S., & Schmader, T. (2014) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0038235 · Cited by 161
Erhart, M., Ellert, U., Kurth, B., & Ravens‐Sieberer, U. (2009) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-77 · Cited by 145
Trunfio, M., Jung, T. H., & Campana, S. (2022) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103698 · Cited by 169
Vogelgesang, G. R., Leroy, H., & Avolio, B. J. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.01.004 · Cited by 149
Interpersonal Callousness Trajectories Across Adolescence
Pardini, D. A., & Loeber, R. (2008) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854807310157 · Cited by 154
“RMSEA values between .05 and .08 represent an acceptable fit, and values less than .05 indicate a good fit ( McDonald & Ho, 2002 ).”
BackgroundMethodPerkinson‐Gloor, N., Lemola, S., & Grob, A. (2013) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.11.008 · Cited by 141
WAIS-IV and Clinical Validation of the Four- and Five-Factor Interpretative Approaches
Weiss, L. G., Keith, T. Z., Zhu, J., & Chen, H. (2013) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282913478030 · Cited by 154
“An RMSEA less than .05 corresponded to a good fit, and .08 was considered an acceptable fit (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
MethodStein, C. M., Morris, N. J., Hall, N. B., & Nock, N. L. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7274-6_28 · Cited by 167
Employee isolation and telecommuter organizational commitment
Wang, W., Albert, L. J., & Sun, Q. (2020) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-06-2019-0246 · Cited by 152
“62 (Table I), indicating acceptable convergent validity (McDonald and Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe structure of working memory abilities across the adult life span.
Hale, S., Rose, N. S., Myerson, J., Strube, M., Sommers, M. S., Tye‐Murray, N., & Spehar, B. (2011) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0021483 · Cited by 154
“…values for fit indices has long been a subject of debate (e.g., Bentler, 2007; Hu & Bentler, 1999; Jackson, Gillaspy, & Purc-Stephenson, 2009; McDonald & Ho, 2002), but the following are a fair representation: Measures of absolute fit (chi-square), parsimony corrected fit (root mean square…”
Aguilar‐Luzón, M. D. C., García‐Martínez, J. M. A., Calvo‐Salguero, A., & Salinas, J. M. (2012) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00962.x · Cited by 144
“That is, the relationship between attitudes, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control does not appear to be very clear (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundMan, S. S., Chan, A. H. S., & Alabdulkarim, S. A. (2019) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.009 · Cited by 141
Zhang, J., Li, A. M., Fok, T. F., & Wing, Y. K. (2010) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.036 · Cited by 137
Oshri, A., Rogosch, F. A., Burnette, M. L., & Cicchetti, D. (2011) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/a0023151 · Cited by 151
Lee, T. H., Jan, F., & Huang, G. W. (2015) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2015.1024257 · Cited by 140
“However, the large sample size may have affected the x2 value because a large sample size can bias the assessment of a model’s fit (McDonald & Ho, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialConstruct Validation of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey
Anagnostopoulos, F., Niakas, D. A., & Pappa, E. (2005) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-005-3866-8 · Cited by 140
“Since good-fitting models produce consistent results on many different indices, it is recommended that multiple indices are used and reported, along with their cutoff values signifying adequate model fit [13].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Ho, Moon-Ho Ringo
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-82
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2134368355
- Cited by
- 4,734
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 176 · 2025: 300 · 2024: 313 · 2023: 336 · 2022: 348 · 2021: 323 · 2020: 327 · 2019: 289 · 2018: 236 · 2017: 236 · 2016: 206 · 2015: 202 · 2014: 198 · 2013: 208 · 2012: 185
- FWCI
- 58.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- structural equation modeling, reporting guidelines, model justification, model identifiability, non-normality, missing data, goodness-of-fit indices, standard errors, correlation matrix, model mismatch, critical appraisal
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Psychological, Research Design, Linear Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review