Cited by 1,592Social and Intergroup PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPersonality Traits and Psychology

Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information.

Pratto, Felicia, John, Oliver P.·1991·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

One of the functions of automatic stimulus evaluation is to direct attention toward events that may have undesirable consequences for the perceiver's well-being. To test whether attentional resources are automatically directed away from an attended task to undesirable stimuli, Ss named the colors in which desirable and undesirable traits (e.g., honest, sadistic) appeared. Across 3 experiments, color-naming latencies were consistently longer for undesirable traits but did not differ within the desirable and undesirable categories. In Experiment 2, Ss also showed more incidental learning for undesirable traits, as predicted by the automatic vigilance (but not a perceptual defense) hypothesis. In Experiment 3, a diagnosticity (or base-rate) explanation of the vigilance effect was ruled out. The implications for deliberate processing in person perception and stereotyping are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personally relevant circumstances that elicit negative emotions should reliably interrupt people's actions and capture their attention, both psychologically and physiologically.

    “we concur with other theorists that personally relevant circumstances that elicit negative emotions should reliably interrupt people's actions and capture their attention, both psychologically and physiologically (Levenson, 1994;Mandler, 1984;Pratto & John, 1991;Simon, 1967;Tomkins, 1995).”

    From The Undoing Effect of Positive Emotions (2000) · cites this paper as Pratto & John, 1991

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pratto, F., & John, O. P.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1991
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
380-391
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1990364059
Cited by
1,592
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 68
FWCI
44.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5r01mh039077-08)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
attentional capture, color naming, incidental learning, perceptual defense, person perception, stereotyping, trait evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Color Perception, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Reaction Time, Social Desirability, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review