Cited by 64Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Gender moderates the effect of oxytocin on social judgments

Hoge, Elizabeth A., Anderson, Eric, Lawson, Elizabeth A., Bui, Eric, Fischer, Laura E., Khadge, Shradha D., Barrett, Lisa Feldman, Simon, Naomi M.·2014·Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental

Abstract

Objective: The neuropeptide oxytocin is implicated in social processing, and recent research has begun to explore how gender relates to the reported effects. This study examined the effects of oxytocin on social affective perception and learning. Methods: Forty‐seven male and female participants made judgments of faces during two different tasks, after being randomized to either double‐blinded intranasal oxytocin or placebo. In the first task, “unseen” affective stimuli were presented in a continuous flash suppression paradigm, and participants evaluated faces paired with these stimuli on dimensions of competence, trustworthiness, and warmth. In the second task, participants learned affective associations between neutral faces and affective acts through a gossip learning procedure and later made affective ratings of the faces. Results: In both tasks, we found that gender moderated the effect of oxytocin, such that male participants in the oxytocin condition rated faces more negatively, compared with placebo. The opposite pattern of findings emerged for female participants: they rated faces more positively in the oxytocin condition, compared with placebo. Conclusions: These findings contribute to a small but growing body of research demonstrating differential effects of oxytocin in men and women. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hup.2402

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoge, E. A., Anderson, E., Lawson, E. A., Bui, E., Fischer, L. E., Khadge, S. D., Barrett, L. F., & Simon, N. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Hoge, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-15
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
299-304
ISSN
  • 0885-6222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1077
OpenAlex
W1888419634
Cited by
64
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
13.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Highland Street Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD003312)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH093394)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
oxytocin, gender differences, social perception, face perception, emotion perception, social learning, gossip learning, continuous flash suppression, intranasal administration, trustworthiness, warmth, competence ratings, placebo
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Face, Female, Humans, Judgment, Learning, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxytocin, Self Administration, Sex Characteristics, Social Perception, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review