The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exposure to elevated levels of dietary fat attenuates psychostimulant reward and mesolimbic dopamine turnover in the rat
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies indicate that decreased central dopamine is associated with diet-induced obesity in humans and in animal models. In the current study, the authors assessed the hypothesis that diet-induced obesity reduces mesolimbic dopamine function. Specifically, the authors compared dopamine turnover in this region between rats fed a high-fat diet and those consuming a standard low-fat diet. The authors also assessed behavioral consequences of diet-induced obesity by testing the response of these animals in a conditioned place paradigm using amphetamine as a reinforcer and in an operant conditioning paradigm using sucrose reinforcement. Results demonstrate that animals consuming a high-fat diet, independent of the development of obesity, exhibit decreased dopamine turnover in the mesolimbic system, reduced preference for an amphetamine cue, and attenuated operant responding for sucrose. The authors also observed that diet-induced obesity with a high-fat diet attenuated mesolimbic dopamine turnover in the nucleus accumbens. These data are consistent with recent hypotheses that the hormonal signals derived from adipose tissue regulate the activity of central nervous system structures involved in reward and motivation, which may have implications for the treatment of obesity and/or addiction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To this end, rodent research has revealed that prolonged high-fat diet (HFD) elicits metabolic dysfunction and increases anxiety-and depressive-like behaviors [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], heightens stress and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) responses [37,38], and triggers neurobehavioral deficits associated with blunted mesolimbic dopamine function [39][40][41].”
From The menace of obesity to depression and anxiety prevalence (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“findings of attenuated responses to drug rewards in animal models of obesity (33,34).”
From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“In selectively bred lines of obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats, several differences in mesolimbic dopamine signaling have been reported ([41](#B41), [65](#B65)), but most of these studies used adult, already obese animals.”
From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e565682010-001 · Cited by 9,453
Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001
Mokdad, A. H., Ford, E. S., Bowman, B. A., Dietz, W. H., Vinicor, F., Bales, V. S., & Marks, J. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.1.76 · Cited by 5,866
The interaction of TIGIT with PVR and PVRL2 inhibits human NK cell cytotoxicity
Stanietsky, N., Simic, H., Arapovic, J., Toporik, A., Levy, O., Novik, A., Levine, Z., Beiman, M., Dassa, L., Achdout, H., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903474106 · Cited by 3,524
A Potential Decline in Life Expectancy in the United States in the 21st Century
Olshansky, S. J., Passaro, D. J., Hershow, R. C., Layden, J., Carnes, B. A., Brody, J., Hayflick, L., Butler, R. N., Allison, D. B., & Ludwig, D. S. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr043743 · Cited by 2,612
Falk, J. L. (1973) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/0011818 · Cited by 2,288
A Potential Decline in Life Expectancy in the United States in the 21st Century
Olshansky, S. J., Passaro, D. J., Hershow, R. C., Layden, J. E., Carnes, B. A., Brody, J. A., Hayflick, L., Butler, R. N., Allison, D. B., & Ludwig, D. S. (2005) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/01.ogx.0000167407.83915.e7 · Cited by 1,947
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(03)00233-9 · Cited by 1,869
Wang, G.-J., Volkow, N. D., Logan, J., Pappas, N. R., Wong, C. T., Zhu, W., Netusll, N., & Fowler, J. S. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03643-6 · Cited by 1,864
Gaal, L. F. V., Rissanen, A., Scheen, A. J., Ziegler, O., & Rössner, S. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66374-x · Cited by 1,508
Multiple dopamine functions at different time courses
Schultz, W. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135722 · Cited by 1,415
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. ‐., Tomasi, D., & Baler, R. D. (2013) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2012.01031.x · Cited by 800
Reward mechanisms in obesity: new insights and future directions
Kenny, P. J. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.016 · Cited by 748
Castellanos, E. H., Charboneau, E., Dietrich, M. S., Park, S., Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., & Cowan, R. L. (2009) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2009.138 · Cited by 564
Dopamine Signaling in reward-related behaviors
Baik, J. (2013) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2013.00152 · Cited by 568
Val‐Laillet, D., Aarts, E., Weber, B., Ferrari, M., Quaresima, V., Stoeckel, L. E., Alonso‐Alonso, M., Audette, M. A., Malbert, C., & Stice, E. M. (2015) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.016 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, J. F., Tracy, A. L., Schurdak, J. D., Tschöp, M. H., Lipton, J. W., Clegg, D. J., & Benoit, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1257-1263
- ISSN
- 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0084
- PMC
- PMC2597276
- OpenAlex
- W2069303582
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK066223)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- high-fat diet, diet-induced obesity, amphetamine, sucrose reinforcement, conditioned place preference, nucleus accumbens, reward and motivation, adipose tissue hormones, obesity treatment, addiction
- MeSH terms
- Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Operant, Dietary Fats, Dopamine, Limbic System, Locomotion, Male, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Sucrose, Sweetening Agents, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review