Cited by 564Eating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Obese adults have visual attention bias for food cue images: Evidence for altered reward system function

Castellanos, E H, Charboneau, E, Dietrich, M S, Park, S, Bradley, B P, Mogg, K, Cowan, R L·2009·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Background The major aim of this study was to investigate whether the motivational salience of food cues (as reflected by their attention-grabbing properties) differs between obese and normal-weight subjects in a manner consistent with altered reward system function in obesity.Methodology/principal findings A total of 18 obese and 18 normal-weight, otherwise healthy, adult women between the ages of 18 and 35 participated in an eye-tracking paradigm in combination with a visual probe task. Eye movements and reaction time to food and non-food images were recorded during both fasted and fed conditions in a counterbalanced design. Eating behavior and hunger level were assessed by self-report measures. Obese individuals had higher scores than normal-weight individuals on self-report measures of responsiveness to external food cues and vulnerability to disruptions in control of eating behavior. Both obese and normal-weight individuals demonstrated increased gaze duration for food compared to non-food images in the fasted condition. In the fed condition, however, despite reduced hunger in both groups, obese individuals maintained the increased attention to food images, whereas normal-weight individuals had similar gaze duration for food and non-food images. Additionally, obese individuals had preferential orienting toward food images at the onset of each image. Obese and normal-weight individuals did not differ in reaction time measures in the fasted or fed condition.Conclusions/significance Food cue incentive salience is elevated equally in normal-weight and obese individuals during fasting. Obese individuals retain incentive salience for food cues despite feeding and decreased self-report of hunger. Sensitization to food cues in the environment and their dysregulation in obese individuals may play a role in the development and/or maintenance of obesity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ijo.2009.138

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual differences in ABs are not specific to threat cues in anxiety, as they are also found for other motivationally or personally salient information, for example, in illness and pain, and for rewards such as food cues in obesity and drug cues in addiction.

    “Individual differences in ABs are not specific to threat cues in anxiety, as they are also found for other motivationally or personally salient information, for example, in illness and pain (Hou et al., 2014;Todd et al., 2015); as well as for rewards, such as food cues in obesity (Castellanos et al., 2009) and drug cues in addiction (Field & Cox, 2008;Field, Mogg, & Bradley, 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castellanos, E. H., Charboneau, E., Dietrich, M. S., Park, S., Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., & Cowan, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2009-07-21
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
1063-1073
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2075110848
Cited by
564
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 20
FWCI
20.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
obesity, incentive salience, reward systems, hunger, dietary habits, eye movements, visual probe task
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cues, Evoked Potentials, Fasting, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Humans, Hunger, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review