Cited by 138Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Concurrent and lasting effects of emotion regulation on amygdala response in adolescence and young adulthood

Open access
Silvers, Jennifer A., Shu, Jocelyn, Hubbard, Alexa D., Weber, Jochen, Ochsner, Kevin N.·2015·Developmental Science

Abstract

This study used functional MRI (fMRI) to examine a novel aspect of emotion regulation in adolescent development: whether age predicts differences in both the concurrent and lasting effects of emotion regulation on amygdala response. In the first,active regulation, phase of the testing session,fMRI data were collected while 56 healthy individuals (age range: 10.50–22.92 years) reappraised aversive stimuli so as to diminish negative responses to them. After a short delay, the second,re‐presentation, phase involved passively viewing the aversive images from the reappraisal task. During active regulation, older individuals showed greater drops in negative affect and inverse rostrolateral prefrontal‐amygdala connectivity. During re‐presentation, older individuals continued to show lasting reductions in the amygdala response to aversive stimuli they had previously reappraised, an effect mediated by rostrolateral PFC. These data suggest that one source of heightened emotionality in adolescence is a diminished ability to cognitively down‐regulate aversive reactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.12260

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On voluntary emotion regulation tasks, TD youth show greater amygdala downregulation, increased lPFC recruitment, and increased amygdala-lPFC coupling with age.

    “On voluntary emotion regulation (reappraisal) tasks, TD youth show greater amygdala downregulation [28–30], increased lateral (l)PFC recruitment, and increased amygdala-lPFC coupling [26,28] with age.”

    From Trauma, PTSD, and the Developing Brain (2017) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Discussion reports greater amygdala downregulation and stronger inverse amygdala–rostrolateral PFC connectivity with age during active reappraisal. The Results (Imaging results) found no age-related increase in prefrontal recruitment during active regulation; greater rostrolateral PFC recruitment was associated with age only when participants later viewed previously reappraised images. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • TD youth show increased ability to regulate negative emotion with age.

    “TD youth also show increased ability to regulate negative emotion with age.”

    From Trauma, PTSD, and the Developing Brain (2017) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Effects of explicit-controlled regulation may last from minutes to days, depending on the degree of regulatory practice.

    “The effects of explicit-controlled regulation may last from minutes to days, depending on the degree of regulatory practice (Shurick et al., 2012; Denny and Ochsner, 2014; Silvers et al., 2014; Denny et al., 2015).”

    From Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a multi-level framework (2017) · cites this paper as Silvers et al., 2014

  • The ability to regulate emotion improves with age.

    “Developmental studies find that the ability to regulate emotion improves with age.”
  • Amygdala-prefrontal functional connectivity increases with age.

    “Amygdala-prefrontal functional connectivity also increases with age, suggesting that stronger cortical-subcortical relationships underlie age-related increases in successful emotion regulation [27,28].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silvers, J. A., Shu, J., Hubbard, A. D., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. N.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Silvers, Jennifer A.
  • Ochsner, Kevin N.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-28
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
771-784
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2124259380
Cited by
138
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (0691780)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (94056)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, rostrolateral prefrontal cortex, adolescence, early adulthood, age differences, aversive stimuli, negative affect
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Aging, Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Child, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review