Cited by 219Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Amygdala–prefrontal coupling underlies individual differences in emotion regulation

Open access
Lee, Hyejeen, Heller, Aaron S., van Reekum, Carien M., Nelson, Brady, Davidson, Richard J.·2012·NeuroImage

Abstract

Despite growing evidence on the neural bases of emotion regulation, little is known about the mechanisms underlying individual differences in cognitive regulation of negative emotion, and few studies have used objective measures to quantify regulatory success. Using a trait-like psychophysiological measure of emotion regulation, corrugator electromyography, we obtained an objective index of the ability to cognitively reappraise negative emotion in 56 healthy men (Session 1), who returned 1.3 years later to perform the same regulation task using fMRI (Session 2). Results indicated that the corrugator measure of regulatory skill predicted amygdala-prefrontal functional connectivity. Individuals with greater ability to down-regulate negative emotion as indexed by corrugator at Session 1 showed not only greater amygdala attenuation but also greater inverse connectivity between the amygdala and several sectors of the prefrontal cortex while down-regulating negative emotion at Session 2. Our results demonstrate that individual differences in emotion regulation are stable over time and underscore the important role of amygdala-prefrontal coupling for successful regulation of negative emotion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.044

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deficits in voluntary emotion regulation circuit (amygdala-dmPFC) may play an important role in impaired regulation of negative emotion in pediatric PTSD.

    “deficits in this key voluntary emotion regulation circuit [58,60] may play an important role in impaired regulation of negative emotion in pediatric PTSD.”

    From Trauma, PTSD, and the Developing Brain (2017) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Results and Discussion link stronger inverse amygdala–PFC coupling, including dmPFC, with better down-regulation of negative emotion. The study used a male-only sample and does not establish that deficits in this circuit contribute to impaired regulation in pediatric PTSD; that application goes beyond its findings. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, H., Heller, A. S., van Reekum, C. M., Nelson, B., & Davidson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Davidson, Richard J.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
1575-1581
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155444575
Cited by
219
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH43454, P50-MH069315)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
emotion regulation, individual differences, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, cognitive reappraisal, negative emotions, longitudinal stability
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Electromyography, Emotions, Humans, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review