Cited by 157Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsLanguage, Metaphor, and CognitionPsychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

Distance from a distance: psychological distance reduces sensitivity to any further psychological distance

Maglio, Sam J., Trope, Yaacov, Liberman, Nira·2013·Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Abstract

What is the difference between far and further? Investigations into such psychological distancing--removal from an egocentric reference point--have suggested similarities between geographical space, time, probability, and social distance. We draw on these similarities to propose that experiencing any kind of distance will reduce sensitivity to any other distance. Nine studies varied the initial distance of an event and assessed sensitivity to a second distance. Consistently, people were less responsive to a given span of distance when it was distal versus proximal. This effect held using each of the four distances as the initial instantiation of distance; it also held using each dimension to assess sensitivity to distance (i.e., as the second distance dimension). These findings suggest that the dimensions of psychological distance share a common, interchangeable meaning and that the cross-dimension difference between far and further is less than that between near and far.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030258

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals in higher power positions tend to feel more social distance between themselves and others than lower-power individuals.

    “individuals in higher power positions tend to feel more social distance between themselves and others than lower-power individuals (Magee and Smith, 2013; Maglio et al., 2013; Tamir and Mitchell, 2011).”

    From A map for social navigation in the human brain (2015) · cites this paper as Maglio et al., 2013

  • Previous studies have identified unique brain regions involved in processing different kinds of psychological distance.

    “Previous studies have identified unique brain regions involved in processing different kinds of psychological distance (Addis and Schacter, 2008; Brosch and Sander, 2013; Maglio et al., 2013; Mason and Just, 2011; Muscatell et al., 2012; Parkinson et al., 2014; Tamir and Mitchell, 2011; Weiler et al., 2010).”

    From A map for social navigation in the human brain (2015) · cites this paper as Maglio et al., 2013

  • Construal level theory predicts that subjective psychological distance is modified by changes in perceived distance across any number of physical and social dimensions.

    “The construal level theory predicts that subjective psychological distance is modified by changes in perceived distance across any number of physical and social dimensions (Maglio et al., 2013; Tamir and Mitchell, 2011).”

    From A map for social navigation in the human brain (2015) · cites this paper as Maglio et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maglio, S. J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology General
Published
2013
Volume
142
Issue
3
Pages
644-657
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2018558021
Cited by
157
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (BCS-1053128)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Keywords
psychological distance, distance sensitivity, spatial distance, temporal distance, probability distance, social distance
MeSH terms
Adult, Decision Making, Distance Perception, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Psychological Distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review