Cited by 42Visual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Conditioned fear modulates visual selection.

Open access
Mulckhuyse, Manon, Crombez, Geert, Van der Stigchel, Stefan·2013·Emotion

Abstract

Eye movements reflect the dynamic interplay between top-down- and bottom-up-driven processes. For example, when we voluntarily move our eyes across the visual field, salient visual stimuli in the environment may capture our attention, our eyes, or modulate the trajectory of an eye movement. Previous research has shown that the behavioral relevance of a salient stimulus modulates these processes. This study investigated whether a stimulus signaling an aversive event modulates saccadic behavior. Using a differential fear-conditioning procedure, we presented a threatening (conditional stimulus: CS+) and a nonthreatening stimulus distractor (CS-) during an oculomotor selection task. The results show that short-latency saccades deviated more strongly toward the CS+ than toward the CS- distractor, whereas long-latency saccades deviated more strongly away from the CS+ than from the CS- distractor. Moreover, the CS+ distractor captured the eyes more often than the CS- distractor. Together, these results demonstrate that conditioned fear has a direct and immediate influence on visual selection. The findings are interpreted in terms of a neurobiological model of emotional visual processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0031076

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During many, if not all, fear-conditioning experiments, participants were instructed or encouraged to attend the threat-related stimulus either because it was part of the task or because it was part of the pre-experimental conditioning session.

    “Even though these studies demonstrated a strong bias in selecting threat-signaling stimuli, it should be realized that during many, if not all, of these experiments, participants were instructed or encouraged to attend the threat-related stimulus either because it was part of the task (e.g., Koster et al., 2004) or because it was part of the pre-experimental conditioning session (e.g., Mulckhuyse,”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Mulckhuyse, Crombez, & Van der Stigchel, 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Linke R, De Lima AD, Schwegler H, & Pape HC (1998) Direct synaptic connections of axons from the superior colliculus with identified thalamo-amygdaloid projection neurons in the rat: possible substrates of a subcortical visual pathway to the amygdala. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 403, 158-170
  2. Vuilleumier, P. (2005). How brains beware: Neural systems for emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 585-594,
  3. Walker, R., McSorley, E., Haggard, P. (2006). The control of saccade trajectories: direction of curvature depends upon prior knowledge of target location and saccade latency. Perception and Psychophysics 68 (1), 129-138.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulckhuyse, M., Crombez, G., & Van der Stigchel, S.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2013
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
529-536
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2004166786
Cited by
42
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
fear conditioning, saccades, eye movements, visual attention, top-down control, emotional salience
MeSH terms
Adult, Conditioning, Classical, Fear, Humans, Saccades, Visual Perception, Eye Movement Measurements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review