Cited by 792Behavioral Health and InterventionsMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Not all Personal Goals are Personal: Comparing Autonomous and Controlled Reasons for Goals as Predictors of Effort and Attainment

Sheldon, Kennon M., Elliot, Andrew J.·1998·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Even when goals are self-generated, they may not feel truly "personal," that is, autonomous and self-integrated. In three studies (one concurrent and two prospective), we found that the autonomy of personal goals predicted goal attainment. In contrast, the strength of "controlled" motivation did not predict attainment. Studies 2 and 3 validated a mediational model in which autonomy led to attainment because it promoted sustained effort investment. In Study 3, the Goal Attainment Scaling methodology was used to provide a more objective measure of goal attainment, and additional analyses were performed to rule out expectancy, value, and expectancy x value explanations of the autonomy-to-attainment effects. Results are discussed in terms of contemporary models of volition and self-regulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167298245010

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8 · DOI
  2. Bandura, A., 1989, Goal concepts in personality and social psychology
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1061 · DOI
  4. Cantor, N., 1989, Goal concepts in personality and social psychology, 127
  5. Cardillo, J. E., 1994, Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement
  6. 10.1007/978-1-4612-5887-2 · DOI
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M., 1993, The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium
  8. deCharms, R., 1968, Personal causation: The inner affective determinants of behavior
  9. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Deci, E. L., Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol 38. Perspectives on motivation, 237
  11. Elliot, A. J., 1997, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 667
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1058 · DOI
  13. Emmons, R. A., 1989, Goal concepts in personality and social psychology, 87
  14. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00256.x · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.292 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/978-3-642-70967-8_24 · DOI
  17. Gollwitzer, P. M., 1990, Handbook of motivation and cognition, 53
  18. Gollwitzer, P. M., 1996, The psychology of action, 287
  19. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.508 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Harter, S., 1983, Handbook of child psychology, 275
  22. Jöreskog, K. G., 1993, LISREL 8: User's reference guide
  23. Kihlstrom, J. F., 1994, Handbook of social cognition, 153
  24. Kiresuk, T., 1994, Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement
  25. Kuhl, J., 1986, Action control: From cognition to behavior, 101
  26. Kuhl, J., Life span perspectives on motivation and control
  27. Kuhl, J., 1994, Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation, 93
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1103 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/978-1-4684-0634-4_2 · DOI
  30. Locke, E. A., 1990, A theory of goal setting and task performance
  31. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1040 · DOI
  32. 10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Mead, G. H., 1934, Mind, self and society
  34. 10.1007/978-3-642-70967-8_21 · DOI
  35. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.762 · DOI
  36. Pervin, L. A., 1989, Goal concepts in personality and social psychology, 1
  37. Rogers, C. R., 1951, Client-centered therapy
  38. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.293 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.531 · DOI
  41. Sheldon, K. M., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  42. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x · DOI
  43. Vallerand, R. J., 1996, Toward a motivational model of high school dropout
  44. Vroom, V., 1964, Work and motivation
  45. 10.1037/0022-0167.30.4.514 · DOI
  46. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.115 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1998-05
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
546-557
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2100834612
Cited by
792
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 43
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
personal goals, controlled motivation, goal achievement, effort investment, self-regulation, volition, self-integration, goal attainment scaling, expectancy-value theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review