The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the learning and retention of unfamiliar but verbal material can be facilitated by the advance introduction of relevant subsuming concepts (organizers). This hypothesis is based on the assumption that cognitive structure is hierarchically organized in terms of highly inclusive concepts under which are subsumed less inclusive subconcepts and informational data (Ausubel, Robbins, & Blake, 1957). If this organizational principle of progressive differentiation of an internalized sphere of knowledge does in fact prevail, it is reasonable to suppose that new material becomes incorporated into cognitive structure in so far as it is subsumable under relevant existing concepts. It follows, therefore, that the availability in cognitive structure of appropriate and stable subsumers should enhance the incorporability of such material. If it is also true that meaningful forgetting reflects a process of memorial reduction, in which the identity of new learning material is assimilated by the more inclusive meaning of its subsumers (Ausubel et al, 1957), the same availability should also enhance retention by decelerating the rate of obliterative subsumption. In the present study, appropriate and relevant subsuming concepts (organizers) are deliberately introduced prior to the learning of unfamiliar academic material, in order to ascertain whether learning and retention are enhanced thereby in accordance with the theoretical premises advanced above. METHOD
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring
BLOOM, B. S. (1984) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x013006004 · Cited by 2,734
Dual coding theory and education
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01320076 · Cited by 2,108
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307310317 · Cited by 1,259
Alba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.203 · Cited by 1,169
Learning as a generative process 1
Wittrock, M. C. (1974) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461527409529129 · Cited by 834
Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9 · Cited by 832
Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge
Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90146-4 · Cited by 635
Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention
Martin, A. J. (2008) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003 · Cited by 293
Carroll, J. M., & Olson, J. R. (1988) · Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-70536-5.50007-5 · Cited by 274
Mayer, R. E. (1979) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117008 · Cited by 242
Cognitive Load Theory: Historical Development and Relation to Other Theories
Moreno, R., & Park, B. (2010) · Cognitive Load Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511844744.003 · Cited by 204
Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1976) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543046002239 · Cited by 192
Barnes, B. R., & Clawson, E. U. (1975) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543045004637 · Cited by 186
Learning as a Generative Process
WITTROCK, M. C. (2010) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520903433554 · Cited by 160
The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment
Antonenko, P. D., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.014 · Cited by 154
A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Advance Organizers on Learning and Retention
Luiten, J., Ames, W., & Ackerson, G. (1980) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312017002211 · Cited by 151
Generative Learning: Which Strategies for What Age?
Brod, G. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09571-9 · Cited by 145
Improving curriculum alignment and achieving learning goals by making the curriculum visible
Wijngaards-de Meij, L., & Merx, S. (2018) · International Journal for Academic Development · doi:10.1080/1360144x.2018.1462187 · Cited by 147
Ngoh, L. N., & Shepherd, M. D. (1997) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(96)00976-7 · Cited by 117
(2008) · Cited by 109
Chung, J. (1999) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1999.tb01342.x · Cited by 97
Chen, H.-C., & Graves, M. F. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588168 · Cited by 90
The effect of inquiry teaching and advance organizers upon student outcomes in science education
Lott, G. W. (1983) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660200507 · Cited by 86
Ausubel’s meaningful learning re-visited
Bryce, T. G. K., & Blown, E. J. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04440-4 · Cited by 84
Driscoll, D. M., Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., Ventura, M., Hu, X., & Graesser, A. C. (2003) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/q8cm-fh7l-6hju-dt9w · Cited by 73
The effects of three aural advance organizers for video viewing in a foreign language classroom
Chung, J. M., & Huang, S. C. (1998) · System · doi:10.1016/s0346-251x(98)00037-2 · Cited by 64
Chung, J. (2002) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb03157.x · Cited by 61
Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A. (2008) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00277.x · Cited by 54
A Schema-Based Instructional Design Model for Self-Paced Learning Environments
Jung, E., Lim, R., & Kim, D. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12040271 · Cited by 46
The Coherence of Visual Narratives
KRAFT, R. N., CANTOR, P., & GOTTDIENER, C. (1991) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365091018005002 · Cited by 44
Cavalier, J. C., & Klein, J. D. (1998) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299826 · Cited by 42
Bridging the Disciplinary Divide: Co-Creating Research Ideas in eScience Teams
Pennington, D. D. (2011) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-011-9134-2 · Cited by 35
Aladsani (2024) · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00454-5 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Ausubel, D. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1960-10
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 267-272
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W1966569557
- Cited by
- 1,389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.