The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.
Abstract
Male (N = 248) and female (N = 282) subjects were given the Personal Attributes Questionnaire consisting of 55 bipolar attributes drawn from the Sex Role Stereotype Questionnaire by Rosenkrantz, Vogel, Bee, Broverman, and Broverman and were asked to rate themselves and then to compare directly the typical male and female college student. Self-ratings were divided into male-valued (stereotypically masculine attributes judged more desirable for both sexes), female-valued, and sex-specific items. Also administered was the Attitudes Toward Women Scale and a measure of social self-esteem. Correlations of the self-ratings with stereotype scores and the Attitudes Toward Women Scale were low in magnitude, suggesting that sex role expectations do not distort self-concepts. For both men and women, "femininity" on the female-valued self items and "masculinity" on the male-valued items were positively correlated, and both significantly related to self-esteem. The implications of the results for a concept of masculinity and femininity as a duality, characteristic of all individuals, and the use of the self-rating scales for measuring masculinity, femininity, and androgyny were discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Sex differences in ego functioning: Exploratory studies of agency and communion.
Carlson, R. (1971) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031947 · Cited by 222
Cited by
Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 · Cited by 1,806
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066 · Cited by 1,501
Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology.
Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.686 · Cited by 1,067
Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.198 · Cited by 531
(S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots 1
EYSSEL, F., & HEGEL, F. (2012) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.x · Cited by 487
The Role of Culture and Gender in the Relationship between Positive and Negative Affect
Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N., & Yi, Y. (1999) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/026999399379023 · Cited by 481
Why sex and gender matter in implementation research
Tannenbaum, C., Greaves, L., & Graham, I. D. (2016) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0247-7 · Cited by 386
Gender and leadership emergence: A meta-analysis and explanatory model
Badura, K. L., Grijalva, E., Newman, D. A., Yan, T. T., & Jeon, G. (2018) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12266 · Cited by 288
Gender-related variables for health research
Nielsen, M. W., Stefanick, M. L., Peragine, D., Neilands, T. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Pilote, L., Prochaska, J. J., Cullen, M. R., Einstein, G., Klinge, I., et al. (2021) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-021-00366-3 · Cited by 238
Functional flexibility: A new conception of interpersonal flexibility.
Paulhus, D. L., & Martin, C. L. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.88 · Cited by 223
Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhang, L., Xu, S., Liu, X., & Chen, W. (2021) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-018-9639-z · Cited by 167
Wylie, S. A., Corliss, H. L., Boulanger, V., Prokop, L. A., & Austin, S. B. (2010) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9798-y · Cited by 107
Stake, J. E., & Eisele, H. (2010) · Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_2 · Cited by 100
McLean, C. P., & Hope, D. A. (2010) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.006 · Cited by 72
Stoyanova, M., & Hope, D. A. (2012) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.11.006 · Cited by 68
Patzak, A., Kollmayer, M., & Schober, B. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01289 · Cited by 63
The effects of verbal reinforcement of intrinsic motivation for sex-linked tasks
Blanck, P. D., Reis, H. T., & Jackson, L. (1984) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/bf00287554 · Cited by 57
(2007) · PubMed · Cited by 29
Grand, J. A., Ryan, A. M., Schmitt, N., & Hmurovic, J. (2010) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2010.518184 · Cited by 26
Stassart, C., Dardenne, B., & Etienne, A.-M. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.040 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1975
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-39
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1977115530
- Cited by
- 1,628
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 66.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
