Cited by 47Physical Activity and HealthMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Temporal dynamics of physical activity and affect in depressed and nondepressed individuals

Stavrakakis, Nikolaos, Booij, Sanne H., Roest, Annelieke M., de Jonge, Peter, Oldehinkel, Albertine J., Bos, Elisabeth H.·2015·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The association between physical activity and affect found in longitudinal observational studies is generally small to moderate. It is unknown how this association generalizes to individuals. The aim of the present study was to investigate interindividual differences in the bidirectional dynamic relationship between physical activity and affect, in depressed and nondepressed individuals, using time-series analysis. METHOD: A pair-matched sample of 10 depressed and 10 nondepressed participants (mean age = 36.6, SD = 8.9, 30% males) wore accelerometers and completed electronic questionnaires 3 times a day for 30 days. Physical activity was operationalized as the total energy expenditure (EE) per day segment (i.e., 6 hr). The multivariate time series (T = 90) of every individual were analyzed using vector autoregressive modeling (VAR), with the aim to assess direct as well as lagged (i.e., over 1 day) effects of EE on positive and negative affect, and vice versa. RESULTS: Large interindividual differences in the strength, direction and temporal aspects of the relationship between physical activity and positive and negative affect were observed. An exception was the direct (but not the lagged) effect of physical activity on positive affect, which was positive in nearly all individuals. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the association between physical activity and affect varied considerably across individuals. Thus, while at the group level the effect of physical activity on affect may be small, in some individuals the effect may be clinically relevant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0000303

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stavrakakis, N., Booij, S. H., Roest, A. M., de Jonge, P., Oldehinkel, A. J., & Bos, E. H.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2015-12
Volume
34
Issue
Suppl
Pages
1268-1277
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2431712441
Cited by
47
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NWO/ZonMW VICI (91812607)
  • University Medical Center Groningen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
physical activity, affect, depression, positive affect, negative affect, energy expenditure, individual differences, bidirectional relationship, temporal dynamics, accelerometry, daily activity patterns
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review