Cited by 816Physical Activity and HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Physical activity dose-response effects on outcomes of depression and anxiety

DUNN, ANDREA L., TRIVEDI, MADHUKAR H., O???NEAL, HEATHER A.·2001·Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the scientific evidence for a dose-response relation of physical activity with depressive and anxiety disorders. METHODS: Computer database searches of MEDLINE, PsychLit, and Internet and personal retrieval systems to locate population studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and consensus panel judgments were conducted. RESULTS: Observational studies demonstrate that greater amounts of occupational and leisure time physical activity are generally associated with reduced symptoms of depression. Quasi-experimental studies show that light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity exercise can reduce symptoms of depression. However, no RCTs have varied frequency or duration of exercise and controlled for total energy expenditure in studies of depression or anxiety. Quasi-experimental and RCTs demonstrate that both resistance training and aerobic exercise can reduce symptoms of depression. Finally, the relation of exercise dose to changes in cardiorespiratory fitness is equivocal with some studies showing that fitness is associated with reduction of symptoms and others that have demonstrated reduction in symptoms without increases in fitness. CONCLUSION: All evidence for dose-response effects of physical activity and exercise come from B and C levels of evidence. There is little evidence for dose-response effects, though this is largely because of a lack of studies rather than a lack of evidence. A dose-response relation does, however, remain plausible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-200106001-00027

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DUNN, A. L., TRIVEDI, M. H., & O???NEAL, H. A.
Affiliations
Cooper Institute (US)
Venue
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Published
2001-06
Volume
33
Issue
Supplement
Pages
S587-S597
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999190561
Cited by
816
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 42
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
physical activity, exercise dose-response, depression, anxiety, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, exercise intensity, resistance training, aerobic exercise, cardiorespiratory fitness, occupational physical activity, leisure-time physical activity, total energy expenditure
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Energy Metabolism, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Stress, Psychological, Weight Lifting, Exercise, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review