Cited by 54Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Do children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have set shifting deficits?

Open access
Irwin, Lauren N., Kofler, Michael J., Soto, Elia F., Groves, Nicole B.·2019·Neuropsychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Set shifting, or cognitive flexibility, is a core executive function involving the ability to quickly and efficiently shift back and forth between mental sets. Meta-analysis suggests medium-magnitude shifting impairments in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, this conclusion may be premature because the evidence-base relies exclusively on tasks that have been criticized for poor construct validity and may better reflect general neuropsychological functioning rather than shifting specifically. METHOD: A well-characterized sample of 77 children ages 8-13 (M = 10.46, SD = 1.54; 32 girls; 66% Caucasian/non-Hispanic) with ADHD (n = 43) and without ADHD (n = 34) completed the criterion global-local set shifting task and 2 counterbalanced control tasks that were identical in all aspects except the key processes. RESULTS: The experimental manipulation was successful at evoking set shifting demands during the global-local versus both nonshift control tasks (p < .001; ω2 = .12-.14). Mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed that the ADHD group did not demonstrate disproportional decrements in speed shift costs on the shifting versus nonshift control tasks (p = .30; ω2 = .002), suggesting no evidence of impaired set shifting abilities in ADHD. In contrast, the ADHD group made disproportionately more shifting errors than the non-ADHD group (p = .03; ω2 = 0.03) that were more parsimoniously attributable to prerequisite (nonshifting) processes necessary for successful performance on the global-local task. CONCLUSIONS: Children with ADHD's impaired performance on shifting tasks may be attributable to difficulties maintaining competing rule sets and/or inhibiting currently active rule sets prior to shifting. However, when these higher-order processes are executed successfully, there is no significant evidence to suggest a unique set shifting deficit in ADHD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/neu0000546

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early meta-analyses of inhibitory control deficits in ASD found small to medium effect sizes on tasks similar to those used in ADHD (response inhibition d=0.55; interference control d=0.31).

    “Early meta-analyses of inhibitory control deficits among youth with ASD revealed small to medium effect sizes on tasks similar to those used in the study of youth with ADHD (response inhibition: d=0.55; interference control: d=0.31)80.”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Set Shifting in ADHD section reports meta-analytic effect sizes of d=0.46–0.65 for set shifting in pediatric ADHD, not inhibitory control in youth with ASD. Searches for ASD response inhibition, interference control, and the claimed d=0.55 and d=0.31 estimates found no passage addressing those figures. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Benedetto-Nasho E, & Tannock R (1999). Math computation, error patterns and stimulant effects in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Attention Disorders, 3(3), 121– 134.
  2. Davis RN, & Nolen-Hoeksema S (2000). Cognitive inflexibility among ruminators and nonruminators. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(6), 699– 711.
  3. Espy KA (1997). The Shape School: Assessing executive function in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13(4), 495– 499.
  4. Kaufman AS (2014). K-TEA-3: Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement. Pearson.
  5. Lezak M (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.
  6. Navon D (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive psychology, 9(3), 353– 383.
  7. Wechsler D (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth/Fifth Edition. San Antonio: Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irwin, L. N., Kofler, M. J., Soto, E. F., & Groves, N. B.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
2019-05
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
470-481
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W2935350776
Cited by
54
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R34 MH102499-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, set-shifting, cognitive flexibility, executive function, children, inhibitory control, construct validity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Set, Psychology, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review