Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,066

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A small-cell lung cancer genome with complex signatures of tobacco exposure

Open access
Pleasance, Erin D., Stephens, Philip J., O’Meara, Sarah, McBride, David J., Meynert, Alison, Jones, David, Lin, Meng-Lay, Beare, David, Lau, King Wai, Greenman, Chris, Varela, Ignacio, Nik-Zainal, Serena, Davies, Helen R., Ordoñez, Gonzalo R., Mudie, Laura J., Latimer, Calli, Edkins, Sarah, Stebbings, Lucy, Chen, Lina, Jia, Mingming, Leroy, Catherine, Marshall, John, Menzies, Andrew, Butler, Adam, Teague, Jon W., Mangion, Jonathon, Sun, Yongming A., McLaughlin, Stephen F., Peckham, Heather E., Tsung, Eric F., Costa, Gina L., Lee, Clarence C., Minna, John D., Gazdar, Adi, Birney, Ewan, Rhodes, Michael D., McKernan, Kevin J., Stratton, Michael R., Futreal, P. Andrew, Campbell, Peter J.·2010·Nature

Abstract

Cancer is driven by mutation. Worldwide, tobacco smoking is the principal lifestyle exposure that causes cancer, exerting carcinogenicity through >60 chemicals that bind and mutate DNA. Using massively parallel sequencing technology, we sequenced a small-cell lung cancer cell line, NCI-H209, to explore the mutational burden associated with tobacco smoking. A total of 22,910 somatic substitutions were identified, including 134 in coding exons. Multiple mutation signatures testify to the cocktail of carcinogens in tobacco smoke and their proclivities for particular bases and surrounding sequence context. Effects of transcription-coupled repair and a second, more general, expression-linked repair pathway were evident. We identified a tandem duplication that duplicates exons 3–8 of CHD7 in frame, and another two lines carrying PVT1–CHD7 fusion genes, indicating that CHD7 may be recurrently rearranged in this disease. These findings illustrate the potential for next-generation sequencing to provide unprecedented insights into mutational processes, cellular repair pathways and gene networks associated with cancer. The two cancer genome sequences presented in this issue demonstrate how next-generation sequencing technologies can inform us about mutational processes, repair pathways and gene networks associated with cancer development. First, the genome of a cell line derived from a bone marrow metastasis in a patient who had small-cell lung cancer. This cancer is typical of the type induced by smoking, and the sequence contains mutation signatures characteristic of some of the more than 60 carcinogens present in tobacco smoke. The second paper compares the whole genome sequence of a melanoma cell line to a lymphoblastoid cell line from the same individual. This, the first complete mutational analysis of a solid tumour, reveals a dominant mutational signature reflecting DNA damage due to exposure to ultraviolet light. Tobacco smoke contains more than sixty carcinogens that bind and mutate DNA. Here, massively parallel sequencing technology is used to sequence a small-cell lung cancer cell line, exploring the mutational burden associated with tobacco smoking. Multiple mutation signatures from the cocktail of carcinogens in tobacco smoke are found, as well as evidence of transcription-coupled repair and another, more general, expression-linked repair pathway.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08629

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pleasance, E. D., Stephens, P. J., O’Meara, S., McBride, D. J., Meynert, A., Jones, D., Lin, M.-L., Beare, D., Lau, K. W., Greenman, C., Varela, I., Nik-Zainal, S., Davies, H. R., Ordoñez, G. R., Mudie, L. J., Latimer, C., Edkins, S., Stebbings, L., Chen, L., Jia, M., Leroy, C., Marshall, J., Menzies, A., Butler, A., Teague, J. W., Mangion, J., Sun, Y. A., McLaughlin, S. F., Peckham, H. E., Tsung, E. F., Costa, G. L., Lee, C. C., Minna, J. D., Gazdar, A., Birney, E., Rhodes, M. D., McKernan, K. J., Stratton, M. R., Futreal, P. A., & Campbell, P. J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-12-16
Volume
463
Issue
7278
Pages
184-190
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2139216037
Cited by
1,066
References
4
FWCI
39.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.