Cited by 195Williams Syndrome ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersPluripotent Stem Cells Research

A human neurodevelopmental model for Williams syndrome

Open access
Chailangkarn, Thanathom, Trujillo, Cleber A., Freitas, Beatriz C., Hrvoj-Mihic, Branka, Herai, Roberto H., Yu, Diana X., Brown, Timothy T., Marchetto, Maria C. +20 more·2016·Nature

Abstract

Williams syndrome is a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by an uncommon hypersociability and a mosaic of retained and compromised linguistic and cognitive abilities. Nearly all clinically diagnosed individuals with Williams syndrome lack precisely the same set of genes, with breakpoints in chromosome band 7q11.23 (refs 1-5). The contribution of specific genes to the neuroanatomical and functional alterations, leading to behavioural pathologies in humans, remains largely unexplored. Here we investigate neural progenitor cells and cortical neurons derived from Williams syndrome and typically developing induced pluripotent stem cells. Neural progenitor cells in Williams syndrome have an increased doubling time and apoptosis compared with typically developing neural progenitor cells. Using an individual with atypical Williams syndrome, we narrowed this cellular phenotype to a single gene candidate, frizzled 9 (FZD9). At the neuronal stage, layer V/VI cortical neurons derived from Williams syndrome were characterized by longer total dendrites, increased numbers of spines and synapses, aberrant calcium oscillation and altered network connectivity. Morphometric alterations observed in neurons from Williams syndrome were validated after Golgi staining of post-mortem layer V/VI cortical neurons. This model of human induced pluripotent stem cells fills the current knowledge gap in the cellular biology of Williams syndrome and could lead to further insights into the molecular mechanism underlying the disorder and the human social brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature19067

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Williams syndrome is a rare NDD with a deletion of approximately 25 genes on chromosome 7 and characterized by an unusual sociability and cognitive deficits.

    “Williams (WBS or WS) syndrome is a rare NDD with a deletion of approximately 25 genes on chromosome 7 and characterized by an unusual sociability and cognitive deficits [297].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [297]

    The Abstract (page not provided) describes Williams syndrome as a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder with uncommon hypersociability and compromised cognitive abilities, and locates the typical deletion at chromosome band 7q11.23. Our copy does not establish that the syndrome is rare or that the deletion comprises approximately 25 genes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Deletion variants upstream of FZD9 had previously been associated with cell fraction changes related to Williams syndrome.

    “deletion variants upstream of FZD9 had previously been associated with cell fraction changes related to Williams syndrome (40).”
  • Increased dendrite length and synaptogenesis have been reported in neuron models of Williams syndrome and SHANK2, highlighting that different mutations of the same or different genes can have opposing effects on a cellular phenotype.

    “An increase in dendrite length and synaptogenesis has also been reported in neuron models of Williams syndrome (Chailangkarn et al., 2016) and SHANK2 (Zaslavsky et al., 2019), further highlight how different mutations of the same gene or different genes can have opposing effects on a cellular phenotype”

    From Getting to the cores of autism (2019) · cites this paper as Chailangkarn et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Beltrao-Braga PCB Feeder-Free Derivation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells From Human Immature Dental Pulp Stem Cells Cell Transplantation 20 1707 1719 2011 21457612

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chailangkarn, T., Trujillo, C. A., Freitas, B. C., Hrvoj-Mihic, B., Herai, R. H., Yu, D. X., Brown, T. T., Marchetto, M. C., Bardy, C., McHenry, L., Stefanacci, L., Järvinen, A., Searcy, Y. M., DeWitt, M., Wong, W., Lai, P., Ard, M. C., Hanson, K. L., Romero, S., Jacobs, B., Dale, A. M., Dai, L., Korenberg, J. R., Gage, F. H., Bellugi, U., Halgren, E., Semendeferi, K., & Muotri, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
  • Colorado College (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
  • Semendeferi, Katerina
  • Muotri, Alysson R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-08
Volume
536
Issue
7616
Pages
338-343
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2510152931
Cited by
195
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 4
FWCI
14.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2od006495-01)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (P01 NICHD033113)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020002, R01MH095741, R01MH103134, U19MH107367, U19MH106434, R01MH094753, R56MH109587, R01MH100175)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (T32DC007361)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Keywords
Williams syndrome, induced pluripotent stem cells, neural progenitor cells, cortical neurons, FZD9, haploinsufficiency, apoptosis, dendritic morphology, synapses, calcium oscillations, neuronal network connectivity, social brain, neurodevelopmental disorders, 7q11.23 deletion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Calcium, Cell Differentiation, Cerebral Cortex, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7, Dendrites, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Phenotype, Synapses, Reproducibility of Results, Apoptosis, Williams Syndrome, Cell Shape, Frizzled Receptors, Young Adult, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Haploinsufficiency, Neural Stem Cells, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review