Cited by 237Bioenergy crop production and managementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesClimate change impacts on agriculture

Global biomass production potentials exceed expected future demand without the need for cropland expansion

Open access
Mauser, Wolfram, Klepper, Gernot, Zabel, Florian, Delzeit, Ruth, Hank, Tobias, Putzenlechner, Birgitta, Calzadilla, Alvaro·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

Global biomass demand is expected to roughly double between 2005 and 2050. Current studies suggest that agricultural intensification through optimally managed crops on today's cropland alone is insufficient to satisfy future demand. In practice though, improving crop growth management through better technology and knowledge almost inevitably goes along with (1) improving farm management with increased cropping intensity and more annual harvests where feasible and (2) an economically more efficient spatial allocation of crops which maximizes farmers' profit. By explicitly considering these two factors we show that, without expansion of cropland, today's global biomass potentials substantially exceed previous estimates and even 2050s' demands. We attribute 39% increase in estimated global production potentials to increasing cropping intensities and 30% to the spatial reallocation of crops to their profit-maximizing locations. The additional potentials would make cropland expansion redundant. Their geographic distribution points at possible hotspots for future intensification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms9946

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Profit-maximizing reallocation of land to bioenergy crops while maintaining food production, and production-maximizing crop selection considering environmental constraints, could help maximize biomass production while minimizing environmental footprints.

    “Profit-maximizing reallocation land to bioenergy crops, but still maintain food production [86] from existing cropland, and production-maximizing crop selection considering en-vironmental constraints [93] could help maximize biomass production while minimize environmental footprints.”
  • Cropping intensification is believed to be an alternative to provide additional biomass production without significant cropland expansion.

    “For instance, cropping intensification is believed to be an alternative to provide additional biomass production without significant cropland expansion [86].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Nelson G. C.. Climate change effects on agriculture: economic responses to biophysical shocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3274– 3279 (2014). 24344285 PMC3948295
  2. Hank T.. in Proc. 2012 IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. (IGARSS), 1006–1009 (IEEE, 2012).
  3. Duzgun H. S. B. & Usul N. in 22nd Annual ESRI International User Conference (San Diego, California, 2002).
  4. Ramankutty N., Hertel T., Lee H.-L. & Rose S. K. in Human-Induced Climate Change. An Interdisciplinary Assessment ed Schlesinger Michael E.. 252– 265Cambridge University Press (2007).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Zabel, F., Delzeit, R., Hank, T., Putzenlechner, B., & Calzadilla, A.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE)
Corresponding author
Mauser, Wolfram
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-11-12
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
8946-8946
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2257579174
Cited by
236
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7
FWCI
32.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
biomass demand, cropland expansion, agricultural intensification, cropping intensity, farm profit maximization, future food demand
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Forecasting, Ecosystem, Biomass, Crops, Agricultural, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review