Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 631

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single-molecule sequencing and chromatin conformation capture enable de novo reference assembly of the domestic goat genome

Open access
Bickhart, Derek M, Rosen, Benjamin D, Koren, Sergey, Sayre, Brian L, Hastie, Alex R, Chan, Saki, Lee, Joyce, Lam, Ernest T, Liachko, Ivan, Sullivan, Shawn T, Burton, Joshua N, Huson, Heather J, Nystrom, John C, Kelley, Christy M, Hutchison, Jana L, Zhou, Yang, Sun, Jiajie, Crisà, Alessandra, Ponce de León, F Abel, Schwartz, John C, Hammond, John A, Waldbieser, Geoffrey C, Schroeder, Steven G, Liu, George E, Dunham, Maitreya J, Shendure, Jay, Sonstegard, Tad S, Phillippy, Adam M, Van Tassell, Curtis P, Smith, Timothy P L·2017·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Abstract The decrease in sequencing cost and increased sophistication of assembly algorithms for short-read platforms has resulted in a sharp increase in the number of species with genome assemblies. However, these assemblies are highly fragmented, with many gaps, ambiguities, and errors, impeding downstream applications. We demonstrate current state of the art for de novo assembly using the domestic goat ( Capra hircus ), based on long reads for contig formation, short reads for consensus validation, and scaffolding by optical and chromatin interaction mapping. These combined technologies produced the most contiguous de novo mammalian assembly to date, with chromosome-length scaffolds and only 663 gaps. Our assembly represents a >250-fold improvement in contiguity compared to the previously published C. hircus assembly, and better resolves repetitive structures longer than 1 kb, supporting the most complete repeat family and immune gene complex representation ever produced for a ruminant species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.3802

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bickhart, D. M., Rosen, B. D., Koren, S., Sayre, B. L., Hastie, A. R., Chan, S., Lee, J., Lam, E. T., Liachko, I., Sullivan, S. T., Burton, J. N., Huson, H. J., Nystrom, J. C., Kelley, C. M., Hutchison, J. L., Zhou, Y., Sun, J., Crisà, A., Ponce de León, F. A., Schwartz, J. C., Hammond, J. A., Waldbieser, G. C., Schroeder, S. G., Liu, G. E., Dunham, M. J., Shendure, J., Sonstegard, T. S., Phillippy, A. M., Van Tassell, C. P., & Smith, T. P. L.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2017-03-06
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
643-650
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2594081754
Cited by
631
References
14
FWCI
29.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.