Cited by 343Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Cannabinoids Enhance Subsecond Dopamine Release in the Nucleus Accumbens of Awake Rats

Open access
Cheer, Joseph F., Wassum, Kate M., Heien, Michael L. A. V., Phillips, Paul E. M., Wightman, R. Mark·2004·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Dopaminergic neurotransmission has been highly implicated in the reinforcing properties of many substances of abuse, including marijuana. Cannabinoids activate ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons, the main ascending projections of the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system, and change their spiking pattern by increasing the number of impulses in a burst and elevating the frequency of bursts. Although they also increase time-averaged striatal dopamine levels for extended periods of time, little is known about the temporal structure of this change. To elucidate this, fast-scan cyclic voltammetry was used to monitor extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of freely moving rats with subsecond timescale resolution. Intravenous administration of the central cannabinoid (CB 1) receptor agonist,R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl) methanone mesylate, dose-dependently produced catalepsy, decreased locomotion, and reduced the amplitude of electrically evoked dopamine release while markedly increasing the frequency of detected (nonstimulated) dopamine concentration transients. The CB 1 receptor antagonist [N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methylpyrazole-3-carboxamide] reversed and prevented all agonist-induced effects but did not show effects on dopamine release when injected alone. These data demonstrate that doses of a cannabinoid agonist known to increase burst firing produce ongoing fluctuations in extracellular dopamine on a previously unrecognized temporal scale in the nucleus accumbens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0529-04.2004

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fast-scanning cyclic voltammetry studies have shown an increased frequency of spontaneous phasic DA signals in the NAc in response to cannabinoids and nicotine in awake, behaving animals, and temporally distinct DA signals in response to cocaine.

    “In addition, studies using fast-scanning cyclic voltammetry, which can detect the level of DA release in the intact brain on a timescale of seconds, have shown an increased frequency of spontaneous phasic DA signals in the NAc in response to cannabinoids and nicotine in awake, behaving animals [125,126], and also temporally distinct DA signals in response to cocaine [127].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheer, J. F., Wassum, K. M., Heien, M. L. A. V., Phillips, P. E. M., & Wightman, R. M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2004-05-05
Volume
24
Issue
18
Pages
4393-4400
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2164654255
Cited by
343
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 30
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA10900, R01DA010900)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
cannabinoids, dopamine release, nucleus accumbens, CB1 receptor, catalepsy, locomotion, mesocorticolimbic dopamine system, ventral tegmental area, drug reinforcement
MeSH terms
Rimonabant, Animals, Cannabinoids, Dopamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electric Stimulation, Electrochemistry, Electrodes, Implanted, Male, Medial Forebrain Bundle, Morpholines, Motor Activity, Naphthalenes, Synaptic Transmission, Nucleus Accumbens, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, Benzoxazines, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review