Cited by 344CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseVirus-based gene therapy research

CRISPR-STOP: gene silencing through base-editing-induced nonsense mutations

Kuscu, Cem, Parlak, Mahmut, Tufan, Turan, Yang, Jiekun, Szlachta, Karol, Wei, Xiaolong, Mammadov, Rashad, Adli, Mazhar·2017·Nature Methods

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9-induced DNA damage may have deleterious effects at high-copy-number genomic regions. Here, we use CRISPR base editors to knock out genes by changing single nucleotides to create stop codons. We show that the CRISPR-STOP method is an efficient and less deleterious alternative to wild-type Cas9 for gene-knockout studies. Early stop codons can be introduced in ∼17,000 human genes. CRISPR-STOP-mediated targeted screening demonstrates comparable efficiency to WT Cas9, which indicates the suitability of our approach for genome-wide functional screenings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.4327

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Base editing can be repurposed as a gene loss of function tool by creating a stop codon or a gene knockdown by creating an upstream open reading frame (uORF).

    “It can also be repurposed as a gene loss of function tool by creating a stop codon or a gene knockdown by creating an upstream open reading frame (uORF) (Billon et al., 2017;Kuscu et al., 2017;Xiong et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuscu, C., Parlak, M., Tufan, T., Yang, J., Szlachta, K., Wei, X., Mammadov, R., & Adli, M.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Adli, Mazhar
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2017-06-05
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
710-712
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2621848900
Cited by
344
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 9
FWCI
15.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
base editing, nonsense mutation, gene knockout, CRISPR/Cas9, targeted mutagenesis, single-nucleotide editing
MeSH terms
Gene Expression Regulation, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Plasmids, Codon, Terminator, Codon, Nonsense, Gene Targeting, Gene Silencing, HEK293 Cells, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review