Cited by 320Multisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

A normalization model of multisensory integration

Open access
Ohshiro, Tomokazu, Angelaki, Dora E, DeAngelis, Gregory C·2011·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Responses of neurons that integrate multiple sensory inputs are traditionally characterized in terms of a set of empirical principles. However, a simple computational framework that accounts for these empirical features of multisensory integration has not been established. We propose that divisive normalization, acting at the stage of multisensory integration, can account for many of the empirical principles of multisensory integration shown by single neurons, such as the principle of inverse effectiveness and the spatial principle. This model, which uses a simple functional operation (normalization) for which there is considerable experimental support, also accounts for the recent observation that the mathematical rule by which multisensory neurons combine their inputs changes with cue reliability. The normalization model, which makes a strong testable prediction regarding cross-modal suppression, may therefore provide a simple unifying computational account of the important features of multisensory integration by neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2815

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurons in many cortical and subcortical brain areas exhibit robust gain modulation that may contribute to multiple cognitive functions, including attention, learning, sensory processing and multimodal integration.

    “Neurons in many cortical and subcortical brain areas exhibit robust gain modulation that may contribute to multiple cognitive functions, including attention, learning, sensory processing and multimodal integration1–3,7,8,13–17.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [3]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohshiro, T., Angelaki, D. E., & DeAngelis, G. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
DeAngelis, Gregory C
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2011-05-08
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
775-782
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2167940154
Cited by
320
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 21
FWCI
26.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY019087, R01EY016178)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
multisensory integration, divisive normalization, computational model, cue reliability, multisensory neurons
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Neurons, Afferent, Superior Colliculi, Temporal Lobe, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review