Cited by 221Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies

Frequency ratio of Yb and Sr clocks with 5 × 10−17 uncertainty at 150 seconds averaging time

Open access
Nemitz, Nils, Ohkubo, Takuya, Takamoto, Masao, Ushijima, Ichiro, Das, Manoj, Ohmae, Noriaki, Katori, Hidetoshi·2016·Nature Photonics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2016.20

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of a state-of-the-art OLO affords unprecedented optical clock stability.

    “This demonstrates that use of a state-of-the-art OLO affords unprecedented optical clock stability 10-15 .”

    From Ultrastable optical clock with two cold-atom ensembles (2017) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]1. Chou, C. W., Hume, D. B., Koelemeij, J. C. J., Wineland, D. J. & Rosenband, T. Frequency comparison of two high-accuracy Al + optical clocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070802 (2010).
  2. [6]6. Godun, R. M. et al. Frequency ratio of two optical clock transitions in 171 Yb + and constraints on the time variation of fundamental constants. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 210801 (2014).
  3. [22]22. Beloy, K. et al. Atomic clock with 1×10 -18 room-temperature blackbody Stark uncertainty. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 260801 (2014).
  4. [36]36. Falke, S. et al. A strontium lattice clock with 3x10 -17 inaccuracy and its frequency. New J. Phys. 16, 073023 (2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nemitz, N., Ohkubo, T., Takamoto, M., Ushijima, I., Das, M., Ohmae, N., & Katori, H.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
Corresponding author
Katori, Hidetoshi
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2016-02-29
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
258-261
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
OpenAlex
W2287800111
Cited by
221
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 10
FWCI
16.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Time Synchronization Technologies
Keywords
frequency ratio measurement, common-mode rejection, laser noise, redefinition of the second, SI second, measurement instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review