Cited by 85Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques

Comparing a mercury optical lattice clock with microwave and optical frequency standards

Open access
Tyumenev, R, Favier, M, Bilicki, S, Bookjans, E, Targat, R Le, Lodewyck, J, Nicolodi, D, Coq, Y Le +4 more·2016·New Journal of Physics

Abstract

In this paper we report the evaluation of an optical lattice clock based on neutral mercury with a relative uncertainty of . Comparing this characterized frequency standard to a 133 Cs atomic fountain we determine the absolute frequency of the transition of 199 Hg as (systematic), limited solely by the realization of the SI second. Furthermore, by comparing the mercury optical lattice clock to a 87 Rb atomic fountain, we determine for the first time to our knowledge the ratio between the 199 Hg clock transition and the 87 Rb ground state hyperfine transition. Finally we present a direct optical to optical measurement of the 199 Hg/ 87 Sr frequency ratio. The obtained value of 2.629 314 209 898 909 15 with a fractional uncertainty of is in excellent agreement with a similar measurement obtained by Yamanaka et al (2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 230801 ). This makes this frequency ratio one of the few physical quantities agreed upon by different laboratories to this level of uncertainty. Frequency ratio measurements of the kind reported in this paper have a strong impact for frequency metrology and fundamental physics as they can be used to monitor putative variations of fundamental constants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113002

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several optical frequency ratio measurements and independent absolute frequency measurements of optical lattice clocks have been made locally at INRIM, LNE-SYRTE, NPL, and PTB, all of which operate one or more optical clocks and Cs primary frequency standards.

    “Several optical frequency ratio measurements as well as independent absolute frequency measurements of optical lattice clocks have been made locally at the following NMIs”

    From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [106]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tyumenev, R., Favier, M., Bilicki, S., Bookjans, E., Targat, R. L., Lodewyck, J., Nicolodi, D., Coq, Y. L., Abgrall, M., Guéna, J., Sarlo, L. D., & Bize, S.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Sarlo, L De
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2016-11-02
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
113002
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295139653
Cited by
85
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Région Ile de France (DIM Nano K)
  • EMRP (JRP ITOC)
  • European Research Council (AdOC)
  • Centre National d’Études Spatiales
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Keywords
frequency ratio measurement, frequency standard comparison, hyperfine transitions, frequency metrology, variation of fundamental constants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review