Cited by 4,667RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 217 of the 218 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology

Open access

Abstract

mRNA vaccines represent a promising alternative to conventional vaccine approaches because of their high potency, capacity for rapid development and potential for low-cost manufacture and safe administration. However, their application has until recently been restricted by the instability and inefficient in vivo delivery of mRNA. Recent technological advances have now largely overcome these issues, and multiple mRNA vaccine platforms against infectious diseases and several types of cancer have demonstrated encouraging results in both animal models and humans. This Review provides a detailed overview of mRNA vaccines and considers future directions and challenges in advancing this promising vaccine platform to widespread therapeutic use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrd.2017.243

Cites

217 of 217 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 218 references

1 of the 218 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,011

Metadata

Authors
Pardi, N., Hogan, M. J., Porter, F. W., & Weissman, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Weissman, Drew
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2018-01-12
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
261-279
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W2782708334
Cited by
4,667
References
218
Citations by year
2026: 640 · 2025: 683 · 2024: 630 · 2023: 662 · 2022: 801 · 2021: 808 · 2020: 303 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 49
FWCI
30.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1066832, OPP1033102)
  • National Institutes of Health (AI084860, AI-100645)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011‐17‐2‐0069)
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-100645, UM1AI100645, R01-AI084860, R01AI050484, R01AI124429, AI124429, U01AI067854, R01AI090788)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, mRNA stability, mRNA delivery, vaccine platforms, cancer vaccines, infectious disease vaccines, vaccine development
MeSH terms
Vaccinology, Animals, Humans, Neoplasms, RNA, Messenger, Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review