Cited by 153Gut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyOral microbiology and periodontitis research

A clinician's guide to microbiome analysis

Claesson, Marcus J., Clooney, Adam G., O'Toole, Paul W.·2017·Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Abstract

Microbiome analysis involves determining the composition and function of a community of microorganisms in a particular location. For the gastroenterologist, this technology opens up a rapidly evolving set of challenges and opportunities for generating novel insights into the health of patients on the basis of microbiota characterizations from intestinal, hepatic or extraintestinal samples. Alterations in gut microbiota composition correlate with intestinal and extraintestinal disease and, although only a few mechanisms are known, the microbiota are still an attractive target for developing biomarkers for disease detection and management as well as potential therapeutic applications. In this Review, we summarize the major decision points confronting new entrants to the field or for those designing new projects in microbiome research. We provide recommendations based on current technology options and our experience of sequencing platform choices. We also offer perspectives on future applications of microbiome research, which we hope convey the promise of this technology for clinical applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.97

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The large intestine is an important host site for microbial metabolism.

    “The large intestine is thus an important host site for microbial metabolism, a convenient truth that fortunately aligns with our reliance on the analysis of stool samples to gain insights into our microbial inhabitants (Fraher et al., 2012;Claesson et al., 2017).”

    From Gut reactions: Breaking down xenobiotic–microbiome interactions (2019) · cites this paper as Claesson et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Claesson, M. J., Clooney, A. G., & O'Toole, P. W.
Affiliations
University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Claesson, Marcus J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Published
2017-08-09
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
585-595
ISSN
  • 1759-5045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5053
OpenAlex
W2743544008
Cited by
153
References
210
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland
  • APC Microbiome Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
microbiome analysis, gut microbiota, microbiota composition, microbiota function, biomarkers, microbiota-based therapy, intestinal diseases, extraintestinal diseases
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Genetic Techniques, Humans, Research Design, Computational Biology, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review