Cited by 833CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyRNA regulation and disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond editing: repurposing CRISPR-Cas9 for precision genome regulation and interrogation

Open access
Dominguez, Antonia A., Lim, Wendell A., Qi, Lei S.·2016·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Abstract

The bacterial CRISPR-Cas9 system has emerged as a multifunctional platform for sequence-specific regulation of gene expression. This Review describes the development of technologies based on nuclease-deactivated Cas9, termed dCas9, for RNA-guided genomic transcription regulation, both by repression through CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) and by activation through CRISPR activation (CRISPRa). We highlight different uses in diverse organisms, including bacterial and eukaryotic cells, and summarize current applications of harnessing CRISPR-dCas9 for multiplexed, inducible gene regulation, genome-wide screens and cell fate engineering. We also provide a perspective on future developments of the technology and its applications in biomedical research and clinical studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrm.2015.2

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 91 references

1 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 833

Metadata

Authors
Dominguez, A. A., Lim, W. A., & Qi, L. S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • QB3 (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lim, Wendell A.
  • Qi, Lei S.
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2015-12-16
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
5-15
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W2204875887
Cited by
832
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 2
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (DP5OD017887)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA036858)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, dCas9, CRISPR interference, CRISPR activation, gene expression inhibition, gene activation, genome-wide screen
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Models, Genetic, Transcription, Genetic, Genome, RNA Editing, Genomics, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review