CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 124Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An open label, non-randomized study assessing a prebiotic fiber intervention in a small cohort of Parkinson’s disease participants

Open access
Hall, Deborah A., Voigt, Robin M., Cantu-Jungles, Thaisa M., Hamaker, Bruce, Engen, Phillip A., Shaikh, Maliha, Raeisi, Shohreh, Green, Stefan J., Naqib, Ankur, Forsyth, Christopher B., Chen, Tingting, Manfready, Richard, Ouyang, Bichun, Rasmussen, Heather E., Sedghi, Shahriar, Goetz, Christopher G., Keshavarzian, Ali·2023·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-36497-xPMC PMC9938693
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A pro-inflammatory intestinal microbiome is characteristic of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Prebiotic fibers change the microbiome and this study sought to understand the utility of prebiotic fibers for use in PD patients. The first experiments demonstrate that fermentation of PD patient stool with prebiotic fibers increased the production of beneficial metabolites (short chain fatty acids, SCFA) and changed the microbiota demonstrating the capacity of PD microbiota to respond favorably to prebiotics. Subsequently, an open-label, non-randomized study was conducted in newly diagnosed, non-medicated ( n = 10) and treated PD participants ( n = 10) wherein the impact of 10 days of prebiotic intervention was evaluated. Outcomes demonstrate that the prebiotic intervention was well tolerated (primary outcome) and safe (secondary outcome) in PD participants and was associated with beneficial biological changes in the microbiota, SCFA, inflammation, and neurofilament light chain. Exploratory analyses indicate effects on clinically relevant outcomes. This proof-of-concept study offers the scientific rationale for placebo-controlled trials using prebiotic fibers in PD patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04512599.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-36497-x

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Fermentation of prebiotic fibers with human stool increases short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. Stool obtained from PD patients had a lower concentration of total SCFA than stool obtained from healthy controls (HC) (left panel, Student’s t test: P = 0.004, n = 10 biologically independent samples/group). Fermentation of stool with different fibers (Fibers 1–5, 12 h stool fermentation) increased total SCFA production in stool obtained from both HC and PD patients (right panel, Student’s t test: P = 0.387, n = 10 biologically independent samples/fiber/group). Fiber 1: fructooligosaccharides (FOS), Fiber 2: glucan, Fiber 3: pectin, Fiber 4: sorghum arabinoxylan and Fiber 5: a mixture of 25% of each of FOS, glucan, pectin, sorghum arabinoxylan. For each box-and-whisker plot, the central horizontal line indicates the median, the bottom and top of edges of the box indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles (respectively), and the top and bottom whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles (respectively). Each point represents a biologically independent sample. A two-tailed Student’s t test was used for analysis. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.
Fig. 1 Fermentation of prebiotic fibers with human stool increases short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. Stool obtained from PD patients had a lower concentration of total SCFA than stool obtained from healthy controls (HC) (left panel, Student’s t test: P = 0.004, n = 10 biologically independent samples/group). Fermentation of stool with different fibers (Fibers 1–5, 12 h stool fermentation) increased total SCFA production in stool obtained from both HC and PD patients (right panel, Student’s t test: P = 0.387, n = 10 biologically independent samples/fiber/group). Fiber 1: fructooligosaccharides (FOS), Fiber 2: glucan, Fiber 3: pectin, Fiber 4: sorghum arabinoxylan and Fiber 5: a mixture of 25% of each of FOS, glucan, pectin, sorghum arabinoxylan. For each box-and-whisker plot, the central horizontal line indicates the median, the bottom and top of edges of the box indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles (respectively), and the top and bottom whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles (respectively). Each point represents a biologically independent sample. A two-tailed Student’s t test was used for analysis. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Fermentation of human stool with prebiotics alters microbial community structure and increases the production of SCFA. A stool slurry was incubated with fiber (24 h stool fermentation). Three experimental replicates per treatment were conducted, two of which were used for microbiota sequencing (each represented as a separate column). a Microbial community structure was assessed using DNA-based 16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (n = 2 biologically independent samples). Hierarchical clustering of the 25 most abundant genera are visualized (heatmap represents log2 relative abundance). Hierarchical clustering was performed using Euclidean distances and the Ward algorithm, and clusters of taxa were associated with fiber types. Data are presented as Z-scores of relative abundances normalized within each row. b–e Short-chain fatty acid-production (mM) during 24 h stool fermentation including total SCFA, acetate, butyrate, and propionate (n = 3 biologically independent samples in each group). Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used for analysis, with P values adjusted for multiple comparisons: a = significant vs blank, b = significant vs resistant starch, c = significant vs rice bran, d = significant vs resistant maltodextrin (significance P < 0.05, P values for each comparison are reported in Supplementary Table S1). f Proportions of each short-chain fatty acid (as a percent of total SCFA) produced during the 24 h stool fermentation (n = 3 biologically independent samples). Source data are provided as a Source Data File. Res. Starch resistant starch, Res. Maltodextrin resistant maltodextrin.
Fig. 2 Fermentation of human stool with prebiotics alters microbial community structure and increases the production of SCFA. A stool slurry was incubated with fiber (24 h stool fermentation). Three experimental replicates per treatment were conducted, two of which were used for microbiota sequencing (each represented as a separate column). a Microbial community structure was assessed using DNA-based 16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (n = 2 biologically independent samples). Hierarchical clustering of the 25 most abundant genera are visualized (heatmap represents log2 relative abundance). Hierarchical clustering was performed using Euclidean distances and the Ward algorithm, and clusters of taxa were associated with fiber types. Data are presented as Z-scores of relative abundances normalized within each row. b–e Short-chain fatty acid-production (mM) during 24 h stool fermentation including total SCFA, acetate, butyrate, and propionate (n = 3 biologically independent samples in each group). Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used for analysis, with P values adjusted for multiple comparisons: a = significant vs blank, b = significant vs resistant starch, c = significant vs rice bran, d = significant vs resistant maltodextrin (significance P < 0.05, P values for each comparison are reported in Supplementary Table S1). f Proportions of each short-chain fatty acid (as a percent of total SCFA) produced during the 24 h stool fermentation (n = 3 biologically independent samples). Source data are provided as a Source Data File. Res. Starch resistant starch, Res. Maltodextrin resistant maltodextrin.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Characterization of PD participant stool microbiome at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention. a Diversity indices, including Shannon Index, Simpson’s Index, Species Richness, and Pielou’s evenness were calculated at the taxonomic level of species (n = 19 biologically independent samples assessed at baseline and after prebiotic intervention). Mean index score and standard deviation (SD) are displayed. b Visualization of microbial community structure at baseline and after prebiotic intervention was performed using nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) at the taxonomic level of species (n = 19 biologically independent samples assessed at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention). Symbols representing each PD participant (P1–P20) were connected to a centroid representing the mean value of each group: baseline (red) or after prebiotic intervention (blue). A dotted line connects each subject at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention. c Mean relative abundance of microbial species (>1% relative abundance) at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention. Bold taxa indicate a significant difference (q < 0.05) between baseline and after prebiotic intervention assessed using a two-tailed, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. The prebiotic intervention: d, e decreased relative abundance of putative pro-inflammatory bacteria from the phylum Proteobacteria and the species Escherichia coli; f–j increased relative abundance of putative beneficial SCFA-producing bacterial species including Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans, Parabacteroides merdae, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Ruminococcus bicirculans; k–l decreased the relative abundance of Ruminococcus bromii and Ruminococcus torques; and m increased levels of plasma SCFA. A two-tailed, Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for analysis. Bar height represents the group mean and individual samples are indicated. n = 19 (a–l) and n = 18 (m) biologically independent samples assessed at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention. Group means and standard deviations are shown in Supplementary Table 4 and source data are provided as a Source Data File. BL baseline, Prebiotic after the 10-day prebiotic intervention.
Fig. 3 Characterization of PD participant stool microbiome at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention. a Diversity indices, including Shannon Index, Simpson’s Index, Species Richness, and Pielou’s evenness were calculated at the taxonomic level of species (n = 19 biologically independent samples assessed at baseline and after prebiotic intervention). Mean index score and standard deviation (SD) are displayed. b Visualization of microbial community structure at baseline and after prebiotic intervention was performed using nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) at the taxonomic level of species (n = 19 biologically independent samples assessed at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention). Symbols representing each PD participant (P1–P20) were connected to a centroid representing the mean value of each group: baseline (red) or after prebiotic intervention (blue). A dotted line connects each subject at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention. c Mean relative abundance of microbial species (>1% relative abundance) at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention. Bold taxa indicate a significant difference (q < 0.05) between baseline and after prebiotic intervention assessed using a two-tailed, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. The prebiotic intervention: d, e decreased relative abundance of putative pro-inflammatory bacteria from the phylum Proteobacteria and the species Escherichia coli; f–j increased relative abundance of putative beneficial SCFA-producing bacterial species including Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans, Parabacteroides merdae, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Ruminococcus bicirculans; k–l decreased the relative abundance of Ruminococcus bromii and Ruminococcus torques; and m increased levels of plasma SCFA. A two-tailed, Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for analysis. Bar height represents the group mean and individual samples are indicated. n = 19 (a–l) and n = 18 (m) biologically independent samples assessed at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention. Group means and standard deviations are shown in Supplementary Table 4 and source data are provided as a Source Data File. BL baseline, Prebiotic after the 10-day prebiotic intervention.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Ten days of the prebiotic intervention had effects on biological outcomes. Ten days of the prebiotic intervention: a reduced plasma zonulin n = 20, b reduced stool calprotectin n = 20, and c reduced plasma neurofilament (NfL) n = 19. Bar height represents the group mean and individual points are indicated for each group, biological independent samples assessed at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention. A two-tailed, Paired t- test was used for analysis. Group means and standard deviations are shown in Table 3, and source data are provided as a Source Data File.
Fig. 4 Ten days of the prebiotic intervention had effects on biological outcomes. Ten days of the prebiotic intervention: a reduced plasma zonulin n = 20, b reduced stool calprotectin n = 20, and c reduced plasma neurofilament (NfL) n = 19. Bar height represents the group mean and individual points are indicated for each group, biological independent samples assessed at baseline and after the prebiotic intervention. A two-tailed, Paired t- test was used for analysis. Group means and standard deviations are shown in Table 3, and source data are provided as a Source Data File.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 124

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hall, D. A., Voigt, R. M., Cantu-Jungles, T. M., Hamaker, B., Engen, P. A., Shaikh, M., Raeisi, S., Green, S. J., Naqib, A., Forsyth, C. B., Chen, T., Manfready, R., Ouyang, B., Rasmussen, H. E., Sedghi, S., Goetz, C. G., & Keshavarzian, A.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Nanchang University (CN)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Mercer University (US)
Corresponding author
Keshavarzian, Ali
ORCID
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-02-18
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
926-926
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41467-023-36497-x
PMC
PMC9938693
OpenAlex
W4321328855
Cited by
124
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 10
FWCI
21.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Parkinson's Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH-R01, AA026801)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R24AA026801)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG056653)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, prebiotic fiber, gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, intestinal fermentation, neuroinflammation, neurofilament light chain, dietary intervention, gut-brain axis
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Feces, Humans, Parkinson Disease, Prebiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review