Cited by 103Gut microbiota and healthParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Gut microbiota differences between healthy older adults and individuals with Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review

Open access
Nuzum, Nathan D., Loughman, Amy, Szymlek-Gay, Ewa A., Hendy, Ashlee, Teo, Wei-Peng, Macpherson, Helen·2020·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

The 'Dual Hit' hypothesis, stating that Parkinson's disease (PD) begins via olfactory pathways and the gut, and the gastrointestinal symptoms PD individuals face, have largely driven the interest of the gut's involvement in PD. Studies have since observed gut microbiota differences between PD groups and controls, with these alterations potentially relating to PD pathophysiology. However, differences in the studies' methodologies precludes unanimity on the relationships of gut microbiota to PD. Thirteen observational case-control studies investigating gut microbiota in PD and controls were reviewed to assess how microbiota abundance and diversity relates to PD. Nine studies showed butyrate producing gut microbiota had lower abundances in PD compared to controls. Three studies reported α-diversity was higher, with one reporting it was lower, in PD compared to controls. Given most studies show abundance, not diversity, differences of butyrate producing bacteria between groups, we propose abundance differences are more associated with PD than microbiota diversity. As current research is observational, investigating how specific bacteria and their metabolites may alter throughout PD progression is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.003

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diminished SCFA-producing species and SCFA levels are consistently reported in prodromal PD and PD patients compared with healthy controls, and may be correlated with clinical severity of PD.

    “These findings are in concordance with a substantial body of literature that consistently reports diminished SCFAs-producing species and SCFA levels in prodromal stage of PD and PD patients compared to healthy controls, which may be correlated with the clinical severity of PD.52,322–331”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuzum, N. D., Loughman, A., Szymlek-Gay, E. A., Hendy, A., Teo, W.-P., & Macpherson, H.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Nuzum, Nathan D.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
112
Pages
227-241
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005406928
Cited by
103
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, gut microbiota, butyrate-producing bacteria, microbial diversity, olfactory dysfunction, gastrointestinal symptoms, older adults, bacterial metabolites
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Aging, Humans, Parkinson Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review