Cited by 160Liver physiology and pathologyEpigenetics and DNA MethylationTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Epigenetic remodelling licences adult cholangiocytes for organoid formation and liver regeneration

Open access
Aloia, Luigi, McKie, Mikel Alexander, Vernaz, Grégoire, Cordero-Espinoza, Lucía, Aleksieva, Niya, van den Ameele, Jelle, Antonica, Francesco, Font-Cunill, Berta +9 more·2019·Nature Cell Biology

Abstract

Following severe or chronic liver injury, adult ductal cells (cholangiocytes) contribute to regeneration by restoring both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. We recently showed that ductal cells clonally expand as self-renewing liver organoids that retain their differentiation capacity into both hepatocytes and ductal cells. However, the molecular mechanisms by which adult ductal-committed cells acquire cellular plasticity, initiate organoids and regenerate the damaged tissue remain largely unknown. Here, we describe that ductal cells undergo a transient, genome-wide, remodelling of their transcriptome and epigenome during organoid initiation and in vivo following tissue damage. TET1-mediated hydroxymethylation licences differentiated ductal cells to initiate organoids and activate the regenerative programme through the transcriptional regulation of stem-cell genes and regenerative pathways including the YAP-Hippo signalling. Our results argue in favour of the remodelling of genomic methylome/hydroxymethylome landscapes as a general mechanism by which differentiated cells exit a committed state in response to tissue damage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41556-019-0402-6

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through coordination of this and other epigenetics pathways, YAP activity is able to be amplified robustly to ensure a timely adjustment during liver injury and regeneration.

    “Through coordination of this and other epigenetics pathways42, YAP activity is able to be amplified robustly to ensure a timely adjustment during liver injury and regeneration.”

    From HBO1 functions as an epigenetic barrier to hepatocyte plasticity and reprogramming during liver injury (2025) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results section (page not available in our copy) shows that TET1-mediated epigenetic regulation affects YAP/Hippo pathway components during the response to liver damage; the Discussion says this contributes to ductal-cell regeneration. The paper does not establish that coordination among multiple epigenetic pathways robustly amplifies YAP activity or ensures a timely adjustment. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pooling different cells and/or organoids for bulk analysis can lead to inaccurate results.

    “Pooling together different cells and/or organoids for bulk analysis can lead to inaccurate results3,70,100,204,207,208.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [208]

    The Results section on organoid initiation describes RNA-sequencing of ductal cells at several time points, but does not say that pooling different cells or organoids makes bulk analysis inaccurate. A search for pooling, bulk analysis, and heterogeneity found no passage addressing that concern in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aloia, L., McKie, M. A., Vernaz, G., Cordero-Espinoza, L., Aleksieva, N., van den Ameele, J., Antonica, F., Font-Cunill, B., Raven, A., Aiese Cigliano, R., Belenguer, G., Mort, R. L., Brand, A. H., Zernicka-Goetz, M., Forbes, S. J., Miska, E. A., & Huch, M.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Huch, Meritxell
Venue
Nature Cell Biology
Published
2019-11
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1321-1333
ISSN
  • 1465-7392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4679
OpenAlex
W2986073722
Cited by
160
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (104640/Z/14/Z, 104151/Z/14/Z, 092096/Z/10/Z, 105839, 104151, C6946/A14492, 103792/Z/14/Z, 105839/Z/14/Z, 104640, 092096, 103792)
  • Cancer Research UK (A18583, C13474/A18583, C6946 /A14492, 092096, C6946, 18583, A14492)
  • Royal Society (RP150061)
  • National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC/R001162/1)
  • Cambridge Trust
  • National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC/R001162/1)
  • Darwin Trust of Edinburgh
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (MSCA-IF-2016, 668350)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P016839/1, MC_PC_12009, MR/K017047/1, MR/K50127X/1)
  • Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge (C6946/A14492)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
cholangiocytes, liver regeneration, liver organoids, epigenetic remodeling, TET1, DNA hydroxymethylation, cellular plasticity, stemness genes, hepatocyte differentiation, tissue damage
MeSH terms
Epigenome, Hippo Signaling Pathway, YAP-Signaling Proteins, Animals, Bile Ducts, DNA-Binding Proteins, Epithelial Cells, Female, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Organoids, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Signal Transduction, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, DNA Methylation, Gene Expression Profiling, Epigenesis, Genetic, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Transcriptome, Primary Cell Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review