CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted drug delivery strategies for precision medicines

Manzari, Mandana T., Shamay, Yosi, Kiguchi, Hiroto, Rosen, Neal, Scaltriti, Maurizio, Heller, Daniel A.·2021·Nature Reviews Materials
DOI 10.1038/s41578-020-00269-6PMC PMC8691416
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41578-020-00269-6

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 297

  1. Tran, S., DeGiovanni, P. J., Piel, B. & Rai, P. Cancer nanomedicine: a review of recent success in drug delivery. Clin. Transl. Med. 6, 44 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Dugger, S. A., Platt, A. & Goldstein, D. B. Drug development in the era of precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17, 183–196 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bhullar, K. S. et al. Kinase-targeted cancer therapies: progress, challenges and future directions. Mol. Cancer 17, 48 (2018). · DOI
  4. Ferguson, F. M. & Gray, N. S. Kinase inhibitors: the road ahead. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17, 353–377 (2018). Review of kinase inhibitors as a leading modality in personalized medicine. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Smalley, I. & Smalley, K. S. M. ERK inhibition: a new front in the war against MAPK pathway–driven cancers? Cancer Discov. 8, 140–142 (2018). · DOI
  6. Yaeger, R. & Corcoran, R. B. Targeting alterations in the RAF–MEK pathway. Cancer Discov. 9, 329–341 (2019). · DOI
  7. Gabizon, A., Shmeeda, H. & Barenholz, Y. Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 42, 419–436 (2003). · DOI
  8. Song, Q. et al. Reduction responsive self-assembled nanoparticles based on disulfide-linked drug–drug conjugate with high drug loading and antitumor efficacy. Mol. Pharm. 13, 190–201 (2016). · DOI
  9. Shamay, Y. et al. Quantitative self-assembly prediction yields targeted nanomedicines. Nat. Mater. 17, 361–368 (2018). · DOI
  10. Bamrungsap, S. et al. Nanotechnology in therapeutics: a focus on nanoparticles as a drug delivery system. Nanomedicine 7, 1253–1271 (2012). · DOI
  11. Hong, D. et al. Phase I study of LY2606368, a checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 1764–1771 (2016). · DOI
  12. Mak, G. et al. A phase Ib dose-finding, pharmacokinetic study of the focal adhesion kinase inhibitor GSK2256098 and trametinib in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 120, 975–981 (2019). · DOI
  13. Postel-Vinay, S. et al. Clinical benefit in Phase-I trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: does dose matter? Br. J. Cancer 100, 1373–1378 (2009). · DOI
  14. Wong, H. H., Barton, C., Acton, G., McLeod, R. & Halford, S. Trends in the characteristics, dose-limiting toxicities and efficacy of phase I oncology trials: The Cancer Research UK experience. Eur. J. Cancer 66, 9–16 (2016). · DOI
  15. Hanker, A. B., Kaklamani, V. & Arteaga, C. L. Challenges for the clinical development of PI3K inhibitors: strategies to improve their impact in solid tumors. Cancer Discov. 9, 482–491 (2019). · DOI
  16. Bullock, J. M., Rahman, A. & Liu, Q. Lessons learned: dose selection of small molecule-targeted oncology drugs. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 2630–2638 (2016). · DOI
  17. Waldner, M., Fantus, D., Solari, M. & Thomson, A. W. New perspectives on mTOR inhibitors (rapamycin, rapalogs and TORKinibs) in transplantation. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 82, 1158–1170 (2016). · DOI
  18. Tyagi, P. & Santiago, C. New features in MEK retinopathy. BMC Ophthalmol. 18, 221–221 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Khan, K. H. et al. Hyperglycemia and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) inhibitors in phase I trials: incidence, predictive factors, and management. Oncologist 21, 855–860 (2016). · DOI
  20. Touyz, R. M., Herrmann, S. M. S. & Herrmann, J. Vascular toxicities with VEGF inhibitor therapies–focus on hypertension and arterial thrombotic events. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 12, 409–425 (2018). · DOI
  21. Touyz, R. M. & Herrmann, J. Cardiotoxicity with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor therapy. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2, 13 (2018). · DOI
  22. Massey, P. R., Okman, J. S., Wilkerson, J. & Cowen, E. W. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) have distinct cutaneous toxicity profiles: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Support. Care Cancer 23, 1827–1835 (2015). · DOI
  23. Thill, M. & Schmidt, M. Management of adverse events during cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor-based treatment in breast cancer. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1177/175883591879332 (2018). · DOI
  24. Hantschel, O. Unexpected off-targets and paradoxical pathway activation by kinase Inhibitors. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 234–245 (2015). A description of on-target toxicity of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors. · DOI
  25. Force, T., Krause, D. S. & Van Etten, R. A. Molecular mechanisms of cardiotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibition. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 332–344 (2007). · DOI
  26. Miyazawa, K. Encountering unpredicted off-target effects of pharmacological inhibitors. J. Biochem. 150, 1–3 (2011). · DOI
  27. de Groot, C. O. et al. A cell biologist’s field guide to aurora kinase inhibitors. Front. Oncol. 5, 285 (2015). · DOI
  28. Roberts, A. W. et al. Phase 1 study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumour activity of the BCL2 inhibitor navitoclax in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory CD20+ lymphoid malignancies. Br. J. Haematol. 170, 669–678 (2015). · DOI
  29. Cang, S., Iragavarapu, C., Savooji, J., Song, Y. & Liu, D. ABT-199 (venetoclax) and BCL-2 inhibitors in clinical development. J. Hematol. Oncol. 8, 129 (2015). · DOI
  30. Bazak, R., Houri, M., El Achy, S., Kamel, S. & Refaat, T. Cancer active targeting by nanoparticles: a comprehensive review of literature. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 141, 769–784 (2015). · DOI
  31. Kantarjian, H. M. et al. Stage I of a phase 2 study assessing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of barasertib (AZD1152) versus low-dose cytosine arabinoside in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 119, 2611–2619 (2013). · DOI
  32. Ashton, S. et al. Aurora kinase inhibitor nanoparticles target tumors with favorable therapeutic index in vivo. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 325ra17 (2016). · DOI
  33. Keen, N. & Taylor, S. Mitotic drivers — inhibitors of the Aurora B Kinase. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 28, 185–195 (2009). · DOI
  34. Burris, H. A. et al. A phase I, open-label, first-time-in-patient dose escalation and expansion study to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of nanoparticle encapsulated Aurora B kinase inhibitor AZD2811 in patients with advanced solid tumours. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 15 (2017). · DOI
  35. Shamay, Y. et al. P-selectin is a nanotherapeutic delivery target in the tumor microenvironment. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 345ra87 (2016). · DOI
  36. Bachelet, L. et al. Affinity of low molecular weight fucoidan for P-selectin triggers its binding to activated human platelets. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1790, 141–146 (2009). · DOI
  37. Mizrachi, A. et al. Tumour-specific PI3K inhibition via nanoparticle-targeted delivery in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 8, 14292 (2017). · DOI
  38. Zumsteg, Z. S. et al. Taselisib (GDC-0032), a potent β-sparing small molecule inhibitor of PI3K, radiosensitizes head and neck squamous carcinomas containing activating PIK3CA alterations. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 2009–2019 (2016). · DOI
  39. Horn, D., Hess, J., Freier, K., Hoffmann, J. & Freudlsperger, C. Targeting EGFR-PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling enhances radiosensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 19, 795–805 (2015). · DOI
  40. Josephs, D. H., Fisher, D. S., Spicer, J. & Flanagan, R. J. Clinical pharmacokinetics of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther. Drug Monit. 35, 562–587 (2013). · DOI
  41. van Erp, N. P., Gelderblom, H. & Guchelaar, H. J. Clinical pharmacokinetics of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Treat. Rev. 35, 692–706 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  42. Wells, S. A. et al. Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 134–141 (2012). · DOI
  43. Poggi, L. & Kolesar, J. M. Vismodegib for the treatment of basal cell skin cancer. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 70, 1033–1038 (2013). · DOI
  44. Goel, V. et al. Population pharmacokinetics of sonidegib (LDE225), an oral inhibitor of hedgehog pathway signaling, in healthy subjects and in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 77, 745–755 (2016). · DOI
  45. Burris, H. A. 3rd et al. Phase I safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity study of lapatinib (GW572016), a reversible dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic carcinomas. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 5305–5313 (2005). · DOI
  46. Kramkimel, N. et al. Vemurafenib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with efficacy and safety in outpatients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma. Target. Oncol. 11, 59–69 (2016). · DOI
  47. Wagner, M. C. et al. Nilotinib shows prolonged intracellular accumulation upon pulse-exposure: a novel mechanism for induction of apoptosis in CML cells. Leukemia 27, 1567–1570 (2013). · DOI
  48. Lipka, D. B., Wagner, M. C., Dziadosz, M. & Fischer, T. Prolonged cellular midostaurin retention suggests potential alternative dosing strategies for FLT3-ITD-positive leukemias. Leukemia 30, 2090–2093 (2016). · DOI
  49. Schafranek, L. et al. Sustained inhibition of STAT5, but not JAK2, is essential for TKI-induced cell death in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 29, 76–85 (2015). · DOI
  50. Vasconcelos, T., Sarmento, B. & Costa, P. Solid dispersions as strategy to improve oral bioavailability of poor water soluble drugs. Drug Discov. Today 12, 1068–1075 (2007). · DOI
  51. Farouk, F. & Shamma, R. Chemical structure modifications and nano-technology applications for improving ADME-Tox properties, a review. Arch. Pharm. 352, 1800213 (2019). · DOI
  52. Chow, E. K. & Ho, D. Cancer nanomedicine: from drug delivery to imaging. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 216rv14 (2013). · DOI
  53. Sykes, E. A. et al. Tailoring nanoparticle designs to target cancer based on tumor pathophysiology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E1142–E1151 (2016). · DOI
  54. Carmeliet, P. & Jain, R. K. Principles and mechanisms of vessel normalization for cancer and other angiogenic diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 417–427 (2011). · DOI
  55. Peng, F. et al. Nanoparticles promote in vivo breast cancer cell intravasation and extravasation by inducing endothelial leakiness. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 279–286 (2019). · DOI
  56. Boulikas, T. Clinical overview on Lipoplatin: a successful liposomal formulation of cisplatin. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 18, 1197–1218 (2009). · DOI
  57. Reddy, L. H. & Couvreur, P. Nanotechnology for therapy and imaging of liver diseases. J. Hepatol. 55, 1461–1466 (2011). · DOI
  58. In, G. K. & Nieva, J. Emerging chemotherapy agents in lung cancer: nanoparticles therapeutics for non-small cell lung cancer. Transl. Cancer Res. 4, 340–355 (2015).
  59. Heller, D. A. et al. Modular ‘click-in-emulsion’ bone-targeted nanogels. Adv. Mater. 25, 1449–1454 (2013). · DOI
  60. Sago, C. D. et al. Nanoparticles that deliver RNA to bone marrow identified by in vivo directed evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 17095–17105 (2018). · DOI
  61. Alidori, S. et al. Targeted fibrillar nanocarbon RNAi treatment of acute kidney injury. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 331ra39 (2016). · DOI
  62. Williams, R. M. et al. Selective nanoparticle targeting of the renal tubules. Hypertension 71, 87–94 (2018). · DOI
  63. Williams, R. M. et al. Mesoscale nanoparticles selectively target the renal proximal tubule epithelium. Nano Lett. 15, 2358–2364 (2015). · DOI
  64. Choi, C. H. J., Zuckerman, J. E., Webster, P. & Davis, M. E. Targeting kidney mesangium by nanoparticles of defined size. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6656–6661 (2011). · DOI
  65. Zuckerman, J. E., Choi, C. H. J., Han, H. & Davis, M. E. Polycation-siRNA nanoparticles can disassemble at the kidney glomerular basement membrane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3137–3142 (2012). · DOI
  66. Lee, H. et al. An endoscope with integrated transparent bioelectronics and theranostic nanoparticles for colon cancer treatment. Nat. Commun. 6, 10059 (2015). · DOI
  67. Elci, S. G. et al. Surface charge controls the suborgan biodistributions of gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 10, 5536–5542 (2016). · DOI
  68. Hirn, S. et al. Particle size-dependent and surface charge-dependent biodistribution of gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 77, 407–416 (2011). · DOI
  69. Thapa, B., Kumar, P., Zeng, H. B. & Narain, R. Asialoglycoprotein receptor-mediated gene delivery to hepatocytes using galactosylated polymers. Biomacromolecules 16, 3008–3020 (2015). · DOI
  70. Han, J. et al. Acute and chronic shear stress differently regulate endothelial internalization of nanocarriers targeted to platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1. ACS Nano 6, 8824–8836 (2012). · DOI
  71. Parhiz, H. et al. PECAM-1 directed re-targeting of exogenous mRNA providing two orders of magnitude enhancement of vascular delivery and expression in lungs independent of apolipoprotein E-mediated uptake. J. Control. Rel. 291, 106–115 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  72. Dan, M., Cochran, D. B., Yokel, R. A. & Dziubla, T. D. Binding, transcytosis and biodistribution of anti-PECAM-1 iron oxide nanoparticles for brain-targeted delivery. PLoS ONE 8, e81051 (2013). · DOI
  73. Reychler, G. & Michotte, J. B. Development challenges and opportunities in aerosol drug delivery systems in non-invasive ventilation in adults. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 16, 153–162 (2019). · DOI
  74. Mainprize, T. et al. Blood-brain barrier opening in primary brain tumors with non-invasive MR-guided focused ultrasound: a clinical safety and feasibility study. Sci. Rep. 9, 321 (2019). · DOI
  75. Wang, C., Ye, Y., Hochu, G. M., Sadeghifar, H. & Gu, Z. Enhanced cancer immunotherapy by microneedle patch-assisted delivery of anti-PD1 antibody. Nano Lett. 16, 2334–2340 (2016). · DOI
  76. Shi, J., Kantoff, P. W., Wooster, R. & Farokhzad, O. C. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 20–37 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  77. Hrkach, J. et al. Preclinical development and clinical translation of a PSMA-targeted docetaxel nanoparticle with a differentiated pharmacological profile. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 128ra39 (2012). · DOI
  78. Wang, Y., Huang, H. Y., Yang, L., Zhang, Z. & Ji, H. Cetuximab-modified mesoporous silica nano-medicine specifically targets EGFR-mutant lung cancer and overcomes drug resistance. Sci. Rep. 6, 25468 (2016). · DOI
  79. Shamay, Y., Golan, M., Tyomkin, D. & David, A. Assessing the therapeutic efficacy of VEGFR-1-targeted polymer drug conjugates in mouse tumor models. J. Control. Rel. 229, 192–199 (2016). · DOI
  80. Oh, P. et al. In vivo proteomic imaging analysis of caveolae reveals pumping system to penetrate solid tumors. Nat. Med. 20, 1062–1068 (2014). · DOI
  81. Shamay, Y., Paulin, D., Ashkenasy, G. & David, A. E-selectin binding peptide–polymer–drug conjugates and their selective cytotoxicity against vascular endothelial cells. Biomaterials 30, 6460–6468 (2009). · DOI
  82. Shamay, Y. et al. Inhibition of primary and metastatic tumors in mice by E-selectin-targeted polymer-drug conjugates. J. Control. Rel. 217, 102–112 (2015). · DOI
  83. Seguin, L., Desgrosellier, J. S., Weis, S. M. & Cheresh, D. A. Integrins and cancer: regulators of cancer stemness, metastasis, and drug resistance. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 234–240 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  84. Hallahan, D. E. et al. Targeting drug delivery to radiation-induced neoantigens in tumor microvasculature. J. Control. Rel. 74, 183–191 (2001). · DOI
  85. Temming, K. et al. Delivery of the p38 MAPkinase inhibitor SB202190 to angiogenic endothelial cells: development of novel RGD-equipped and PEGylated drug–albumin conjugates using platinum(II)-based drug linker technology. Bioconjug. Chem. 17, 1246–1255 (2006). · DOI
  86. Li, X. et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of RGD-conjugated MEK1/2 kinase inhibitors for integrin-targeted cancer therapy. Molecules 18, 13957–13978 (2013). · DOI
  87. Chandarlapaty, S. Negative feedback and adaptive resistance to the targeted therapy of cancer. Cancer Discov. 2, 311–319 (2012). · DOI
  88. Carracedo, A. et al. Inhibition of mTORC1 leads to MAPK pathway activation through a PI3K-dependent feedback loop in human cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 3065–3074 (2008).
  89. O’Reilly, K. E. et al. mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt. Cancer Res. 66, 1500–1508 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  90. Sergina, N. V. et al. Escape from HER-family tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy by the kinase-inactive HER3. Nature 445, 437–441 (2007). · DOI
  91. Coffee, E. M. et al. Concomitant BRAF and PI3K/mTOR blockade is required for effective treatment of BRAF(V600E) colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 2688–2698 (2013). · DOI
  92. Wee, S. et al. PI3K pathway activation mediates resistance to MEK inhibitors in KRAS mutant cancers. Cancer Res. 69, 4286–4293 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  93. Murillo, M. M. et al. RAS interaction with PI3K p110alpha is required for tumor-induced angiogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 3601–3611 (2014). · DOI
  94. Chandarlapaty, S. et al. AKT inhibition relieves feedback suppression of receptor tyrosine kinase expression and activity. Cancer Cell 19, 58–71 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  95. Serra, V. et al. PI3K inhibition results in enhanced HER signaling and acquired ERK dependency in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. Oncogene 30, 2547–2557 (2011). · DOI
  96. Chakrabarty, A., Sanchez, V., Kuba, M. G., Rinehart, C. & Arteaga, C. L. Feedback upregulation of HER3 (ErbB3) expression and activity attenuates antitumor effect of PI3K inhibitors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2718–2723 (2012). · DOI
  97. Garrett, J. T. et al. Transcriptional and posttranslational up-regulation of HER3 (ErbB3) compensates for inhibition of the HER2 tyrosine kinase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5021–5026 (2011). · DOI
  98. Tao, J. J. et al. Antagonism of EGFR and HER3 enhances the response to inhibitors of the PI3K-Akt pathway in triple-negative breast cancer. Sci. Signal. 7, ra29 (2014). · DOI
  99. Carver, B. S. et al. Reciprocal feedback regulation of PI3K and androgen receptor signaling in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 19, 575–586 (2011). · DOI
  100. Bosch, A. et al. PI3K inhibition results in enhanced estrogen receptor function and dependence in hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 283ra51 (2015). · DOI
  101. Toska, E. et al. PI3K pathway regulates ER-dependent transcription in breast cancer through the epigenetic regulator KMT2D. Science 355, 1324–1330 (2017). · DOI
  102. Dickler, M. N. et al. A phase II study of the PI3K inhibitor taselisib (GDC-0032) combined with fulvestrant (F) in patients (pts) with HER2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (BC). J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 520 (2016). · DOI
  103. Saura, C. et al. Primary results of LORELEI: a phase II randomized, double-blind study of neoadjuvant letrozole (LET) plus taselisib versus LET plus placebo (PLA) in postmenopausal patients (pts) with ER+/HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC). Ann. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx440.001 (2017). · DOI
  104. Juvekar, A. et al. Combining a PI3K inhibitor with a PARP inhibitor provides an effective therapy for BRCA1-related breast cancer. Cancer Discov. 2, 1048–1063 (2012). · DOI
  105. Sun, C. et al. Rational combination therapy with PARP and MEK inhibitors capitalizes on therapeutic liabilities in RAS mutant cancers. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaal5148 (2017). · DOI
  106. Lee, H.-Y. et al. Response of non-small cell lung cancer cells to the inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt- and MAPK kinase 4/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase pathways: an effective therapeutic strategy for lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 6065–6074 (2005). · DOI
  107. Duong, H.-Q., Kim, H. J., Kang, H. J., Seong, Y.-S. & Bae, I. ZSTK474, a PI3K inhibitor, suppresses proliferation and sensitizes to gemcitabine in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep. 27, 182–188 (2012).
  108. Dreaden, E. C. et al. Tumor-targeted synergistic blockade of MAPK and PI3K from a layer-by-layer nanoparticle. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 4410–4419 (2015). A notable example of the use of nanomedicine to enable a therapeutic combination to combat drug resistance and avoid toxicity of kinase inhibitors. · DOI
  109. Pisarevsky, E. et al. Rational design of polyglutamic acid delivering an optimized combination of drugs targeting mutated BRAF and MEK in melanoma. Adv. Ther. https://doi.org/10.1002/adtp.202000028 (2020). · DOI
  110. Morton, S. W. et al. A nanoparticle-based combination chemotherapy delivery system for enhanced tumor killing by dynamic rewiring of signaling pathways. Sci. Signal. 7, ra44 (2014). · DOI
  111. Ibrahim, Y. H. et al. PI3K inhibition impairs BRCA1/2 expression and sensitizes BRCA-proficient triple-negative breast cancer to PARP inhibition. Cancer Discov. 2, 1036–1047 (2012). · DOI
  112. Ting, A. H., Schuebel, K. E., Herman, J. G. & Baylin, S. B. Short double-stranded RNA induces transcriptional gene silencing in human cancer cells in the absence of DNA methylation. Nat. Genet. 37, 906–910 (2005). · DOI
  113. Xu, C.-f & Wang, J. Delivery systems for siRNA drug development in cancer therapy. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 10, 1–12 (2015). · DOI
  114. Jackson, A. L. & Linsley, P. S. Recognizing and avoiding siRNA off-target effects for target identification and therapeutic application. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 57–67 (2010). · DOI
  115. Wang, J., Lu, Z., Wientjes, M. G. & Au, J. L. S. Delivery of siRNA therapeutics: barriers and carriers. AAPS J. 12, 492–503 (2010). · DOI
  116. Wong, A. W., Baginski, T. K. & Reilly, D. E. Enhancement of DNA uptake in FUT8-deleted CHO cells for transient production of afucosylated antibodies. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 106, 751–763 (2010). · DOI
  117. Kim, Y. G., Cha, J. & Chandrasegaran, S. Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 1156–1160 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  118. Chou, S. T., Leng, Q. & Mixson, A. J. Zinc finger nucleases: tailor-made for gene therapy. Drugs Future 37, 183–196 (2012). · DOI
  119. LaFountaine, J. S., Fathe, K. & Smyth, H. D. C. Delivery and therapeutic applications of gene editing technologies ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9. Int. J. Pharm. 494, 180–194 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  120. Mussolino, C. et al. A novel TALE nuclease scaffold enables high genome editing activity in combination with low toxicity. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 9283–9293 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  121. Zhu, H. et al. Baculoviral transduction facilitates TALEN-mediated targeted transgene integration and Cre/LoxP cassette exchange in human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e180 (2013). · DOI
  122. Hu, Z. et al. TALEN-mediated targeting of HPV oncogenes ameliorates HPV-related cervical malignancy. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 425–436 (2015). · DOI
  123. Ru, R. et al. Targeted genome engineering in human induced pluripotent stem cells by penetrating TALENs. Cell Regen. 2, 5 (2013). · DOI
  124. Liu, J., Gaj, T., Patterson, J. T., Sirk, S. J. & Barbas III, C. F. Cell-penetrating peptide-mediated delivery of TALEN proteins via bioconjugation for genome engineering. PLoS ONE 9, e85755 (2014). · DOI
  125. Cheng, R. et al. Efficient gene editing in adult mouse livers via adenoviral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9. FEBS Lett. 588, 3954–3958 (2014). · DOI
  126. Putnam, D. Polymers for gene delivery across length scales. Nat. Mater. 5, 439–451 (2006). · DOI
  127. Davis, M. E. The first targeted delivery of siRNA in humans via a self-assembling, cyclodextrin polymer-based nanoparticle: from concept to clinic. Mol. Pharm. 6, 659–668 (2009). · DOI
  128. Love, K. T. et al. Lipid-like materials for low-dose, in vivo gene silencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1864–1869 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  129. Monopoli, M. P., Aberg, C., Salvati, A. & Dawson, K. A. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nat. Nano 7, 779–786 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  130. Ando, H. et al. Polycation liposomes as a vector for potential intracellular delivery of microRNA. J. Gene Med. 15, 375–383 (2013). · DOI
  131. Kim, J. S., Oh, M. H., Park, J. Y., Park, T. G. & Nam, Y. S. Protein-resistant, reductively dissociable polyplexes for in vivo systemic delivery and tumor-targeting of siRNA. Biomaterials 34, 2370–2379 (2013). · DOI
  132. Guo, J. et al. Systemic delivery of therapeutic small interfering RNA using a pH-triggered amphiphilic poly-l-lysine nanocarrier to suppress prostate cancer growth in mice. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 45, 521–532 (2012). · DOI
  133. Weinstein, S. et al. Harnessing RNAi-based nanomedicines for therapeutic gene silencing in B-cell malignancies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E16–E22 (2016). · DOI
  134. Tabernero, J. et al. First-in-humans trial of an RNA interference therapeutic targeting VEGF and KSP in cancer patients with liver involvement. Cancer Discov. 3, 406–417 (2013). · DOI
  135. Liang, X. et al. Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. J. Biotechnol. 208, 44–53 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  136. Zuris, J. A. et al. Efficient delivery of genome-editing proteins in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 73–80 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  137. Wang, M. et al. Efficient delivery of genome-editing proteins using bioreducible lipid nanoparticles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2868–2873 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  138. Platt, R. J. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling. Cell 159, 440–455 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  139. Wei, T., Cheng, Q., Min, Y.-L., Olson, E. N. & Siegwart, D. J. Systemic nanoparticle delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins for effective tissue specific genome editing. Nat. Commun. 11, 3232 (2020). · DOI
  140. Hu, Q. et al. Conjugation of haematopoietic stem cells and platelets decorated with anti-PD-1 antibodies augments anti-leukaemia efficacy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 831–840 (2018). · DOI
  141. Chen, Q. et al. Photothermal therapy promotes tumor infiltration and antitumor activity of CAR T cells. Adv. Mater. 31, 1900192 (2019). · DOI
  142. Menon, S., Shin, S. & Dy, G. Advances in cancer immunotherapy in solid tumors. Cancers 8, 106 (2016). · DOI
  143. de Charette, M., Marabelle, A. & Houot, R. Turning tumour cells into antigen presenting cells: The next step to improve cancer immunotherapy? Eur. J. Cancer 68, 134–147 (2016). · DOI
  144. Santomasso, B., Bachier, C., Westin, J., Rezvani, K. & Shpall, E. J. The other side of CAR T-cell therapy: cytokine release syndrome, neurologic toxicity, and financial burden. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 39, 433–444 (2019). · DOI
  145. Jo, S. D., Nam, G.-H., Kwak, G., Yang, Y. & Kwon, I. Harnessing designed nanoparticles: Current strategies and future perspectives in cancer immunotherapy. Nano Today 17, 23–37 (2017). · DOI
  146. Nam, J. et al. Cancer nanomedicine for combination cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 398–414 (2019). Opportunities for combination immunotherapy based on nanoparticle platforms designed for chemotherapy, photothermal therapy, photodynamic therapy, radiotherapy and gene therapy. · DOI
  147. Liu, Z., Jiang, W., Nam, J., Moon, J. J. & Kim, B. Y. S. Immunomodulating nanomedicine for cancer therapy. Nano Lett. 18, 6655–6659 (2018). · DOI
  148. Zhang, L.-x, Xie, X.-x, Liu, D.-q, Xu, Z. P. & Liu, R.-t Efficient co-delivery of neo-epitopes using dispersion-stable layered double hydroxide nanoparticles for enhanced melanoma immunotherapy. Biomaterials 174, 54–66 (2018). · DOI
  149. Alskar, L. C., Porter, C. J. & Bergstrom, C. A. Tools for early prediction of drug loading in lipid-based formulations. Mol. Pharm. 13, 251–261 (2016). · DOI
  150. Kuai, R., Ochyl, L. J., Bahjat, K. S., Schwendeman, A. & Moon, J. J. Designer vaccine nanodiscs for personalized cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Mater. 16, 489–496 (2016). · DOI
  151. Jeanbart, L. et al. Enhancing efficacy of anticancer vaccines by targeted delivery to tumor-draining lymph nodes. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 436–447 (2014). · DOI
  152. Kim, J. et al. Injectable, spontaneously assembling, inorganic scaffolds modulate immune cells in vivo and increase vaccine efficacy. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 64–72 (2015). · DOI
  153. Li, A. W. et al. A facile approach to enhance antigen response for personalized cancer vaccination. Nat. Mater. 17, 528–534 (2018). · DOI
  154. Lu, K. et al. Low-dose X-ray radiotherapy–radiodynamic therapy via nanoscale metal–organic frameworks enhances checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 600–610 (2018). · DOI
  155. Sau, S. et al. Multifunctional nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy: A groundbreaking approach for reprogramming malfunctioned tumor environment. J. Control. Rel. 274, 24–34 (2018). · DOI
  156. Lu, C. et al. Phase I clinical trial of systemically administered TUSC2(FUS1)-nanoparticles mediating functional gene transfer in humans. PLoS ONE 7, e34833 (2012). · DOI
  157. Ji, L. et al. Expression of several genes in the human chromosome 3p21.3 homozygous deletion region by an adenovirus vector results in tumor suppressor activities in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 62, 2715–2720 (2002).
  158. Demeure, M. J. et al. A phase I/II study of TKM-080301, a PLK1-targeted RNAi in patients with adrenocortical cancer (ACC). J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 2547–2547 (2016). · DOI
  159. Sarker, D. et al. First-in-human, first-in-class phase I study of MTL-CEBPA, a small activating RNA (saRNA) targeting the transcription factor C/EBP-α in patients with advanced liver cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, TPS2612 (2017). · DOI
  160. Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M. et al. Weekly nab-rapamycin in patients with advanced nonhematologic malignancies: final results of a phase I trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 5474–5484 (2013). · DOI
  161. Plummer, R. et al. A Phase I clinical study of cisplatin-incorporated polymeric micelles (NC-6004) in patients with solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 104, 593–598 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  162. Shamay, Y. Quantitative prediction of self assembly yields tumor targeted nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 17, 361–368 (2018). Predicting drug encapsulation into nanocarriers based on drug molecular structure. · DOI
  163. Tuomela, A., Hirvonen, J. & Peltonen, L. Stabilizing agents for drug nanocrystals: effect on bioavailability. Pharmaceutics 8, 16 (2016). · DOI
  164. Guo, S. & Huang, L. Nanoparticles containing insoluble drug for cancer therapy. Biotechnol. Adv. 32, 778–788 (2014). · DOI
  165. Woodhead, J. L. & Hall, C. K. Encapsulation efficiency and micellar structure of solute-carrying block copolymer nanoparticles. Macromolecules 44, 5443–5451 (2011). · DOI
  166. Dinarvand, R., Sepehri, N., Manoochehri, S., Rouhani, H. & Atyabi, F. Polylactide-co-glycolide nanoparticles for controlled delivery of anticancer agents. Int. J. Nanomed. 6, 877–895 (2011). · DOI
  167. Maojo, V. et al. Nanoinformatics: a new area of research in nanomedicine. Int. J. Nanomed. 7, 3867–3890 (2012). · DOI
  168. Seidler, J., McGovern, S. L., Doman, T. N. & Shoichet, B. K. Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs. J. Med. Chem. 46, 4477–4486 (2003). · DOI
  169. Irwin, J. J. et al. An aggregation advisor for ligand discovery. J. Med. Chem. 58, 7076–7087 (2015). · DOI
  170. Feng, B. Y., Shelat, A., Doman, T. N., Guy, R. K. & Shoichet, B. K. High-throughput assays for promiscuous inhibitors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 146–148 (2005). · DOI
  171. Puzyn, T. et al. Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 175–178 (2011). · DOI
  172. Zhang, Y. et al. Lipid-modified aminoglycoside derivatives for in vivo siRNA delivery. Adv. Mater. 25, 4641–4645 (2013). · DOI
  173. Guo, C., Luo, Y., Zhou, R. & Wei, G. Probing the self-assembly mechanism of diphenylalanine-based peptide nanovesicles and nanotubes. ACS Nano 6, 3907–3918 (2012). · DOI
  174. Guo, C., Luo, Y., Zhou, R. & Wei, G. Triphenylalanine peptides self-assemble into nanospheres and nanorods that are different from the nanovesicles and nanotubes formed by diphenylalanine peptides. Nanoscale 6, 2800–2811 (2014). · DOI
  175. Lee, O. S., Stupp, S. I. & Schatz, G. C. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of peptide amphiphile self-assembly into cylindrical nanofibers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 3677–3683 (2011). · DOI
  176. Frederix, P. W. et al. Exploring the sequence space for (tri-)peptide self-assembly to design and discover new hydrogels. Nat. Chem. 7, 30–37 (2015). · DOI
  177. Shi, C. et al. A drug-specific nanocarrier design for efficient anticancer therapy. Nat. Commun. 6, 7449 (2015). De novo nanocarrier design based on drug structure to enhance activity. · DOI
  178. Yaari, Z. et al. Theranostic barcoded nanoparticles for personalized cancer medicine. Nat. Commun. 7, 13325 (2016). · DOI
  179. Gebhart, G. et al. Molecular imaging as a tool to investigate heterogeneity of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer and to predict patient outcome under trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): the ZEPHIR trial. Ann. Oncol. 27, 619–624 (2016). · DOI
  180. Perez-Gracia, J. L. et al. Strategies to design clinical studies to identify predictive biomarkers in cancer research. Cancer Treat. Rev. 53, 79–97 (2017). · DOI
  181. Arai, N., Sasaki, H., Tamura, R., Ohara, K. & Yoshida, K. Unusual magnetic resonance imaging findings of a glioblastoma arising during treatment with lenvatinib for thyroid cancer. World Neurosurg. 107, 1047.e9–1047.e15 (2017). · DOI
  182. Man, F., Lammers, T. & de Rosales, R. T. M. Imaging nanomedicine-based drug delivery: a review of clinical studies. Mol. Imaging Biol. 20, 683–695 (2018). A review of clinical data on the imaging of nanoparticle uptake into tumours to predict efficacy of drug delivery in tumours. · DOI
  183. Weickhardt, A. J. et al. Rapid-onset hypogonadism secondary to crizotinib use in men with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 118, 5302–5309 (2012). · DOI
  184. Lee, H. et al. (64)Cu-MM-302 positron emission tomography quantifies variability of enhanced permeability and retention of nanoparticles in relation to treatment response in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 4190–4202 (2017). · DOI
  185. Lammers, T. et al. Cancer nanomedicine: is targeting our target? Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16069 (2016). · DOI
  186. Schmid, D. et al. T cell-targeting nanoparticles focus delivery of immunotherapy to improve antitumor immunity. Nat. Commun. 8, 1747 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  187. Lucky, S. S., Soo, K. C. & Zhang, Y. Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy. Chem. Rev. 115, 1990–2042 (2015). · DOI
  188. Tinkle, S. et al. Nanomedicines: addressing the scientific and regulatory gap. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1313, 35–56 (2014). · DOI
  189. Crist, R. M. et al. Common pitfalls in nanotechnology: lessons learned from NCI’s Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory. Integr. Biol. 5, 66–73 (2013). Trends in nanoparticle safety and biocompatibility, and common mistakes regarding nanoparticle development for translation. · DOI
  190. Piret, J.-P. et al. Pan-European inter-laboratory studies on a panel of in vitro cytotoxicity and pro-inflammation assays for nanoparticles. Arch. Toxicol. 91, 2315–2330 (2017). · DOI
  191. Kantarjian, H. M. et al. Bosutinib safety and management of toxicity in leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Blood 9, 1309–1318 (2014). · DOI
  192. Hauschild, A. et al. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 380, 358–365 (2012). · DOI
  193. Robert, C. et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 30–39 (2015). · DOI
  194. Welsh, S. J. & Corrie, P. G. Management of BRAF and MEK inhibitor toxicities in patients with metastatic melanoma. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 7, 122–136 (2015). · DOI
  195. Flaherty, K. T. et al. Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 107–114 (2012). · DOI
  196. Wells, E. M., Rao, A. A. N., Scafidi, J. & Packer, R. J. Neurotoxicity of biologically targeted agents in pediatric cancer trials. Pediatr. Neurol. 46, 212–221 (2012). · DOI
  197. Dreyling, M. et al. Phase 2A study of copanlisib, aNnovel PI3K Inhibitor, in patients with indolent lymphoma. Blood 124, 1701 (2014). · DOI
  198. Younes, A. et al. An open-label phase II study of buparlisib (BKM120) in patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma. Blood 124, 1718 (2014). · DOI
  199. Younes, A. et al. An open-label phase II study of buparlisib (BKM120) in patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). Blood 126, 1493 (2015). · DOI
  200. Coutré, S. E. et al. Management of adverse events associated with idelalisib treatment: expert panel opinion. Leuk. Lymphoma 56, 2779–2786 (2015). · DOI · Paper page

200 of 297 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,183

Metadata

Authors
Manzari, M. T., Shamay, Y., Kiguchi, H., Rosen, N., Scaltriti, M., & Heller, D. A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Materials
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
351-370
ISSN
2058-8437
DOI
10.1038/s41578-020-00269-6
PMC
PMC8691416
Cited by
1,183
References
28
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review