Cited by 365Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial Infections and Vaccines

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 203 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook

Open access
Iyer, Kali R., Revie, Nicole M., Fu, Ci, Robbins, Nicole, Cowen, Leah E.·2021·Nature Reviews Microbiology

Abstract

Cryptococcus spp., in particular Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, have an enormous impact on human health worldwide. The global burden of cryptococcal meningitis is almost a quarter of a million cases and 181,000 deaths annually, with mortality rates of 100% if infections remain untreated. Despite these alarming statistics, treatment options for cryptococcosis remain limited, with only three major classes of drugs approved for clinical use. Exacerbating the public health burden is the fact that the only new class of antifungal drugs developed in decades, the echinocandins, displays negligible antifungal activity against Cryptococcus spp., and the efficacy of the remaining therapeutics is hampered by host toxicity and pathogen resistance. Here, we describe the current arsenal of antifungal agents and the treatment strategies employed to manage cryptococcal disease. We further elaborate on the recent advances in our understanding of the intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms that are utilized by Cryptococcus spp. to evade therapeutic treatments. Finally, we review potential therapeutic strategies, including combination therapy, the targeting of virulence traits, impairing stress response pathways and modulating host immunity, to effectively treat infections caused by Cryptococcus spp. Overall, understanding of the mechanisms that regulate anti-cryptococcal drug resistance, coupled with advances in genomics technologies and high-throughput screening methodologies, will catalyse innovation and accelerate antifungal drug discovery. Cryptococcosis is a serious fungal infection for which treatment options are limited. In this Review, Cowen and colleagues discuss the current antifungal treatments available for cryptococcal infections, the challenges in developing new treatments, and ongoing efforts to identify novel therapies.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review summarizes the limited current arsenal against cryptococcal infection, the intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms used by *Cryptococcus* spp., and emerging therapeutic strategies. It highlights combination therapy, virulence-factor and stress-response targeting, drug repurposing, and immunotherapy/vaccine approaches as promising but still mostly preclinical or early-clinical directions.

Key findings

  • Cryptococcal meningitis causes an estimated 223,100 cases and 181,100 deaths annually, with 100% mortality if untreated; only three major antifungal classes are approved, and echinocandins have negligible activity against *Cryptococcus* spp.
  • Resistance involves genomic plasticity, including aneuploidy (most commonly chromosome 1 disomy involving *ERG11* and *AFR1*), hypermutator strains with ~200-fold higher mutation rates, and transposon movement; hypermutator *C. gattii* strains showed a 15% higher rate of flucytosine resistance.
  • Morphological changes contribute to resistance: thicker capsules and cell walls increase antifungal resistance, and titan cells are defined by >10 µm size, >4C ploidy, a thick cell wall, and a highly crosslinked capsule; ~20% of fungal cells in mouse lungs can become titan cells.
  • The phase III amphotericin B plus flucytosine regimen followed by fluconazole reduced 10-week mortality to 24%, compared with ~70% mortality in many low- and middle-income African countries; repurposed sertraline and tamoxifen failed to improve outcomes in later trials.

Methods

  • Narrative review synthesizing published literature on cryptococcal treatment, antifungal resistance mechanisms, drug discovery, and immunotherapy; no primary experimental data are reported.
  • Evidence discussed includes clinical trials, mouse infection models, genomic and chemical-genetic screens, and high-throughput compound screens, such as >300,000 compounds screened for fungicidal activity and ~3,600 bioactive compounds tested for synergy.
  • No systematic search strategy, inclusion criteria, or meta-analysis is described.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: treatment is limited by intrinsic echinocandin resistance, azole resistance, amphotericin B toxicity, flucytosine resistance and monotherapy limitations, and poor access/cost in resource-limited settings; several promising agents remain preclinical or have failed clinical trials, and 18B7 showed poor cerebrospinal fluid penetration.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not provide a systematic or quantitative synthesis, and its conclusions depend on the selected cited literature rather than a predefined review protocol.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41579-021-00511-0

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

144 Not checked yet · 4 No basis given · 1 Own interpretation

Verify all 203 references — free account

Show all 98 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 47
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 5
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
51 of 51
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Virulence factors are not required for the growth of the pathogen but are crucial for causing disease.

    “Targeting virulence factors, which are not required for the growth of the pathogen but, instead, are crucial for causing disease, opens up a plethora of new targets for drug development.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The fungal cell wall is absent from mammalian cells.

    “This structure is absent from mammalian cells, and therefore great efforts have been made to develop antifungal agents that target this unique structure directly or that impair its biosynthesis.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most compound libraries have been designed to maximize drug-like properties with respect to mammalian targets and physiology, whereas antifungal drugs require unique physicochemical properties.

    “The development of new antifungal molecules remains a considerable challenge, as most compound libraries have been designed to maximize their ‘drug-like’ properties with respect to mammalian targets and physiology, whereas antifungal drugs require unique physicochemical properties, owing in part to the need for these molecules to transverse the fungal cell wall.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Antifungal molecules need good central nervous system penetration and should be able to be administered orally to ensure widespread access within developing countries with limited resources.

    “Furthermore, because of the unique neurological features of cryptococcal disease, antifungal molecules are needed that have good central nervous system penetration, and they should be able to be administered orally to ensure widespread access within developing countries with limited resources.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 161 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Chen, Y. et al. Microevolution of serial clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii and C. gattii. mBio 8, e00166-17 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Iyer, K. R., Revie, N. M., Fu, C., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Cowen, Leah E.
Venue
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Published
2021-02-08
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
454-466
ISSN
  • 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1534
OpenAlex
W3127236674
Cited by
363
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 35
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • National Institutes of Health (NIAID R21)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN154288)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI127375, R21AI141080, R01AI120958)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
cryptococcosis, cryptococcal meningitis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Cryptococcus gattii, antifungal resistance, echinocandins, combination therapy, stress response pathways, antifungal drug discovery, host-pathogen interaction
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Cell Wall, Cryptococcosis, Cryptococcus, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Virulence Factors, Echinocandins, Fungal Capsules, Fungal Polysaccharides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review