Cited by 61Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Single-cell transcriptomic landscape of the developing human spinal cord

Andersen, Jimena, Thom, Nicholas, Shadrach, Jennifer L., Chen, Xiaoyu, Onesto, Massimo Mario, Amin, Neal D., Yoon, Se-Jin, Li, Li +5 more·2023·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Understanding spinal cord assembly is essential to elucidate how motor behavior is controlled and how disorders arise. The human spinal cord is exquisitely organized, and this complex organization contributes to the diversity and intricacy of motor behavior and sensory processing. But how this complexity arises at the cellular level in the human spinal cord remains unknown. Here we transcriptomically profiled the midgestation human spinal cord with single-cell resolution and discovered remarkable heterogeneity across and within cell types. Glia displayed diversity related to positional identity along the dorso-ventral and rostro-caudal axes, while astrocytes with specialized transcriptional programs mapped into white and gray matter subtypes. Motor neurons clustered at this stage into groups suggestive of alpha and gamma neurons. We also integrated our data with multiple existing datasets of the developing human spinal cord spanning 22 weeks of gestation to investigate the cell diversity over time. Together with mapping of disease-related genes, this transcriptomic mapping of the developing human spinal cord opens new avenues for interrogating the cellular basis of motor control in humans and guides human stem cell-based models of disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-023-01311-w

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, J., Thom, N., Shadrach, J. L., Chen, X., Onesto, M. M., Amin, N. D., Yoon, S.-J., Li, L., Greenleaf, W. J., Müller, F., Pașca, A. M., Kaltschmidt, J. A., & Pașca, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Saarland University (DE)
Corresponding author
Pașca, Sergiu P.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2023-04-24
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
902-914
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W4366823419
Cited by
61
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
single-cell transcriptomics, midgestation, motor neurons, astrocytes, glial heterogeneity, dorsal-ventral axis, rostrocaudal axis, cell type diversity, disease-related genes, motor control
MeSH terms
Humans, Motor Neurons, Neuroglia, Spinal Cord, Transcriptome, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review