Cited by 137DNA and Biological ComputingAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesAlgorithms and Data Compression

Demonstration of End-to-End Automation of DNA Data Storage.

Open access
Takahashi, Christopher N., Nguyen, Bichlien H., Strauss, Karin, Ceze, Luis·2019·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Synthetic DNA has emerged as a novel substrate to encode computer data with the potential to be orders of magnitude denser than contemporary cutting edge techniques. However, even with the help of automated synthesis and sequencing devices, many intermediate steps still require expert laboratory technicians to execute. We have developed an automated end-to-end DNA data storage device to explore the challenges of automation within the constraints of this unique application. Our device encodes data into a DNA sequence, which is then written to a DNA oligonucleotide using a custom DNA synthesizer, pooled for liquid storage, and read using a nanopore sequencer and a novel, minimal preparation protocol. We demonstrate an automated 5-byte write, store, and read cycle with a modular design enabling expansion as new technology becomes available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-41228-8

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Willsey, M. et al. Puddle: A dynamic, error-correcting, full-stack microfluidics platform. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, ASPLOS’ 19 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takahashi, C. N., Nguyen, B. H., Strauss, K., & Ceze, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Takahashi, Christopher N.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-03-21
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
4998-4998
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897609915
Cited by
137
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Microsoft Research
  • United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911-NF-18-2-0034)
  • Defense Sciences Office, DARPA (W911-NF-18-2-0034)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
DNA data storage, synthetic DNA, end-to-end automation, nanopore sequencing, data encoding
MeSH terms
Automation, DNA, Humans, Information Storage and Retrieval, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review