Cited by 30Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Overlapping and unique neural circuits are activated during perceptual decision making and confidence

Open access
Yeon, Jiwon, Shekhar, Medha, Rahnev, Dobromir·2020·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The period of making a perceptual decision is often followed by a period of rating confidence where one evaluates the likely accuracy of the initial decision. However, it remains unclear whether the same or different neural circuits are engaged during periods of perceptual decision making and confidence report. To address this question, we conducted two functional MRI experiments in which we dissociated the periods related to perceptual decision making and confidence report by either separating their respective regressors or asking for confidence ratings only in the second half of the experiment. We found that perceptual decision making and confidence reports gave rise to activations in large and mostly overlapping brain circuits including frontal, parietal, posterior, and cingulate regions with the results being remarkably consistent across the two experiments. Further, the confidence report period activated a number of unique regions, whereas only early sensory areas were activated for the decision period across the two experiments. We discuss the possible reasons for this overlap and explore their implications about theories of perceptual decision making and visual metacognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-77820-6

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metacognitive judgments heighten activity in a network of prefrontal regions, notably dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and lateral frontopolar cortex.

    “Such comparisons have highlighted a network of prefrontal regions, notably dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and lateral frontopolar cortex, in which activity is heightened when metacognitive judgments are required (Fleming et al. 2012, Qiu et al. 2018, Yeon et al. 2020).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Yeon et al. 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [65]Weiskrantz L Blindsight: A Case Study and Its Implications 1986 Oxford Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeon, J., Shekhar, M., & Rahnev, D.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Yeon, Jiwon
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-11-27
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
20761-20761
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109138797
Cited by
30
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (N00014-20-1-2622)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01MH119189)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
perceptual decision making, confidence reports, metacognition, neural circuits, decision confidence, frontal cortex, parietal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, sensory processing
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motion Perception, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review