Cited by 140Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individual and additive effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and exercise on DNA methylation clocks of biological aging in older adults from the DO-HEALTH trial

Open access

Abstract

While observational studies and small pilot trials suggest that vitamin D, omega-3 and exercise may slow biological aging, larger clinical trials testing these treatments individually or in combination are lacking. Here, we report the results of a post hoc analysis among 777 participants of the DO-HEALTH trial on the effect of vitamin D (2,000 IU per day) and/or omega-3 (1 g per day) and/or a home exercise program on four next-generation DNA methylation (DNAm) measures of biological aging (PhenoAge, GrimAge, GrimAge2 and DunedinPACE) over 3 years. Omega-3 alone slowed the DNAm clocks PhenoAge, GrimAge2 and DunedinPACE, and all three treatments had additive benefits on PhenoAge. Overall, from baseline to year 3, standardized effects ranged from 0.16 to 0.32 units (2.9–3.8 months). In summary, our trial indicates a small protective effect of omega-3 treatment on slowing biological aging over 3 years across several clocks, with an additive protective effect of omega-3, vitamin D and exercise based on PhenoAge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43587-024-00793-y

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Flowchart of the DO-HEALTH Bio-Age trial in the Swiss subset of DO-HEALTH. The flowchart shows the allocation of participants across the eight treatment arms.
Fig. 1 Flowchart of the DO-HEALTH Bio-Age trial in the Swiss subset of DO-HEALTH. The flowchart shows the allocation of participants across the eight treatment arms.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Treatment effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and SHEP individually and in combination on changes in DNAm measures from baseline to year 3. a–d, Treatment effects are expressed as standardized estimates of the change in DNAm measures from baseline to year 3 at the respective 95% CI. For the PhenoAge (a) and GrimAge (b) clocks, we analyzed versions constructed from DNAm PCs, which have superior technical reliability compared to the original versions of these measures29. For GrimAge2 (c) and DunedinPACE (d), we used the original versions as they already demonstrate high technical reliability5,6,8. All analyses were done in samples of n = 777 participants sampled at baseline and the 3-year follow-up, without technical replicates. In a–d, estimates and 95% CIs from analyses of covariance adjusted for chronological age (continuous + spline at 85 years), sex, falls before the study, BMI, study site and the respective baseline biological age measures are shown. The graphs show the main effects under the assumption of additive effects between treatments in the 2 × 2 × 2 factorial trial design; that is, comparing all individuals treated with vitamin D across the eight treatment arms of the trial to those who did not receive vitamin D (same for omega-3 and SHEP compared to control SHEP). Only for GrimAge2 (c) is each treatment arm compared to placebo because of treatment interactions. Consistent effects of omega-3 were observed in decelerating biological aging as measured by PhenoAge (a), GrimAge2 (c) and DunedinPACE (d). PhenoAge additionally showed an additive benefit between treatments, as observed for the clinical outcomes incident prefrailty24 and incident invasive cancer25 in the same trial. Detailed findings are shown in Extended Data Table 3. For second-generation clocks, standardized units can be converted to months of age retardation using the following equation: (standardized estimate × s.d. + mean) × 12. Overall, the standardized treatment effects from baseline to year 3 were small, ranging from 0.16 to 0.32 units (2.9–3.8 months).
Fig. 2 Treatment effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and SHEP individually and in combination on changes in DNAm measures from baseline to year 3. a–d, Treatment effects are expressed as standardized estimates of the change in DNAm measures from baseline to year 3 at the respective 95% CI. For the PhenoAge (a) and GrimAge (b) clocks, we analyzed versions constructed from DNAm PCs, which have superior technical reliability compared to the original versions of these measures29. For GrimAge2 (c) and DunedinPACE (d), we used the original versions as they already demonstrate high technical reliability5,6,8. All analyses were done in samples of n = 777 participants sampled at baseline and the 3-year follow-up, without technical replicates. In a–d, estimates and 95% CIs from analyses of covariance adjusted for chronological age (continuous + spline at 85 years), sex, falls before the study, BMI, study site and the respective baseline biological age measures are shown. The graphs show the main effects under the assumption of additive effects between treatments in the 2 × 2 × 2 factorial trial design; that is, comparing all individuals treated with vitamin D across the eight treatment arms of the trial to those who did not receive vitamin D (same for omega-3 and SHEP compared to control SHEP). Only for GrimAge2 (c) is each treatment arm compared to placebo because of treatment interactions. Consistent effects of omega-3 were observed in decelerating biological aging as measured by PhenoAge (a), GrimAge2 (c) and DunedinPACE (d). PhenoAge additionally showed an additive benefit between treatments, as observed for the clinical outcomes incident prefrailty24 and incident invasive cancer25 in the same trial. Detailed findings are shown in Extended Data Table 3. For second-generation clocks, standardized units can be converted to months of age retardation using the following equation: (standardized estimate × s.d. + mean) × 12. Overall, the standardized treatment effects from baseline to year 3 were small, ranging from 0.16 to 0.32 units (2.9–3.8 months).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Treatment effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and SHEP individually and in combination on changes in DNAm-based surrogate biomarkers of plasma proteins based on GrimAge. a–g, For the seven DNAm-based surrogate markers of plasma proteins underlying GrimAge, we analyzed versions constructed from DNAm PCs. The seven DNAm-based biomarkers estimate the abundance of GDF-15 (a), PAI-1 (b), TIMP-1 (c), B2M (d), adrenomedullin (ADM; e), leptin (f) and cystatin C (g). All analyses were done in samples of n = 777 participants sampled at baseline and the 3-year follow-up, without technical replicates. In a–g, estimates and 95% CIs from analyses of covariance adjusted for chronological age (continuous + spline at 85 years), sex, falls before the study, BMI, study site and the respective baseline DNAm-based biomarkers are shown. Omega-3 stands out as an individual treatment with a decline in three of the seven DNAm-based surrogate biomarkers of plasma proteins (PAI-1, leptin and TIMP-1). However, the data also show a consistent additive benefit of combining two or all three treatments for several plasma proteins (PAI-1, B2M, TIMP-1 and GDF-15). Detailed findings are shown in Extended Data Table 4.
Fig. 3 Treatment effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and SHEP individually and in combination on changes in DNAm-based surrogate biomarkers of plasma proteins based on GrimAge. a–g, For the seven DNAm-based surrogate markers of plasma proteins underlying GrimAge, we analyzed versions constructed from DNAm PCs. The seven DNAm-based biomarkers estimate the abundance of GDF-15 (a), PAI-1 (b), TIMP-1 (c), B2M (d), adrenomedullin (ADM; e), leptin (f) and cystatin C (g). All analyses were done in samples of n = 777 participants sampled at baseline and the 3-year follow-up, without technical replicates. In a–g, estimates and 95% CIs from analyses of covariance adjusted for chronological age (continuous + spline at 85 years), sex, falls before the study, BMI, study site and the respective baseline DNAm-based biomarkers are shown. Omega-3 stands out as an individual treatment with a decline in three of the seven DNAm-based surrogate biomarkers of plasma proteins (PAI-1, leptin and TIMP-1). However, the data also show a consistent additive benefit of combining two or all three treatments for several plasma proteins (PAI-1, B2M, TIMP-1 and GDF-15). Detailed findings are shown in Extended Data Table 4.CC BY · PubMed Central
Extended Data Fig. 1 Second generation clocks, Pace of Aging and GrimAge-based plasma proteins explained. Overview of life-style factors associated with second generation DNAm biology of aging measures5,6,8 and DNA methylation based surrogate markers of plasma proteins. While DNAm clocks measure biological aging, surrogate proteins are ordinal/quantitative measures, where high values correspond to a higher hazard of mortality5,8. For more details and references on the DNAm clocks see Extended Data Table 5. Icons from Noun Project (https://thenounproject.com/).
Extended Data Fig. 1 Second generation clocks, Pace of Aging and GrimAge-based plasma proteins explained. Overview of life-style factors associated with second generation DNAm biology of aging measures5,6,8 and DNA methylation based surrogate markers of plasma proteins. While DNAm clocks measure biological aging, surrogate proteins are ordinal/quantitative measures, where high values correspond to a higher hazard of mortality5,8. For more details and references on the DNAm clocks see Extended Data Table 5. Icons from Noun Project (https://thenounproject.com/).CC BY · PubMed Central
Extended Data Fig. 2 Correlation of chronological age and biological age for DNAm clocks and Pace of Aging. All DNAm measures of age correlated with chronological age at baseline in DO-HEALTH including the pan tissue Horvath clock assessed with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient r = 0.56,), Hannum (r = 0.6), PhenoAge (r = 0.6), GrimAge (r = 0.92), and GrimAge2 (r = 0.71). The correlation between DunedinPACE and chronological age was substantially weaker (r = 0.19).
Extended Data Fig. 2 Correlation of chronological age and biological age for DNAm clocks and Pace of Aging. All DNAm measures of age correlated with chronological age at baseline in DO-HEALTH including the pan tissue Horvath clock assessed with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient r = 0.56,), Hannum (r = 0.6), PhenoAge (r = 0.6), GrimAge (r = 0.92), and GrimAge2 (r = 0.71). The correlation between DunedinPACE and chronological age was substantially weaker (r = 0.19).CC BY · PubMed Central
Extended Data Fig. 3 Stratified treatment effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and SHEP (simple home exercise program) individually and in combination on change of DNAm measures from baseline to year 3. Panels A and B show regression coefficients, and their 95% CI derived from analysis of covariance adjusted for chronological age (continuous + spline at 85 years), sex, falls before study, body mass index, study site, respective baseline biological age measure. All analyses were done in n = 777 participants sampled at baseline and at 3-year follow-up, without technical replicates. The treatment effects in Panel A are stratified by biological sex (male vs. female) and Panel B by chronological age (70-74 vs 75+ years).
Extended Data Fig. 3 Stratified treatment effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and SHEP (simple home exercise program) individually and in combination on change of DNAm measures from baseline to year 3. Panels A and B show regression coefficients, and their 95% CI derived from analysis of covariance adjusted for chronological age (continuous + spline at 85 years), sex, falls before study, body mass index, study site, respective baseline biological age measure. All analyses were done in n = 777 participants sampled at baseline and at 3-year follow-up, without technical replicates. The treatment effects in Panel A are stratified by biological sex (male vs. female) and Panel B by chronological age (70-74 vs 75+ years).CC BY · PubMed Central
Extended Data Fig. 4 Stratified treatment effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and SHEP (simple home exercise program) individually and in combination on change of DNAm measures from baseline to year 3. Panels A and B show regression coefficients, and their 95% CI derived from analysis of covariance adjusted for chronological age (continuous + spline at 85 years), sex, falls before study, body mass index, study site, respective baseline biological age measure. All analyses were done in n = 777 participants sampled at baseline and at 3-year follow-up, without technical replicates. The treatment effects in Panel A are stratified by BMI (≤25 kg/m2 vs >25 kg/m2) and in Panel B by baseline serum Vitamin D concentrations (<20 ng/mL vs ≥20 ng/mL).
Extended Data Fig. 4 Stratified treatment effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and SHEP (simple home exercise program) individually and in combination on change of DNAm measures from baseline to year 3. Panels A and B show regression coefficients, and their 95% CI derived from analysis of covariance adjusted for chronological age (continuous + spline at 85 years), sex, falls before study, body mass index, study site, respective baseline biological age measure. All analyses were done in n = 777 participants sampled at baseline and at 3-year follow-up, without technical replicates. The treatment effects in Panel A are stratified by BMI (≤25 kg/m2 vs >25 kg/m2) and in Panel B by baseline serum Vitamin D concentrations (<20 ng/mL vs ≥20 ng/mL).CC BY · PubMed Central
Extended Data Fig. 5 Stratified treatment effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and SHEP (simple home exercise program) individually and in combination on change of DNAm measures from baseline to year 3. The forest plot shows regression coefficients stratified by serum omega-3 concentration (≤100 ng/mL and >100 ng/mL), and their 95% CI derived from analysis of covariance adjusted for chronological age (continuous + spline at 85 years), sex, falls before study, body mass index, study site, respective baseline biological age measure. All analyses were done in n = 777 participants sampled at baseline and at 3-year follow-up, without technical replicates.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Stratified treatment effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and SHEP (simple home exercise program) individually and in combination on change of DNAm measures from baseline to year 3. The forest plot shows regression coefficients stratified by serum omega-3 concentration (≤100 ng/mL and >100 ng/mL), and their 95% CI derived from analysis of covariance adjusted for chronological age (continuous + spline at 85 years), sex, falls before study, body mass index, study site, respective baseline biological age measure. All analyses were done in n = 777 participants sampled at baseline and at 3-year follow-up, without technical replicates.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 140

Metadata

Authors
Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A., Gängler, S., Wieczorek, M., Belsky, D. W., Ryan, J., Kressig, R. W., Stähelin, H. B., Theiler, R., Dawson-Hughes, B., Rizzoli, R., Vellas, B., Rouch, L., Guyonnet, S., Egli, A., Orav, E. J., Willett, W., & Horvath, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Altos Labs (US)
Corresponding author
Bischoff-Ferrari, Heike A.
Venue
Nature Aging
Published
2025-02-03
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
376-385
ISSN
2662-8465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407088006
Cited by
140
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 50
FWCI
42.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Pfizer
  • European Commission (278588)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-23-IAHU-0011)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (204452)
  • Universität Zürich
  • Nestec
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
biological aging, DNA methylation clocks, vitamin D supplementation, omega-3 fatty acids, home-based exercise, PhenoAge, GrimAge, DunedinPACE, additive effects, older adults, epigenetic aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Vitamin D, Exercise, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, DNA Methylation, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review