Cited by 427DNA Repair MechanismsCancer-related Molecular PathwaysTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoints and DNA strand break repair in development and tumorigenesis

Dasika, Gopal K, Lin, Suh-Chin J, Zhao, Song, Sung, Patrick, Tomkinson, Alan, Lee, Eva Y-H P·1999·Oncogene

Abstract

Several newly identified tumor suppressor genes including ATM, NBS1, BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in DNA double-strand break repair (DSBR) and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. Many of the gene products involved in checkpoint control and DSBR have been studied in great detail in yeast. In addition to evolutionarily conserved proteins such as Chk1 and Chk2, studies in mammalian cells have identified novel proteins such as p53 in executing checkpoint control. DSBR proteins including Mre11, Rad50, Rad51, Rad54, and Ku are present in yeast and in mammals. Many of the tumor suppressor gene products interact with these repair proteins as well as checkpoint regulators, thus providing a biochemical explanation for the pleiotropic phenotypes of mutant cells. This review focuses on the proteins mediating G1/S, S, and G2/M checkpoint control in mammalian cells. In addition, mammalian DSBR proteins and their activities are discussed. An intricate network among DNA damage signal transducers, cell cycle regulators and the DSBR pathways is illustrated. Mouse knockout models for genes involved in these processes have provided valuable insights into their function, establishing genomic instability as a major contributing factor in tumorigenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1203283

Cites

199 of 199 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dasika, G. K., Lin, S.-C. J., Zhao, S., Sung, P., Tomkinson, A., & Lee, E. Y.-H. P.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Oncogene
Published
1999-12-20
Volume
18
Issue
55
Pages
7883-7899
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2052801384
Cited by
427
References
199
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1R01NS378381)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
DNA damage response, cell cycle checkpoints, DNA double-strand break repair, tumor suppressor, ATM, NBS1, BRCA1, BRCA2, Chk1, Chk2, p53, MRE11, RAD50, RAD51, Rad54, Ku protein, genomic instability, carcinogenesis, mouse knockout models, G1/S checkpoint, G2/M checkpoint
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Cycle, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Mammals, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Signal Transduction, Mice, Knockout, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review